@glitterbag,
Talk about confusing news reports, this is a direct contradiction of the earlier report that said "Russia not involved."
Then this,
Quote:“We don’t know who, like, pulled the trigger,” the official said. “We don’t know that a Russian was operating the system. However, that in no way precludes Russian involvement in the sense that they are the most likely source for this system.”
“We assign responsibility generally to Russia for how the separatists are armed and trained,” the official said. “What we have is a kind of picture of evidence that says the Russians have been providing these arms, these types of systems, and the Russians have been providing training — and that adds up to a picture that implicates Russia,” but “we’re going to be careful about saying who did it if we don’t know for certain.”
“We don’t know who literally was operating the system that day,” the official said. “That’s the hardest thing to determine.”
Talk about mixed messages, it sounds like they've covered not and maybe.
What's next? Russia armed them and trained them, but "we don't know?"
Give a kid a gun who shoots another kid, then deny any involvement. Politics as usual.