25
   

Potty-Mouthed Princesses Drop F-Bombs for Feminism by FCKH8.com

 
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 12:41 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:
It hasn't seemed to have accumulated any political baggage. There is no pacifist brand.


really?

In my world, pacifism has a stronger "brand" than feminism - and has significant social and political baggage.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 12:42 pm
@hingehead,
hingehead wrote:

"feminism is bad unlike any other social 'ism' because I said so"


perfect sigline for Max
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 12:43 pm
@hingehead,
You are here to win points for your ideological position. I am hear to find interesting ideas to discuss. I gave you your point for cute googling skills. But, you aren't raising any interesting issues.

I thought Izzy's Abolitionist example was actually an interesting counter-example, and I said so. I even offered a discussion on it.

If you want points for being right... here you go. 100 points.
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 12:44 pm
@ehBeth,
Sure. EhBeth. As you wish.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 12:51 pm
@ehBeth,
Here is the question EhBeth.

If I said "I don't like war, but I don't want to be called a 'pacifist'" would I get 20 pages of personal insults from pacifists demanding that I accept the label?

I don't think so.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 01:10 pm
@maxdancona,
Right, so you make a plainly false statement, I offer you evidence and I'm at fault for not raising anything interesting? Then your fall back is to make snide remarks about the web search engine you think I used to find examples that you could evaluate for yourself?

I wasn't arguing from an ideological position, my position was purely etymological.

You are a very strange cat.
maxdancona
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 01:31 pm
@hingehead,
I gave you 10 points for your little image. I don't see why you keep arguing. Do you want more points for that? It isn't an interesting point, so I don't see why I would keep arguing. There is nothing interesting here.

Izzy's point, on the other hand, is at least intellectually interesting.

All I ask of you, Hingehead, is that you amuse me. You haven't been doing that too well in the last few pages. I wish you would be more like Izzy.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 03:37 pm
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

I will give you ¨abolitionist¨. That is a valid counter-example.


The most valid one by far is Chartist. As you don't appear to be intellectually curious enough by yourself, here you are.

Quote:
Chartism was a working-class movement for political reform in Britain which existed from 1838 to 1858. It took its name from the People's Charter of 1838 and was a national protest movement, with particular strongholds of support in the north of England, the east Midlands, the Potteries, the Black Country and south Wales. Support for the movement was at its highest in 1839, 1842 and 1848 when petitions signed by millions of working people were presented to the House of Commons. The strategy employed was to use the scale of support which these petitions and the accompanying mass meetings demonstrated to put pressure on politicians to concede manhood suffrage. Chartism thus relied on constitutional methods to secure its aims, though there were some who became involved in insurrectionary activities, notably in south Wales and Yorkshire.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chartism
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 03:40 pm
What about cyclists?

https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfa1/v/t1.0-9/10547617_10152386638528292_5862212261331626591_n.jpg?oh=9e72e3642e3293a340cf3f82abf3550b&oe=5506A068

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Cyclists-Against-Reckless-Drivers-Foundation/128247983291
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 03:44 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:
In my world, pacifism has a stronger "brand" than feminism - and has significant social and political baggage.


If there was no "brand" there would no need for ridicule.

http://www.ppu.org.uk/coproject/coimages/co-postcard.jpg
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  3  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:03 pm
@maxdancona,
All I ask is that you make logically consistent statements. Pie in the sky.

[feverishly hunts for image of max in closet with hands over ears going la-la-la-la]
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:14 pm
Women being made to think equality is wrong is nothing new.

http://fe01.museumoflondon.org.uk/imagestore/220/media-220351/large.jpg
Germlat
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:18 pm
@izzythepush,
Wondering here what makes you so in favor of equal rights? I know you're a single parent...which makes me respect you fro the get-go..But--just curious... Do you have daughters?
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:24 pm
@Germlat,
I am as least as much in favor of equal rights as Izzy is. I am a single father of a daughter. Don't confuse ideological purity with equal rights.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:45 pm
@maxdancona,
You want equal rights on your terms, that's not the same thing.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:45 pm
@Germlat,
I have a daughter.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:46 pm
@Germlat,
Germlat wrote:

Wondering here what makes you so in favor of equal rights?


I'm a Socialist, gender equality is part of the class struggle.
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 05:52 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

Germlat wrote:

Wondering here what makes you so in favor of equal rights?


I'm a Socialist, gender equality is part of the class struggle.


That explains a lot.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 06:14 pm
@maxdancona,
Like why we have universal health care and you don't.
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 07:27 pm
@izzythepush,
ouch
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 03:03:00