25
   

Regarding the Attacks in Paris:

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 12:27 pm
@layman,
Quote:
Hmm, what was a "highly secretive" meeting in DC then became even more "secretive" when a select few, namely "these spy masterminds met in secret after their conference at the home of US Vice President Joseph Biden," eh?

Funny that this account seems to know all about what was said at this secret, secret meeting, eh?

That knowledge of secrets being assumed, they then say they "could not rule out a retaliatory strike against the Federation."

I wonder what else they "couldn't rule out?"



Don't know what you are saying.

But EVERYTHING you see on telly or read in newspaper is there ONLY for public consumption.

It is ALL propaganda!!

what was your question? Wink
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 12:29 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
But EVERYTHING you see on telly or read in newspaper is there ONLY for public consumption.

It is ALL propaganda!!


Oh sure....... Drunk

OK, since we have established that you are not a mental case what is the deal with you? Are you eight years old? Fess up.
Quehoniaomath
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 01:43 pm
@hawkeye10,
I never asked to believe me blindly, or did I?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 02:10 pm
@layman,
Free speech, but not protected speech. The courts will decide.
layman
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 02:16 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Free speech, but not protected speech. The courts will decide


Yeah, they will. I must say that I have been a little baffled by the very concept of a "hate crime." It often seems ill-defined and without any significant basis for imposing "extra" punishment.

Actually, I think that type of crime is one of the most susceptible to "rehabilitation."

For the same reasons, I guess, I could never understand imposing criminal sanctions for such things as "denying the holocaust." Just sounds like an attempt at "thought control" to me.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 02:24 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Sorry but the first duty of the US government is the security and safety of US citizens and if and until sleeper agents can be filter out of the refugees then we should not take them in.

We should instead slammed ISIS as no group had ever been slammed in the long history of mankind so those refugees can be resettle to their homeland.
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 02:44 pm
@BillRM,
Take your medication for crissakes.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 03:29 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
take your medication for crissakes.


LOL
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  3  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 05:04 pm
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/2ec4c591a6d8898297c657c58578bb5621ccd838/0_0_2400_4133/master/2400.jpg?w=940&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=45f672ae7d17bbf2e56b0b1099382937
layman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 05:51 pm
@hingehead,
Well, Hingy, outta them choices, Imma hafta go with the Daily Xenophobe which asks the (easily answered) question: Islam: Bad or Terrible?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  4  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 06:59 pm
Perhaps we should just ban religion.
ossobuco
 
  4  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 07:14 pm
@neologist,
Territorial wars would still go on, just with different excuses. Er, reasons.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  0  
Reply Tue 17 Nov, 2015 07:55 pm
@neologist,
Perhaps we should just ban religion.

Quote:
Freedom from Religion | Proposed UN Resolution / Charter Amendment | Version 1.1

WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS HEREBY VOW
* to save succeeding generations from the scourge of organized religion, a folly which has brought untold sorrow to mankind through the division, hatred and conflict it engenders,

AND FOR THESE ENDS WE UNDERTAKE
1.....
3. To outlaw, with immediate effect, private gatherings of three or more people for the purposes of engaging in acts of worship or religious services.
4. To outlaw, with immediate effect, the publication of books, literature or articles which seek to promote religious beliefs or encourage adherence to religious doctrine....
7. To begin, with immediate effect, the destruction or reassignment of predominantly religious buildings, such as churches, mosques and temples.


Yeah! That should oughta learn their sorry muslim asses, eh!?

Now, that's what a UN is, and should be, all about, sho nuff.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  6  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 06:59 am
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2015/151116-hypocritical-compassionless-bigoted-clueless-republican.jpg
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 10:21 am
@bobsal u1553115,
The solution is simple we go in and wiped out ISIS and have a heart to heart talk with Assad about behaving himself in the future or he will end up like Muammar Gaddafi and then resettle the refugees black home.
izzythepush
 
  4  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 10:45 am
@BillRM,
It's only simple if you don't know what's going on. Syria has a majority Sunni population, they will not accept Assad, especially after what they've been through, regardless of how he behaves in the future. A lot of them would rather have IS, who target Christians, Shias, Allawites, Kurds and other minorities for persecution and by and large leave the Sunni Arabs alone. Then you've got Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states who would still be happy to fund IS because that would increase their (Sunni) influence whilst limiting Iran's (Shia) influence.

Then there's Turkey who does not want any Kurdish autonomy to do well because it leads to calls for greater autonomy from their own Kurdish population, and possible loss of territory.

The whole situation is far more complicated than you can imagine.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 11:19 am
@izzythepush,
Then after wiping ISIS break the so call country up, but with everyone being fully aware if such nonsense of an ISIS type movement return so will we like a hammer of god.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 12:43 pm
@BillRM,
What the **** are you trying to say? The above is gibberish. You can use as much apocalyptic language as you want but you can't defeat a guerrilla organisation with force alone. Wahhabism could be classed as IS type and it's the prevailing ideology in Saudi Arabia.

You're out of your depth on this one. You just don't comprehend all the different competing forces. And that's why you've reverted to type, spouting word salad.
neologist
 
  3  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 01:27 pm
@izzythepush,
How true
Can you think of any "western" nation who has successfully pressed its will on any Muslim nation?
From the repatriation of Jews in the 40s to the invasion of Iraq, the record is one of confusion, bloodshed, and failure. There are more fuses attached to this bomb than are possible to count, much less to find, much less to put out.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Wed 18 Nov, 2015 01:43 pm
@BillRM,
I'll admit: that was at least thought out.

How about everybody stop giving arms to anybody else that isn't a recognized state, with the only exception being the Kurds. Lock up their money, stop exporting Toyotas to them.

After a while they will sort out this problem given to them by the victorious countries of WWI.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 1.48 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:15:11