18
   

Cruel or the Circle of Life?

 
 
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 10 Feb, 2014 07:13 pm
@farmerman,
What a guy that Farmer is! He gets his panties in a bunch over a giraffe but hundreds of thousands of people slaughtered because of a USA government supplied death list doesn't get any reaction from him save for making excuses for genocide.


Ex-agents say CIA compiled death lists for Indonesians

After 25 years, Americans speak of their
role in exterminating Communist Party

by Kathy Kadane, States News Service, 1990

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government played a significant role in one of the worst massacres of the century by supplying the names of thousands of Communist Party leaders to the Indonesian army, which hunted down the leftists and killed them, former U.S. diplomats say.
For the first time, U.S. officials acknowledge that in 1965 they systematically compiled comprehensive lists of Communist operatives, from top echelons down to village cadres. As many as 5,000 names were furnished to the Indonesian army, and the Americans later checked off the names of those who had been killed or captured, according to the U.S. officials.

The killings were part of a massive bloodletting that took an estimated 250,000 lives.

The purge of the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) was part of a U.S. drive to ensure that Communists did not come to power in the largest country in Southeast Asia, where the United States was already fighting an undeclared war in Vietnam. Indonesia is the fifth most-populous country in the world.

Silent for a quarter-century, former senior U.S. diplomats and CIA officers described in lengthy interviews how they aided Indonesian President Suharto, then army leader, in his attack on the PKI.

"It really was a big help to the army," said Robert J. Martens, a former member of the U.S. Embassy's political section who is now a consultant to the State Department. "They probably killed a lot of people, and I probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that's not all bad. There's a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment."

White House and State Department spokesmen declined comment on the disclosures.

Although former deputy CIA station chief Joseph Lazarsky and former diplomat Edward Masters, who was Martens' boss, said CIA agents contributed in drawing up the death lists, CIA spokesman Mark Mansfield said, "There is no substance to the allegation that the CIA was involved in the preparation and/or distribution of a list that was used to track down and kill PKI members. It is simply not true."

Indonesian Embassy spokesman Makarim Wibisono said he had no personal knowledge of events described by former U.S. officials. "In terms of fighting the Communists, as far as I'm concerned, the Indonesian people fought by themselves to eradicate the Communists," he said.

Martens, an experienced analyst of communist affairs, headed an embassy group of State Department and CIA officers that spent two years compiling the lists. He later delivered them to an army intermediary.

People named on the lists were captured in overwhelming numbers, Martens said, adding, "It's a big part of the reason the PKI has never come back."

The PKI was the third-largest Communist Party in the world, with an estimated 3 million members. Through affiliated organizations such as labor and youth groups it claimed the loyalties of another 17 million.

In 1966 the Washington Post published an estimate that 500,000 were killed in the purge and the brief civil war it triggered. In a 1968 report, the CIA estimated there had been 250,000 deaths, and called the carnage "one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century."

U.S. Embassy approval

Approval for the release of the names came from the top U.S. Embassy officials, including former Ambassador Marshall Green, deputy chief of mission Jack Lydman and political section chief Edward Masters, the three acknowledged in interviews.
Declassified embassy cables and State Department reports from early October 1965, before the names were turned over, show that U.S. officials knew Suharto had begun roundups of PKI cadres, and that the embassy had unconfirmed reports that firing squads were being formed to kill PKI prisoners.

Former CIA Director William Colby, in an interview, compared the embassy's campaign to identify the PKI leadership to the CIA's Phoenix Program in Vietnam. In 1965, Colby was the director of the CIA's Far East division and was responsible for directing U.S. covert strategy in Asia.

"That's what I set up in the Phoenix Program in Vietnam -- that I've been kicked around for a lot," he said. "That's exactly what it was. It was an attempt to identify the structure" of the Communist Party.

Phoenix was a joint U.S.-South Vietnamese program set up by the CIA in December 1967 that aimed at neutralizing members of the National Liberation Front, the Vietcong political cadres. It was widely criticized for alleged human rights abuses.

"You shoot them"

"The idea of identifying the local apparatus was designed to -- well, you go out and get them to surrender, or you capture or you shoot them," Colby said of the Phoenix Program. "I mean, it was a war, and they were fighting. So it was really aimed at providing intelligence for operations rather than a big picture of the thing."
In 1962, when he took over as chief of the CIA's Far East division, Colby said he discovered the United States did not have comprehensive lists of PKI activists. Not having the lists "could have been criticized as a gap in the intelligence system," he said, adding they were useful for "operation planning" and provided a picture of how the party was organized. Without such lists, he said, "you're fighting blind."

Asked if the CIA had been responsible for sending Martens, a foreign service officer, to Jakarta in 1963 to compile the lists, Colby said, "Maybe, I don't know. Maybe we did it. I've forgotten."

The lists were a detailed who's-who of the leadership of the party of 3 million members, Martens said. They included names of provincial, city and other local PKI committee members, and leaders of the "mass organizations," such as the PKI national labor federation, women's and youth groups.

Better information

"I know we had a lot more information" about the PKI "than the Indonesians themselves," Green said. Martens "told me on a number of occasions that ... the government did not have very good information on the Communist setup, and he gave me the impression that this information was superior to anything they had."
Masters, the embassy's political section chief, said he believed the army had lists of its own, but they were not as comprehensive as the American lists. He said he could not remember whether the decision to release the names had been cleared with Washington.

The lists were turned over piecemeal, Martens said, beginning at the top of the communist organization. Martens supplied thousands of names to an Indonesian emissary over a number of months, he said. The emissary was an aide to Adam Malik, an Indonesian minister who was an ally of Suharto in the attack on the Communists.

Interviewed in Jakarta, the aide, Tirta Kentjana ("Kim") Adhyatman, confirmed he had met with Martens and received lists of thousands of names, which he in turn gave to Malik. Malik passed them on to Suharto's headquarters, he said.

"Shooting list"

Embassy officials carefully recorded the subsequent destruction of the PKI organization. Using Martens' lists as a guide, they checked off names of captured and assassinated PKI leaders, tracking the steady dismantling of the party apparatus, former U.S. officials said.
Information about who had been captured and killed came from Suharto's headquarters, according to Joseph Lazarsky, deputy CIA station chief in Jakarta in 1965. Suharto's Jakarta headquarters was the central collection point for military reports from around the country detailing the capture and killing of PKI leaders, Lazarsky said.

"We were getting a good account in Jakarta of who was being picked up," Lazarsky said. "The army had a 'shooting list' of about 4,000 or 5,000 people."

Detention centers were set up to hold those who were not killed immediately.

"They didn't have enough goon squads to zap them all, and some individuals were valuable for interrogation," Lazarsky said. "The infrastructure was zapped almost immediately. We knew what they were doing. We knew they would keep a few and save them for the kangaroo courts, but Suharto and his advisers said, if you keep them alive, you have to feed them."

Masters, the chief of the political section, said, "We had these lists" constructed by Martens, "and we were using them to check off what was happening to the party, what the effect" of the killings "was on it."

Lazarsky said the checkoff work was also carried out at the CIA's intelligence directorate in Washington.

Leadership destroyed

By the end of January 1966, Lazarsky said, the checked-off names were so numerous the CIA analysts in Washington concluded the PKI leadership had been destroyed.
"No one cared, as long as they were Communists, that they were being butchered," said Howard Federspiel, who in 1965 was the Indonesia expert at the State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research. "No one was getting very worked up about it."

Asked about the checkoffs, Colby said, "We came to the conclusion that with the sort of Draconian way it was carried out, it really set them" -- the communists -- "back for years."

Asked if he meant the checkoffs were proof that the PKI leadership had been caught or killed, he said, "Yeah, yeah, that's right, ... the leading elements, yeah."

http://www.namebase.org/kadane.html
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Feb, 2014 07:16 pm
Also - it's not just children that would be plotzed by seeing all this (oh, look, a lesson) - many people of all ages form attachments to zoo animals and may revisit them over and over. I was fond of an aged chimp in a small but lovely northern california zoo. A lot of the town mourned when he died, at something like age 50 (I'd have to look his age up).
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 10 Feb, 2014 07:31 pm
@ossobuco,
Do you think American kids would be plotzed to find out their governments had death squads, Osso, and extermination camps?
0 Replies
 
VengenceGraphics
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 03:17 am
@Linkat,
I say the people at the zoo are twisted for two reasons:
1) the fact that they kill a harmless giraffe just for the fact so that they stop inbreed really pisses me off, and
2) that they would hack it to pieces in front of a crowd of onlookers, and then feed the pieces of giraffe to the lions. It just goes to show how cruel and heartless some ******* brainless people can be.
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 08:48 am
@tsarstepan,
I don't see why not. Autopsies are interesting. The BBC has an entire series about them. It's called "Inside nature's giants", and you can watch it on YouTube. Or not: Nobody who dislikes autopsies needs to watch them, be it on the internet or in real life.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 08:52 am
@VengenceGraphics,
VengenceGraphics wrote:
1) the fact that they kill a harmless giraffe just for the fact so that they stop inbreed really pisses me off, and

How is killing a giraffe for lion food more outrageous than killing a pig for lion food? If it's not, then killing a pig for lion food should be outrageous to you, too. Are you a vegetarian?
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 08:53 am
I've been saying for many years that all zoos (animal prisons) should be banned anyway.
But I have to say it makes for entertaining youtube viewing when animals and killer whales eat their human keepers..Wink
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:05 am
@Thomas,
Quote:

How is killing a giraffe for lion food more outrageous than killing a pig for lion food? If it's not, then killing a pig for lion food should be outrageous to you, too. Are you a vegetarian?
silly point Thomas. Its the manner and the place of killing. Usually a zoo is NOT a licensed abbatoir . Those that have abbatoir status are licensed just like any meat mrket nd have special places for slaughter. You seem to be poo pooing the Danes for their Viking-like attitudes toward life.
Do you approve of killing as part of the entertainment? Is a giraffe sacrificed to just keep hybrid vigor without checking other zoos to donate a specimen? This animal wasn't sick, just "inconvenient"
Do you know which species the girffe was? (There are several species
of giraffe that are endangered.


You've given these douche bag zookeepers a pass for some rather silly reasons
JTT
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:08 am
@farmerman,
Many silly points, Farmer, that Thomas will easily dismantle.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:14 am
@Thomas,
Heres a quote right out of (the translated) extensive MISSION AND VISION STATEMENT of the Copenhagen Zoo;

Quote:
•Be actively involved in the international efforts to preserve animal species and habitats and thereby contribute to the conservation of the biodiversity.
saab
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:28 am
Dyrenes Beskyttelse = Animal protection in Denmark support what the Zoo did.
The whole thing has got out of proportions. The zoo director has gotten threats to be killed because of this.
Every day all over world animals are killed because of overpopulation in zoos, parks and other areas. Noone cares.
Oh yes Marius had such a cute face, so people all upset. Had it been some ugly pig in the same situation nobody would have reacted.

Marius was no killed in front of all the epople. He was out in fresh air and got his favorite dark bread to eat. In the minute he took the bread he was shot. No one watched. What you see the people watch is when the corpse is cut up and that during it is explained about the giraffe.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:33 am
@farmerman,
The pro arguments include that the european zoos in their zoo association already have a plethora of giraffes with those particular giraffe genes. (I'm not pro.) One zoo, I think in Sweden, offered to take it, but wasn't in their zoo association group. And, one zoo in England that is in the association, on hearing the explanation about genes by the Copenhagen zoo re its intent to slaughter the giraffe, had offered to house the animal separately. At this point I don't remember where I read that.



0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 09:53 am
@saab,
Quote:
Noone cares
That's not true.
setting this correct (which no one hd attempted to do till you've stated it)

1They DID NOT kill the animal in front of the crowd. I hoped they had more sense than making a spectacle out of the euthanasia

2They butchered it behind doors

3 The Nat. Zoo and most other big ones have real abbatoirs that they can take their excess game and convert to meat cuts for feeding in a clean sanitary fashion (BUT, I hope all the targeted animals get checked for KJD or other prion diseases of wild animals)
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:09 am
@farmerman,
Thanks for clarifying, Saab and farmerman.
JTT
 
  -4  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:15 am
@farmerman,
Farmer the academic: setting this correct (which no one hd attempted to do till you've stated it)

----------------

Noted that you made no attempt to determine the facts before you shot your mouth off, mr academic .
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:17 am
@ossobuco,

Re: farmerman (Post 5578324)
Thanks for clarifying, Saab and neat trick trying to wiggle your way out, farmerman.
0 Replies
 
saab
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:33 am
An interview with the Danish Zoo director in English-

http://jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE6479734/britisk-tv-vaert-til-zoo-direktoer-du-er-kold-og-klinisk/
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:53 am
@farmerman,
Farmer: (BUT, I hope all the targeted animals get checked for KJD or other prion diseases of wild animals.

---------

Caused by the widespread introduction of USA game farms?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:55 am
@farmerman,
Farmer: hoped they had more sense than making a spectacle out of the euthanasia

I had hoped that you had more sense than to make a spectacle out of farmerman but you never cease to amaze.
0 Replies
 
Linkat
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Feb, 2014 10:58 am
@Lordyaswas,
Quote:
It would have been nice to see it farmed out somewhere else in the perfect world, but what would that have entailed? A solitary existence? Below par care?

I'm a bit split on this one.


Yeah I kind of agree with this - I still think it a bit weird the picture of the kids on the parents shoulders and so forth seem odd especially the little ones - who else would fit on the shoulders. I can understand the science aspect, but it does strike my funny bone.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 09:32:16