@coldjoint,
Wow. Someone at the National Review needs to take a class in reading comprehension. Paragraph 36 does not give Iran 50 days to refuse access to a suspicious site. It gives Iran a 50 day process to complain that any of the EU+5 group isn't holding up their obligations under the deal. The EU+5 obligations have nothing to do with what sites Iran has to let inspectors visit. For instance if Trump were to become President and refuse to lift sanctions as required under the agreement, then Iran could start the process by lodging a complaint and after 50 days if it is voted on that the US has failed to live up to it's obligations then Iran could pull out of the agreement. Because the US would be the party failing to live up the agreement, other countries would not be obligated to put sanctions in place again.
But you keep not thinking, Pinkie. It's what you are so good at.
If the IAEA requests access to a site and is refused, there is nothing to prevent the IAEA from monitoring activity outside the site. It's not like Iran can put centrifuges on invisible magic carpets to fly them out of that site. In fact, that would be the normal procedure to monitor the exterior of such a site until access is granted.
I would suggest you read the full text of the deal yourself Pinkie, but I know that is beyond your capabilities. You have to have someone else do your thinking for you so just keep not thinking, Pinkie. It's what you are good at.