@cicerone imposter,
Quote:Does he understand anything about how governments work? Once elected, they can declare war whether we agree with it or not. I've written to my congresswoman, Diane Feinstein, not to approve the Iraq war, but she told me they had information that required them to approve the president's request for war.
We later found out I was right and the government was wrong; there were no WMD's found in Iraq.
Why is there this common theme that runs thru virtually all of the US, it's brought up in every election, it's hammered home time and again - people have to be held responsible for their actions. Little people constantly go to jail for minor crimes or more serious ones.
Point out one US president, CI, that has been required to accept any responsibility for what are, according to laws established by the US, war crimes and terrorism.
Just look at your two hands, palms up, as a scale. Now weigh what has been the actual damage done by Bradley Manning or George Bush. It has never been established that anyone has been killed because of B Manning, though it's often been pimped as this big deal. Consider G Bush's side, how many dead, how many lives ruined, how much damage done to both sides, US and Iraq.
Quote:The Kellogg–Briand Pact (or Pact of Paris, officially General Treaty for Renunciation of War as an Instrument of National Policy[1]) was a 1928 international agreement in which signatory states promised not to use war to resolve "disputes or conflicts of whatever nature or of whatever origin they may be, which may arise among them".[2] Parties failing to abide by this promise "should be denied the benefits furnished by this treaty".
Who's in jail, who's contemplating some serious jail time, which man has caused the greatest damage?