The rule of thumb for edged weapons is that if the attacker is within 21 feet of you, there isn't enough time to safely react to his attack if your gun is in the holster.
I am not in favor of a national database. Here's why:
Quote:They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
- Benjamin Franklin
Over the years the gun control laws have eaten away at our freedoms one tiny bite at a time. It's like being nibbled to death by ducks, or the analogy of the lobster in the cooking pot where the heat is turned up very slowly. You don't notice your rights are gone until you wake up one day and the police are at your door to confiscate all your guns. It's a slippery slope, but it's not one of the logical fallacies because we have already slid partway down the slope.
My question to those of you who advocate a national database of every gun in the country is, would you advocate a similar database for swords? And if not, why not?
I have more questions saved for later, but this is enough for now. :wink: