63
   

What are your pet peeves re English usage?

 
 
Francis
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 03:36 am
David wrote:
The momentum of my humility is indefatigable and exceeded only by the vigor of my modesty.


You have to be pulling our collective leg.. Shocked
Joeblow
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 06:59 am
@cicerone imposter,
(Sticks out tongue)

Trips c.i.
0 Replies
 
Joeblow
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 07:00 am
@JTT,
O.K. Perhaps “I seen it” has gone from nails on a blackboard to repetitive finger drumming.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 07:49 am
@Joeblow,
I can smell where yer comin' from . . .
Joeblow
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 08:03 am
@Setanta,
That's because you miss nothing my furry friend.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 11:19 am
@aidan,
Quote:
And I, spendi, is vindicated, validated and peer-reviewed.


Quote:
Huh? Shouldn't that be:
'And I, spendi, AM vindicated, validated and peer-reviewed' ?!

What is happening to your grammar?

(JTT - this HAS to qualify as a legitimate mistake or at least an understandable peeve, if someone were to get peeved at people making grammatical mistakes).


It doesn't appear to be Standard English, Aidan, and anyone who wished to could peeve to their heart's content. But as is so often the case, a little thinking or a bit of research shows most peeves to be less than well thought out ideas.

It's not always the easiest thing to parse Spendi's language. He hasn't seemed to be able to explain it himself.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 12:20 pm
@Francis,
Francis wrote:

David wrote:
The momentum of my humility is indefatigable and exceeded only by the vigor of my modesty.


You have to be pulling our collective leg.. Shocked
U think ?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 12:54 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
It can also serve to assure the hearer that
he is being truthful and not joking, nor is he exagerating.
Accordingly, those frases can serve a useful purpose.


I'm inclined to think that phrases such as "to be perfectly frank and honest, serve the purpose of allowing a speaker to gob off for longer than than what he/she has to say justifies. They are woffle.

I was offering "thote" as an alternative to your "thawt". Not for a moment, if I was to absolutely and scupulously stick to the facts with unambiguous and downright plain-speaking and a pious attitude of sincerity, did I suggest, nor even think, that you had used "thote". I was wondering why you preferred "thawt" and why you have a non-ironical or non-satirical objection to "thought", as I explained I have sometimes indulged in, which passes the eye during reading in the manner which the dainty flowers on a freshly starched print frock do whereas "thawt" is more akin to a grubby stain on the pattern of suspicious derivation from which one might reasonably conclude that the wearer was unfamiliar with Mrs Ellis's advice to the Daughters of England: a seminal work in the genre.
Joeblow
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 12:55 pm
@JTT,
It was my favourite line…a lovely chuckle.

It defined the post.

You didn't smile even a little?
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:01 pm
@spendius,
He spells it 'thawt' because he's a New Yawkah and that's how they say it. I've probably heard him say it- I can't remember specifically if he said the word 'thought' or not- but yeah, probably.

I smiled at that line: And I spendi, is validated....blah, blah,blah- because when you HEAR it - it sounds like, I Spendi-is - get it spendiis - spendius...
I knew he did it on purpose. He was testing our proofreading skills.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:05 pm
Today, pretty much the whole damned language pisses me off . . .
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:06 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
You seem to have a problem with "educated".


I have had no problem with "educated" ever since a chap in the pub who I had previously though a bit short in the head rewired, in short order, a building in which I had an interest and positioned and connected up all the machines. Some of which weighed half a ton.

I think your use of the term is not only uncharitable but also an indiscreet method whereby you attempt to claim some spurious ascendency for your own attainments but ends up revealing how botched and bungled your own education has so far been. Your a snob.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:33 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Talcum powder is good after a shower; do u agree with that ?


No. The sort of ladies acceptable to my tastes are those who prefer the undisguised aroma of maleness.

But I never shower anyway. I take a half hour soak in the bath every night because it helps get up a thirst and I like being immersed in hot water.

I think showers are for people who feel grubby and do not care for relaxation and the inevitable thinking that goes with it. Relaxation in showers seemed to me impossible when I tried it many years ago. The persistent thought is "I am being showered" but in a hot soak in the bath one's mind can wander over the doings of the world with freedom which some people don't care for as they have a vague notion that if they do there is a good chance they will discover what a silly asshole they are when the evidence is considered.

I think that is the reason for a great deal of the frenzied activity they engage in when their ablutions are over.

Discovering that one is a silly asshole is the first rung of the ladder in a proper education. Educational systems in which a larger and larger number of silly assholes are flattered into thinking they are well above average for the purpose of expanding business empires and keeping unemployment statistics respectable, manageable, are deeply flawed from an educational point of view. When the victims of such a system can win an election I'm inclined to think the rot has set in.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:44 pm
@Merry Andrew,
gb wrote--

Quote:
I think you could describe his/her obsession as a peevish display of meglomania.


What gb doesn't seem to have discovered yet, nor MA, is that the peevish exercise of meglomaniacal tendencies is the very reason we come on A2K, and other similar fairground attractions, because in our daily lives we get so few chances, if any, to indulge in such perfectly natural tendencies which evolution has ensured we are all born with.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 01:52 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
He DID it.
I thawt this was an egregious error on his part, unsanitary, but none of my business.
Somehow, in the back of my mind, I remain uncertain of whether I was correct
to respect his autonomy and remain silent.


You were correct. Had you admonished him you might well have caused him to have a life-long aversion to licking objects you deem to be dirty.

And there's Father Conmee's resisting a desire to admonish a young kid for lighting a cigarette in Ulysses which all educated persons would know and thus not be uncertain about.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 02:09 pm
I think Jagger's "I can't get no satisfaction" is a complaint concerning his problems with premature ejaculation in his early career.

Here's a puzzling example --"Either I'm too sensitive or else I'm getting soft."
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 03:27 pm
@Joeblow,
I did, ... smile that is.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 05:24 pm
@JTT,
Tamely I assume.
0 Replies
 
glitterbag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2009 10:40 pm
Well I learned something today, both Spendius and JTT must only be able to engage via forums on those computer thingies. And one of you, can't remember which, used peeve as a verb.....Christ, it can't get better than this. The two of you are a complete waste of time and you have as much intellectual curiosity as Bush 43. It must be a wonderful state to be in when you never question yourself. And it is is tres amusing to read the stuff you type here. Thanks to both of you, if I ever had any doubt about my intellectual ability, all I have to do is revisit the nonsense you have posted here for an ego reinforcement.

I hope none of this is offensive, my Dad said it didn't say much about a person who wanted to match wits with children or defectives, so on one level if he was still among the living he would disapprove....however, if he had a chance to read the manure you are spreading, he would be a much harsher critic than I of these feeble attempts the two of you have made in an effort to appear smart. But Dad didn't suffer fools, on the other hand I like to take a few minutes to determine if the stupid questions are actually sincere. Sadly they are not, but really ....what difference does it make, there is no value added listening to bloviators, they only care about the sound of their own voice. Have fun children, I'll check in from time to time and post when I am bored to tears.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Aug, 2009 12:50 am
@glitterbag,

Clary packed it in because she couldn't stand Spendy's carping, and that was sad.

Shame.
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 10:27:36