@izzythepush,
Whitebars aka Nononono just doesn't understand women--or how they think about, or talk about, or regard their bodies. He thinks vaginal symbols employed in feminist art or literature reflect literal concerns or perceptions about their genitalia that surface in the actual discourse of average women regularly and generally. He also fails to realize that some of this vaginal symbolism in feminist art was simply push-back against Freudian psychoanalytic notions that females had "penis envy".
Nononono, bound by his own male perspective, thinks women tend to regard their vaginas the way men regard their penises, and to invest them with similar identity-defining attributes of "power" "pride" "masculinity" "manhood" "strength", etc. His thinking is unfortunately concrete and literal, and hastily concocted from his grasping at snippets of various Wikipedia articles on feminism, or from the anti-feminist rants on the men's rights activists Web sites, which is why it winds up being so distorted and inaccurate. He actually knows next to nothing about feminism. That can be seen in his posts in the most recent pages of this thread.
http://able2know.org/topic/285616-10#post-5997154
Nononono seems to have no awareness that vaginas are only rather small internal portions of a rather complex female sexual/reproductive apparatus that is largely hidden from a female's view. For many women, the actual vagina is the least sensitive part of the genitalia contributing to organism.
Women may need to use a mirror to properly visualize their external genitalia, and to view anatomical drawings like the one above, to visualize the internal portions. It's not what's externally visible between her legs, as nononono seems to think, and most women don't want to sit around and discuss their vaginas any more than they want to discuss their eyes or ears or other body parts. As far as making us special and unique, I think every woman I know would credit her brain over her vagina for giving her that uniqueness and power.
But, since nononono's goal is to mock and ridicule women, particularly "feminists", he can't be bothered dealing with reality or actually
listening to any women.
I didn't grow up hearing either the words "vagina" or "penis"--my family used their own euphemistic terms for these body parts, words which were really more personal and private, and not without a certain amount of affection and warmth that is lost when using the anatomical terms. Truthfully, I still retain a certain fondness for using the euphemisms in private. My "vagina" is part of what my gynecologist examines.
My memory may be faulty, but I think it was the second-wave feminists, possibly along with the sex researchers of the time, who urged using the word "vagina" more often than the euphemisms so that women could be more open and public about discussing and exploring their sexuality, as well as any sexual problems they experienced. I think referring to this area by the neutral and objective and clinical term "vagina" did help women to communicate more openly--particularly about their sexual needs--because "vagina" seemed more impersonal it reduced their embarrassment and modesty.
Anyway, nononono (aka whitebars and possibly aka Buttermilk as well) has a previous history of starting numerous trash threads which are used to generate or hurl insults at other members and just generally stir up totally needless unpleasantness at A2K. He's continuing that pattern now, albeit in female drag as an alleged "feminist", on these 2 currently active threads, in addition to this one.
http://able2know.org/topic/285616-1
http://able2know.org/topic/285933-1
And he's continuing his juvenile brand of nastiness in this thread started by Setanta...
http://able2know.org/topic/285691-1
And this was his first thread as whitebars...
http://able2know.org/topic/262626-1
He's an attention whore who seems to get a kick out of trying to jerk people around and trash threads. This current "feminist" impersonation of his is just the latest incarnation to help drag this site down.