Anyone who really cared to see how accurately and completely this cop cheerleader presents the visual contents of videos (like the one pertaining to Rice) need only look at the Finicum video, eh?: With respect to the guy who appears to have possibly shot Finny while his hands were up, he says:
Quote:
The officer who was nearly hit is still recovering, but on his knees...The officer who had nearly been run over is now on his feet and moving for cover, his back Finicum’s truck. He is no part of the confrontation at all.
No mention is made of him possibly shooting Finny, causing him to drop his left (non-shooting) hand to his side and begin to stumble. Instead, we are told that Finny "caught his right toe in the snow" and that this guy was "no part of the confrontation at all." No mention is made of the fact that Finny pointed at that guy and apparently said something. None of that even happened, if you trust his narration, eh?
Just the way the commies like it, eh?
I'll give Blicky credit for acknowledging that legimate questions along these lines are raised by the video, even though he obviously wants to say this killing was entirely justified.
Again, the question this video doesn't even try to answer is: "Where did the THREE shots, acknowledged by the FBI, come from?