30
   

So Saying That Folks Should Follow Christian Morals is NOW A Firing Offense

 
 
BillRM
 
  -2  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 09:29 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
What a load of old bollocks, you never miss an opportunity to slag off the UK.


Sorry if I do not think that the UK is perfect as after all it had subjects like you in it, but I do tend to have always supported the more sane legal code in the UK then the US as far as crimes and punishments is concern.

I find it amazing that we have ten times per capital prison population then the UK just to start with.

As far as the Texas case is concern I do not off hand think that murderers should be allowed to drag their cases on for so long that they are more likely to die of old age instead of executions.

Decades of appeals and two jury trials should be enough.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 09:54 am
@BillRM,
If evidence exists that could exonerate someone it should be examined at the very least. What's a couple of extra days anyway? Notwithstanding the fact that the death penalty is barbaric.

BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 10:16 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
If evidence exists that could exonerate someone it should be examined at the very least. What's a couple of extra days anyway? Notwithstanding the fact that the death penalty is barbaric.


It not a matter of days and once more there should be some end point and decades and two trials should be enough.

As far as barbaric being concern that is up to the citizens of the US if they wish that punishment available or not.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 10:44 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
What a load of old bollocks,
you never miss an opportunity to slag off the UK.
Explain "slag off" ??
What is an old bollock?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 10:46 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
It not a matter of days


You need to use more efficient labs, there's guys in Switzerland who could turn it round in a couple of days. It should have been analysed as a matter of course the minute it was discovered anyway.

BillRM wrote:
As far as barbaric being concern that is up to the citizens of the US if they wish that punishment available or not.


That doesn't make it any less barbaric.
BillRM
 
  -1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 10:48 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
That doesn't make it any less barbaric.


You are free to think if is barbaric all you care to but why do the rest of us need to care what a foreigner opinion happen to be concerning that punishment being available or not?
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 10:52 am
@BillRM,
You're the one who wants to adopt our laws, so you need to know what's barbaric about yours. You can't have it both ways.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:05 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
What a load of old bollocks, you never miss an opportunity to slag off the UK.
BillRM wrote:
As far as the Texas case is concern I do not off hand think
that murderers should be allowed to drag their cases on for so long
that they are more likely to die of old age instead of executions.

Decades of appeals and two jury trials should be enough.
That is an OUTRAGE, beyond ineffability. See how u 'd like it,
if it happened to u. IF new evidence exonerates the prisoner,
then that proves that the justice system sodomized him.
In such an event, it is proven that defendant is more innocent
than the judge and the jury who raped him out of his life.
According to Bill, if the putative homicide victim returns upon the scene intact,
the prisoner 's death warrant shud be executed anyway????
If not, then what is the difference in principle qua
exculpation by DNA??

I support the death penalty as an expression of the victim's right
to get even
It is avenging the victim. If homicide is barbaric,
then the criminal shud not have done it; i.e., the criminal brought
the death penalty on himself IF HE WAS GUILTY of homicide
or other extreme abuse.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:07 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

You're the one who wants to adopt our laws,
so you need to know what's barbaric about yours.
You can't have it both ways.
Invite him over there.
BillRM
 
  0  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:33 am
@izzythepush,
Sorry I can cheerfully agree with a part of your justice system over our system with out any need to hear from you what parts of ours that you happen to disagree with.

The very idea that your women are not allow even to have a token means to defend themselves from rapists such as a small container of pepper spay is crazy in my opinion but it is your women that you are so uncaring about.

I am free to agree with sections of your criminal codes and disagree with others so I can indeed have it "both" ways in that regards.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:41 am
@firefly,
You're still ignoring IzzytheLiar's post, ff.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:43 am
@Bentinie,
You aren't interested in facts I see, Beanie. You'll certainly fit in well here. Keep
huggin' ff and izzy.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:47 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Invite him over there.


No thanks.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:52 am
@izzythepush,
You distort everything you touch, Izzy. You are a liar of epic proportions. You remind me of that aide in "Yes Minister", always seeking some way to mislead, obfuscate, lie, always twisting things to your nefarious ends.

And you certainly have found a kindred soul in ff, Ms Sanctimonious herself.
firefly
 
  2  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:54 am
@BillRM,
Quote:

Firefly have even gone to the point of putting keys words into her own postings so she could then claim that a google search would find my comments on computer security and therefore aid pedophiles.

You say all sorts of crazy, and absolutely untrue, things about me all the time, but that one is really off the wall. You're paranoid, you're nuts, and you particularly have a sick obsession with me.

The more you try to explain why people draw the wrong conclusions about you, whether it's other posters at A2K, or those people in the park, the worse you sound because you're so clearly rationalizing and denying the behaviors, and opinions, and information, all supplied by you, that other people are basing their conclusions on.

You always see yourself as the innocent persecuted party, you have no idea how you impress other people, and consequently, you take no responsibility for the provocations you instigate or the image of yourself you project. You're the one responsible for your own reputation at A2K, try as you might to blame it on other people, because all the information it's based on came directly from you. You have no idea how much your comments reveal about you, apart from what you intend. And you never know when to shut up, so you always dig yourself in deeper.

JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:54 am
@izzythepush,
were caught trying to entice children in the park with kittens. Your first wife got a restraining order against you for violence which you did not challenge.



You're doing it again, IzzytheLiar.

Izzytheliar: Those are all facts, present them any way you want, it does not look good.

They are not in any way facts. They are a steaming pile of Izzy distortions. In actuality it doesn't look good for you, Iz. How can you expect anyone to trust anything you say about anything? Especially when you seek to hide yourself away in your dank little ignore hole. That's where you like to keep your "truths", in the dark, where you can manipulate them at will.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:59 am
@JTT,
Your needs for attention are pathetic, JTT.

It's sad to see you groveling, and trying to provoke responses this way. It's hard to be an attention-whore malicious troll when you're being ignored, isn't it?

http://www.fatwallet.com/static/attachments/thumbnails/29773_258troll_spray.jpg
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:00 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:

Firefly have even gone to the point of putting keys words into her own postings so she could then claim that a google search would find my comments on computer security and therefore aid pedophiles.

You say all sorts of crazy, and absolutely untrue, things about me all the time, but that one is really off the wall. You're paranoid, you're nuts, and you particularly have a sick obsession with me.



Even if what he said was true, (it's not), there's no getting over the fact that BillRM, not Firefly, posted the link to child pornography sites.

There's no good reason for doing that.
JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:05 pm
@firefly,
You still haven't addressed IzzytheLiar's post, ff.

So typical of you, flee or throw up ff crap when you're lost.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  -3  
Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:09 pm
@izzythepush,
Izzytheliar: Even if what he said was true, (it's not), there's no getting over the fact that BillRM, not Firefly, posted the link to child pornography sites.

***************************************

How, pray tell do you know that, izzy?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 03:53:53