Regarding the Attacks in Paris:

Fine, report me. I haven't deleted anything.

Pants on fire......LOL

The only tactical nukes we have anymore are the new B61-12's.

They are amazing devices with their extreme accuracy and reduced yields, but they are rather expensive if you want to use them for any sort of large-scale destruction. They are for when you want to nuke a concentration of enemy troops while causing minimal collateral damage.

If you want to go the nuclear route, I'd recommend instead that we use some of the 100kt SLBM warheads.

We have so many 100kt SLBM warheads that most of them are going to have to be dismantled in future arms control agreements, and they have such a small yield (albeit double the maximum power of those tactical nukes) that they are less than ideal for a strategic nuke.

If we use up our very expensive and low yield tactical nukes, we'll have to pay to build more of them.

If we use up some of those 100kt warheads, that will just be fewer that we'll have to dismantle in coming years.

Why used small tac nukes when we and the Russians have fuel/air bombs that can level square miles?

Gun linked to Paris attacks traced back to Florida arms dealer implicated in Iran-Contra scandal

You know, a right wing, christian, white guy. Someone who looks a lot like BillRM.

Source: Raw Story

A gun linked to last month’s Paris mass shootings has been traced back to a Florida arms dealer.

The serial number for a M92 semi-automatic pistol linked to the deadly Nov. 13 terrorist attacks matched one for a weapon delivered by the Zastava arms factory in May 2013 to Century International Arms in Delray Beach, reported the Palm Beach Post.

Michael Sucher, the owner of Century Arms, did not answer calls seeking comment Thursday and the doors to his shop were closed as TV news crews gathered outside.

(...)

John Rugg, a former police officer and longtime Century Arms employee, testified before a U.S. Senate committee in 1987 that the company had supplied rockets, grenades and other weapons to Nicaraguan rebels as part of the Iran-Contra scandal.


Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2015/12/gun-linked-to-paris-attacks-traced-back-to-florida-arms-dealer-implicated-in-iran-contra-scandal/

You defend a pedophile. Seriously. What is wrong with you?

Well of course it is dummy. The rape and the picture are not separate. No rape, no picture of the rape. Be honest: do you enjoy rape pictures?

Dear God, it makes me sick how many people see molested children and think it's not a big deal.

Well of course it's not.

While it is very unlikely that anyone who possesses a picture of a child being raped does so for innocent reasons, it remains a possibility. There is no possibility that someone raping a child is doing so innocently.

Assuming, as is likely the case, that the possession of such a photo is for lascivious reasons it is, without question, horrendously vile, and it is illegal. I don't know with certainty what the case may be in all 50 States, but I doubt very much that there aren't different statutes involved in prosecuting the crime of possession of such a photo and actually raping a child. To the extent that any State has mandatory sentencing regarding these crimes, I also seriously doubt they are the same.

Depending on the purpose of the debate it could easily be a difference without distinction. They are both sick and vile and attempting to draw a significant distinction between the two on a moral basis is, at best, absurd, but of course there is a difference and if it is only from a legal perspective, that is not insignificant.

Your question to Bill is uncalled for and just plain shitty. He expressed an opinion that a 25 year sentence for downloading child pornography is too harsh. As a result you accuse him of defending a pedophile and imply that he is one.

I think you're a paedophile because of what you've said about hanging out in a park with a box of kittens, your ex wife needing to get a restraining order, your insistence in talking about computer security about a paedophile watching child pornography on a plane, and your need that sentencing guidelines for paedophiles should be less punitive whilst keeping all other sentencing, particularly that of non violent offenders, just the way things are.

e

Not a damn thing wrong with me as I once more have no problem with punishing the man for downloading such materials I however I think twenty years if insane for that crime when that is all as did he did not molest one child himself.

UK and other EU nations have must more sane punishments for such crimes and the majority of federal judges agree with me that the guidelines for such punishments is too harsh.

So you might also ask what is wrong with the majority of federal judges also.

No I do not enjoy rape pictures even adult porn rape pictures but why do you not ask the same question of the majority of federal judges or the majority of the UK lawmakers for that matter as both groups do not think that the current US level of punishment fit the crime.

An if the fireman had not download one picture no child would not had been a rape victims as a result.

You don't know that. He was stopped in time.

Molesting children should call for twenty or more years prison sentences however having pictures of such deeds should be a crime but does not called for a twenty years sentence.

LOL I am very guilty of being a cat lover and when a mother cat and her kittens show up one day at my door I did move heaven and earth to find the kittens homes.

That the only damn thing I am guilty of.

Next Izzy I am not in the mood for your nonsense at the moment, as the mother cat Midnight who had been with me since 2009 when she walked into my life with her kittens needed to be put down yesterday at my vet while I was petting her and rubbing her ears.

My bet Izzy is that you had never love anyone in your life be it a pet or a person.

I don't have time for your nonsense, but when you claim that you're being called a paedophile for no good reason, I'll point out the very good reasons why I, and others, think that of you.

No dear trying to find homes for kittens including a park within 300 feet of my front door is not an indication that I am anything but a cat lover.

You've repeated your cover story ad nauseam. I don't buy it, no matter how many times you repeat it.

And I'm not at all surprised that you get all weepy about a dead cat, but show no concern whatsoever for the victims of childhood sexual abuse.

You are a sad old man indeed and placing a firefighter in prison for 20 years who never touch any child is not going to benefit any child who was a victim of sexual abused.

In fact the 30,000 dollars or so a year or the 600,000 thousands in total for housing the firefighter in prison could be far better spend on programs to aid such children instead.

It will prevent future victims. There's nothing sadder than someone who's normalised their deviant behaviour to the point that they no longer understand its deviancy. It's unrealistic to think that taking a position where you want shorter sentencing just for sex criminals and not non violent ones isn't going to have people thinking you're worried out of self interest.