53
   

The rules are changing, we are going to start showing the assholes the door

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 07:22 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Yep...I switched "Anthony" with "Billy" the kid who played him. That was one of the series' best episodes.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 07:23 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
I remember watching that episode. It scared the bejesus out of me.
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 08:43 pm
@glitterbag,
What locked?
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:05 pm
@dlowan,
I think they were referring to putting a lock (a stop) on threads that had gotten too ugly. Once a thread is locked, no one can post. Does that help?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:08 pm
@glitterbag,
This thread was locked, earlier.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:09 pm
The more I think about it, I like the idea of structuring threads so that the tangential arguments can just spin off, leaving the central thread to continue its topical discussion. I think that could potentially spare folks a lot of migraines.
glitterbag
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:11 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

This thread was locked, earlier.


Really???? How did I miss that?
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:11 pm
@snood,
Quote:
I like the idea of structuring threads so that the tangential arguments can just spin off, leaving the central thread to continue its topical discussion


I dig that.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:16 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

This thread was locked, earlier.


Really???? How did I miss that?

It didn't last long.
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:19 pm
@edgarblythe,
Thanks, Edgar
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:49 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

I think they were referring to putting a lock (a stop) on threads that had gotten too ugly. Once a thread is locked, no one can post. Does that help?


Oh, I know that. It was just my way of noting that it's been unlocked.
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:54 pm
@dlowan,
Oh sorry bunny, sometimes I'm a little dense.
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 09:56 pm
@dlowan,
I think there were temporary suspensions of certain people on the thread, rather than a lock.
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 10:08 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:
I remember watching that episode.


That was a good thing you did. A very good thing.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 10:09 pm
@Lash,
I tried to post and it directed me to the original post by Robert, several times. Locked all right.
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 10:17 pm
@edgarblythe,
Ah. Must've been a relatively short duration compared to the lockdowns of yore... Thanks for info.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 10:18 pm
@Lash,
It was locked, I think for a day, but definitely locked. Robert later commented on it somewhere, maybe here on this thread. (just saw EdgarB's post now)
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Dec, 2015 11:04 pm
@glitterbag,
glitterbag wrote:

Oh sorry bunny, sometimes I'm a little dense.


Sometimes I am extremely gnomic.
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 28 Dec, 2015 12:44 am
@layman,
layman wrote:

snood wrote:

You are out of line man. But it's abundantly clear that you are not going to let being wrong stand in your way, so blather on.


I see this post got overwhelming approval from the crowd. But no one has even attempted to answer the simple question I asked, to wit: How am I wrong?

Is this a declaration of some rational objection, or just an expression of emotion?


Still no response to this question, eh? Whole lotta silent people, given that there were so many anxious to express their moral outrage with their votes.

People round this here joint will deliberately misread posts, just to attempt to give the appearance that they have grounds for making a strong moral condemnation, eh? Buncha drama queens, I tellya.
layman
 
  0  
Reply Mon 28 Dec, 2015 01:20 am
@layman,
The people who responded to my posts all chose to assert, against the clear evidence and in disingenuous denial of my stated intentions, that I was attacking Andrew. Clearly I wasn't. I didn't say a single word about him, other than that I liked him.

But somehow I am causing people great pain, eh?

Go figure.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lola at the Coffee House - Question by Lola
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Adding Tags to Threads - Discussion by Brandon9000
LOST & MISPLACED A2K people. - Discussion by msolga
Merry Andrew - Discussion by edgarblythe
Spot the April Fools gag yet? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Great New Look to A2K- Applause, Robert! - Discussion by Phoenix32890
Head count - Discussion by CalamityJane
New A2K feature requests. - Discussion by DrewDad
The great migration - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 06:48:31