So Saying That Folks Should Follow Christian Morals is NOW A Firing Offense

@izzythepush,

It's also true that it was only in threads about child pornography, and in more than one thread on the topic, that BillRM began offering his tips on computer security, because he felt one problem was that those possessing child porn were getting caught because they lacked the proper security to prevent law enforcement from accessing the illegal material on their computers, and he bragged about how the government wouldn't be able to find anything he had hidden on his computer.

So, particularly in child pornography threads, he offered tips on how to secure your computer to prevent access to stored material, plus he offered up all sorts of info about the "Darknet", where more illegal child pornography material could be found. This was followed up by BillRM's arguing that minimum sentencing for those convicted of possessing and distributing child porn should be lowered, plus his arguing that various forms of child porn were essentially innocuous.

What BillRM completely failed to be aware of was that the totality of his remarks were in sympathy with those who seek and share and collect child pornography, and designed to help them in that endeavor, and completely denied the harm to the children exploited and abused in the process.

He created a certain impression of himself, that he did all by himself, simply by the types of comments he made in more than one thread on child pornography. He creates his own image, and when he doesn't like the way others are seeing him, he then blames everyone but himself.

1 Reply

@JTT,

Your needs for attention are growing even more pathetic and desperate, JTT.

It's both sad and funny to see you groveling, and trying to provoke responses this way. It's hard to be an attention-whore malicious troll when you're being ignored, isn't it?

http://www.fatwallet.com/static/attachments/thumbnails/29773_258troll_spray.jpg

3 Replies

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Your needs for attention are growing even more pathetic and desperate, JTT.

It's both sad and funny to see you groveling, and trying to provoke responses this way.
It's hard to be an attention-whore malicious troll when you're being ignored, isn't it?

HAPPY NEW YEAR, Firefly!
Your eloquence is singularly adroit !

David

0 Replies

@firefly,

Ff the sanctimonious sweetheart who cares not at all, speaks not at all for the millions the USA slaughters, jumps on her manure spreader and gives it full throttle, spreading more of her steaming piles of bullshit all over hell's half acre.

0 Replies

@firefly,

You still haven't addressed IzzytheLiar's post.

0 Replies

One effing philandering, drug addicted and alcoholic defending another. Both hypocrites, who pray and worship the Almighty Dollar!

Franklin Graham chides Christians for not fighting beside Phil Robertson in ‘religious war

Quote:

In a statement issued on Monday, Franklin Graham — son of legendary televangelist Billy Graham and CEO of his Evangelical Association — complained about Christians who were unwilling to fight beside Phil Robertson in the “religious war against Christians and the biblical truths [they] stand for.”

“I appreciate the Robertson family’s strong commitment to biblical principles and their refusal to back down under intense media pressure over Phil Robertson’s comments in a recent interview,” Graham wrote. “As the Robertson controversy winds down—at least for now—I have been amazed at how many churches have apparently ‘ducked’ out on the issue (sin).”

He chastised those churches that “have fallen into the trap of being politically correct, under the disguise of tolerance.”

“God is not ‘politically correct,’” he wrote, “and He is certainly not tolerant of sin.”

He continued by noting that “[t]he Bible tells us that He is going to judge all sin one day; and anyone who is not found under the blood of His Son, Jesus Christ, will face an eternity in hell separated from God.”

Graham’s remarks echo Robertson’s, in that he stresses that pointing out that God will judge a person to be a sinner isn’t the same as personally judging someone to have sinned.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Franklin-Graham-apologizes.jpg

1 Reply

@firefly,

You are providing attention when you address it and use its screen name.

1 Reply

@ehBeth,

Your grammar is as bad as Setanta's, Beth.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

Even if what he said was true, (it's not), there's no getting over the fact that BillRM, not Firefly, posted the link to child pornography sites.

You are crazy as I never posted the links to any child porn sites and in fact do not and have never known the addresses of any such sites either on the net or the dark net for that matter.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

More bollocks, I clearly remember you doing so, your excuse being that it was easily accessible anyway. You did do it, your denials are pathetic. When will you man up and take responsibility for your own actions.

3 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

When will you man up and take responsibility for your own actions.

In the world you live in, people don't do that. Why ask Bill to do something you don't believe in?

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Izzytheprofligateliar: When will you man up and take responsibility for your own actions.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

You need to check the dictionary too, izzy.

0 Replies

@izzythepush,

Quote:

I clearly remember you doing so, your excuse being that it was easily accessible anyway.

Sorry dear heart as never knowing any such sites addresses, I could hardly provide links to any such sites.

I have stated that most p2p networks have files listed that by names and claims was of child porn but I did not know whether those files was or was not child porn as I was not crazy enough to downloads any such files to see one way or another.

P2P networks are not web sites but files sharing networks and 99.9999 percent of their content have nothing to do with child porn real or fake.

Most users of such networks are looking for music or ebooks or videos that once more have nothing to do with child porn.

1 Reply

@Thomas,

Quote:

While that is true as a legal matter, many of us also consider the freedom of speech an ethical value---including myself. If you no longer dare to speak your mind because political activists will come after your job if you do, that, too, abridges your freedom of speech, and that, too, is a bad thing. Private organizations are perfectly willing and able to mess with one's political freedoms. And it's part of what happened here.

No one's "political freedoms" were messed with.

A & E, as a private corporation, was free to fire or retain Robertson, based on their business interests. And they should be free to do that. Robertson represents their brand, and his employer can cut ties with him if they feel he's damaging their brand.

Robertson was not, and is not, prevented from expressing his opinions, but it's up to him whether he's willing to take the consequences for what he says. Whether A & E takes action against him, or consumers stop buying his duck whistles, he does risk consequences by his choice to publicly voice controversial remarks.

And the advocacy groups, for the LGBT community, and the black community, and for the faith-based and religious right wing communities, were all free to voice their opinions, and they all did.

I really can't see where anyone's "freedoms" were violated. No one has unlimited freedom, to do or say anything they want to, with a guarantee of no negative reactions or consequences. And that's always been the case.

Look, in every day life we're careful about we say because we know our speech has consequences. You generally don't tell your wife or close female friend, when she's wearing her favorite dress or swim suit, that it makes her look fat and dumpy and unattractive, even if she asks your opinion, unless you want to deal with the consequences.

The irony of the situation with Robertson is that, particularly regarding his remarks about gays and blacks, he's the one who'd most probably like to take away, or limit, other people's "freedoms"--that's what his brand of fundamentalist "Christian morality" is all about. So he's an odd choice as a rallying point on the issue of "freedom".

1 Reply

@izzythepush,

You know this because you bookmarked them in your computer, Iz?

1 Reply

@JTT,

Quote:

You know this because you bookmarked them in your computer, Iz?

Even on the dark net child porn sites are not out in the open as are drugs and weapons sites happen to be.

I can give you the dark net address of the silk road two where people buy and sell drugs and sites that claimed they will shipped weapons to any part of the world including the UK but not one child porn site.

2 Replies

@BillRM,

This is about the 3rd or 4th time I've made this charge yet you only challenge it now. Why is that? If I'm wrong now, I was wrong then.

You know you're talking bollocks, you only address people as 'dear heart,' when you know you're in the wrong.

I suspect you're hiding behind semantics. I didn't click on the link you posted, the very idea disgusts me, so I can't say with 100% certainty where it lead, but you were very proud of the fact that you'd posted a link to the dark web, with all the ramifications that entails. Maybe you didn't post a link directly to a child pornography website, but you posted a link to somewhere one could access it with a couple more clicks.

In any event, if someone was looking for child pornography and they came across your post it would have been more easier to access it without being detected by the relevant authorities.

That was something you consciously and deliberately did. Man up.

2 Replies

@firefly,

Thomas mentioned "ethical value". Obviously that's the part that you can't wrap your head around.

0 Replies

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

Even on the dark net child porn sites are not out in the open as are drugs and weapons sites happen to be.

You certainly know a lot about it.

2 Replies

@BillRM,

Quote:

I can give you the dark net address of the silk road two where people buy and sell drugs and sites that claimed they will shipped weapons to any part of the world including the UK but not one child porn site.

That sounds like you searched for the child porn sites...

You seem to have an interest in the sorts of illegal things one can find on the darknet, including child pornography, that I can't recall any other poster at A2K talking about, let alone pointing other people to.

1 Reply

So Saying That Folks Should Follow Christian Morals is NOW A Firing Offense

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know