@parados,
parados wrote:
So now you are going to ignore the Oregon law?
If someone has not returned the car when they are arrested, how do you know they were intending to return it?
Quote:However, the same culprit who drives off in another's car without permission and takes it across the country probably demonstrates a specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the car and would be guilty of the more serious crime of car theft.
Failing to return the car shows intent under your quote. Being arrested before returning to the car meets that standard.
Heh, Parry, you and Bobby never seem to be able to grasp the point, eh? You guys wanna go to law school, get hired on in the DA's office in Harney Co. Oregon, and try to get the charges changed out of the petty vengeance you're seeking, help yourselves.
I aint tryin to play DA here like you are. I made one simple point. He was NOT charged with theft. Ya don't like that? Go talk to the DA. I aint him, as you seem to think.
Or are y'all STILL tryin to maintain the false claim that he WAS charged with theft? If so, you're still wrong. Give it up.