Is There Any Chance Christie Did NOT Know About the Dirty Tricks?

Frank Apisa wrote:

David, you and others like you call the McAvoy character a Republican In Name Only
apparently because he is not willing to get down into the gutter
where so many Republicans now reside.

Thanks for reminding us of that.

FOR THE RECORD:
I just didn't feel that Frank's gutteral remark was worthy of notice;
not worth my time.

Real Republicans fight to curtail, reduce and strangle
the domestic jurisdiction of government so as to EXALT
the Individual American citizen in his FREEDOM. THAT 's what its all about.





David

Frank Apisa wrote:

David, you and others like you call the McAvoy character a Republican In Name Only
apparently because he is not willing to get down into the gutter
where so many Republicans now reside.

Thanks for reminding us of that.

FOR THE RECORD:
I just didn't feel that Frank's gutteral remark was worthy of notice;
not worth my time.

Real Republicans fight to curtail, reduce and strangle
the domestic jurisdiction of government so as to EXALT
the Individual American citizen in his FREEDOM. THAT 's what its all about.





David

Yeah, David...I see.

You use "real Republicans" the way Sarah Palin used the term "real Americans."

As I said, if you Republicans ever got rid of all the haters...you would
be able to hold your national convention in a small town hall.

There is a reason American conservatism is so popular
among the intellectuals of the rural South!

you do realize that Hollywood is composed almost 100% with D sympathizers, right?

I realize that conservatives consider anyone who will not march in lock step
with their conservative masters...

...is considered a D sympathizer and a liberal.

I just don't think that is the way things are, Hawk. And while I have many, many very conservative friends...I consider American conservatism to be one of the most disgusting political philosophies ever to pollute this planet. I think the grass-roots American conservative is being led around like an ox with a nose ring.

I, myself, and not a Democrat...nor a liberal.

Did u miss this one ??

hawkeye10 wrote:

you do realize that Hollywood is composed almost 100% with D sympathizers, right?

Frank Apisa wrote:

I realize that conservatives consider anyone who will not march in lock step
with their conservative masters...

...is considered a D sympathizer and a liberal.

I just don't think that is the way things are, Hawk. And while I have many, many very conservative friends...I consider American conservatism to be one of the most disgusting political philosophies ever to pollute this planet. I think the grass-roots American conservative is being led around like an ox with a nose ring.

I, myself, and not a Democrat...nor a liberal.

COMMUNIST ????
A Marxist-Leninist ????????

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

David, you and others like you call the McAvoy character a Republican In Name Only
apparently because he is not willing to get down into the gutter
where so many Republicans now reside.

Thanks for reminding us of that.

FOR THE RECORD:
I just didn't feel that Frank's gutteral remark was worthy of notice;
not worth my time.

Real Republicans fight to curtail, reduce and strangle
the domestic jurisdiction of government so as to EXALT
the Individual American citizen in his FREEDOM. THAT 's what its all about.





David

Frank Apisa wrote:

Yeah, David...I see.

You use "real Republicans" the way Sarah Palin used the term "real Americans."

OK. Don t hijack our label,
if u don t represent our principles (essentially, those of the Sons of Liberty).

Frank Apisa wrote:

As I said, if you Republicans ever got rid of all the haters...you would
be able to hold your national convention in a small town hall.

About 5O or 6O years ago,
I used to be younger than now.
In my youth, I was more emotional.
I feared communist imperialism
and I hated it n those who supported it.

I have abandoned hatred. When Clinton was in office,
a lot of my friends n acquaintances were busy hating him.
I thawt that devotion of mental energy was wasted
n too much of a burden. Not everyone agrees with me.

Frank Apisa wrote:

There is a reason American conservatism is so popular
among the intellectuals of the rural South!

Yea, a good part of the American Revolution began there.
Washington, Madison, Jefferson, Patrick Henry all came from there.
I came from NY. So far as I was able to see,
the love of liberty was dead from loss of interest there.
I am very happy in Florida.





David

Right...the reason American conservatism is so popular
in the American South is because those people came from there.

C'mon, David. Get back to consciousness.

Yes; the spirit of personal liberty
has not been extinguished in the South.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Right...the reason American conservatism is so popular
in the American South is because those people came from there.

C'mon, David. Get back to consciousness.

Yes; the spirit of personal liberty
has not been extinguished in the South.
Living in NY, I found no trace of it, other than the proud defiance
by the users of fireworks on the 4th of July, regardless of the law.
(That was pleasingly appropriate; the 4th of July was the repudiation of law day.)

Year after year, there was not much recognition of the principle
of Individual Liberty at the expense of government jurisdiction
which that Day commemorates, other than the Mayor hollering
about NOT setting off illegal fireworks, instead of supporting
the Spirit of the occasion. Years and decades went by and NO
politician that I can remember spoke of fighting for LIBERTY;
it was just forgotten in NY, but not in the South.
That tells me that Southerners were better Americans
than my former nabors were. I was almost alone in putting out
the Flag in celebration of Old Glory, on my block in Queens
on the 4th of July. I guess Sarah was right.


I 'm pleased to know that u r not a commie; presumably not a nazi,
tho I did not ask that. Marx, Kennedy and Hitler were human beings
who enjoyed thinking for themselves.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Right...the reason American conservatism is so popular
in the American South is because those people came from there.

C'mon, David. Get back to consciousness.

Yes; the spirit of personal liberty
has not been extinguished in the South.
Living in NY, I found no trace of it, other than the proud defiance
by the users of fireworks on the 4th of July, regardless of the law.
(That was pleasingly appropriate; the 4th of July was the repudiation of law day.)

Year after year, there was not much recognition of the principle
of Individual Liberty at the expense of government jurisdiction
which that Day commemorates, other than the Mayor hollering
about NOT setting off illegal fireworks, instead of supporting
the Spirit of the occasion. Years and decades went by and NO
politician that I can remember spoke of fighting for LIBERTY;
it was just forgotten in NY, but not in the South.
That tells me that Southerners were better Americans
than my former nabors were. I was almost alone in putting out
the Flag in celebration of Old Glory, on my block in Queens
on the 4th of July. I guess Sarah was right.


I 'm pleased to know that u r not a commie; presumably not a nazi,
tho I did not ask that. Marx, Kennedy and Hitler were human beings
who enjoyed thinking for themselves.

Like I said, David...without the racists, misogynists, and general haters...American conservatism wouldn't exercise enough influence on our nation's politics to get a needed street light erected. They and the rock-hard stupid people who back people intent on oppressing them[????]...are the bedrock of American conservatism.

I have no problem with your delight in being one with them...that is your right.

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

Right...the reason American conservatism is so popular
in the American South is because those people came from there.

C'mon, David. Get back to consciousness.

Yes; the spirit of personal liberty
has not been extinguished in the South.
Living in NY, I found no trace of it, other than the proud defiance
by the users of fireworks on the 4th of July, regardless of the law.
(That was pleasingly appropriate; the 4th of July was the repudiation of law day.)

Year after year, there was not much recognition of the principle
of Individual Liberty at the expense of government jurisdiction
which that Day commemorates, other than the Mayor hollering
about NOT setting off illegal fireworks, instead of supporting
the Spirit of the occasion. Years and decades went by and NO
politician that I can remember spoke of fighting for LIBERTY;
it was just forgotten in NY, but not in the South.
That tells me that Southerners were better Americans
than my former nabors were. I was almost alone in putting out
the Flag in celebration of Old Glory, on my block in Queens
on the 4th of July. I guess Sarah was right.


I 'm pleased to know that u r not a commie; presumably not a nazi,
tho I did not ask that. Marx, Kennedy and Hitler were human beings
who enjoyed thinking for themselves.

Frank Apisa wrote:

Like I said, David...without the racists, misogynists, and general haters...American conservatism wouldn't exercise enough influence on our nation's politics to get a needed street light erected. They and the rock-hard stupid people who back people intent on oppressing them[????]...are the bedrock of American conservatism.

I have no problem with your delight in being one with them...that is your right.

WHAT oppression is THAT????

Frank Apisa wrote:

Like I said, David...without the racists, misogynists, and general haters...American conservatism wouldn't exercise enough influence on our nation's politics to get a needed street light erected. They and the rock-hard stupid people who back people intent on oppressing them[????]...are the bedrock of American conservatism.

I have no problem with your delight in being one with them...that is your right.

WHAT oppression is THAT????

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

Like I said, David...without the racists, misogynists, and general haters...American conservatism wouldn't exercise enough influence on our nation's politics to get a needed street light erected. They and the rock-hard stupid people who back people intent on oppressing them[????]...are the bedrock of American conservatism.

I have no problem with your delight in being one with them...that is your right.

WHAT oppression is THAT????

I always find it useful to remember that every single thing that Frank Apisa ever says is without exception always an outright lie.

Many conservatives were at the core of the civil rights movement.

The fact that Dave resorts to a moniker like "RINO" makes your point exactly. Join the GOP, drink the Koolaid.

farmerman wrote:

The fact that Dave resorts to a moniker like "RINO" makes your point exactly. Join the GOP, drink the Koolaid.

Why do so many Democrats call me a DINO?

Many conservatives were at the core of the civil rights movement.

Many conservatives were at the core of the civil rights movement.

I'm assuming you're saying that many conservatives supported the civil rights movement of the 1950s and the early 1960s. That just isn't so, to put it mildly.

While Birmingham's fire hoses and police dogs roiled the nation, GOP senators issued this statement in June 1963: "The Republican Members of the U.S. Senate ... reassert the basic principles of the party with respect to civil rights, and further affirm that the president, with the support of Congress, consistent with its duties as defined in the Constitution, must protect the rights of all U.S. citizens regardless of race, creed, color, or national origin."

Then they put their words into action. The 1964 Civil Rights Act passed the House with 80% of the GOP vote, compared with support from only 61% of Democrats. In the Senate, 82% of Republicans voted for it; only 69% of Democrats did. When the Voting Rights Act passed one year later, Republicans again outpaced the Democrats

The south was run by the Dems until the early 90's. From the 1940's until the 1990's it was in total Dem control.