@JTT,
Quote:Good dog, Spendi, is this another one of the language "sources" in your library that has helped you to be the incompetent you are when it comes to describing language issues?
This is ridiculous JT. That's just another of a long line of unsupported assertions which I notice continues unabated in the subsequent posts. The unsupported assertion is meaningless and isn't language at all. The point made based on the assertion isn't a point. What's the sense in arguing about language using meaningless constructions making no point.
I don't even know if I have been describing language issues.
I use language having been influenced by others who use language. I have vague notions about old fashioned subjunctives and none at all about gerunds, dangling participles and what not. Nor do I care. I am neither competent nor incompetent regarding describing language issues or using language. What you see is what you get. Like it or lump it.
Those were the first words I have ever read from S&W. I came across them looking for something else on Wiki.
Quote:Next you'll be quoting from Fowler.
It's very unlikely. I do have two copies of Fowler and one of Partridge but I don't consult them much. The English section in my library is about a yard wide, reaches to the ceiling and has eight overfull shelves. "Overfull" being an image those with overfull bookshelves will understand. I have Roger's Profanisaurus (a joke about us gents being in favour of causing sore fannies), The Lecher's Lexicon, The Right Word At The Right Time, Linguistics for Genteel Folks, Linguistics Made Simple, The Slang Thesaurus, Dictionaries galore, Mencken, and a ****-load of other stuff. I even have a vintage, excellently tooled Lempriere and I can support the assertion of excellence if I have to.
Quote:The Elements of Style does not deserve the enormous esteem in which it is held by American college graduates. Its advice ranges from limp platitudes to inconsistent nonsense. Its enormous influence has not improved American students' grasp of English grammar; it has significantly degraded it.
I consider that to be drivel. Indeed it is drivel. Pullum by name and pull-um by nature. No wonder you have assertivitus' dance. A power kick lacking the force to give it a point.