Utah Sherrifs Warn Obunga, Federal Agencies

There is an ever growing list of Law Enforcement Agencies nationwide that have
made it clear that they will not enforce Obama's American disarmament plan.

Where were these defenders of liberty when the Patriot act was enacted?

Rap

Obama and his ilk will have a real fight on their hands if they push their American disarmament plan

In other news, mice vote to bell the cat.

Sheriff Scott Berry on National Television – Nails It!

I loved it, DrewDad.

Actually, this is the first meaningful proof that some of the sheriffs in Utah are nuts.

Anyway, Gunga...aren't you one of the people who have been saying that gun control laws do not have a prayer of being passed.

So what is the point of this post?

Proof that Obama and his ilk are wrong - dead wrong.

Or...proof that you guys are! All in the eyes of the beholder!

You are free to make the false assumption you have made.

I didn't make an "assumption" in the post that you referenced, H2O...let alone a false one.

You and your ilk sure are an irrational gang

Yeah? You oughta try being on the outside looking at what you write.

One is reminded of the adage about stones and glass houses.

The fact that these brave Americans fully support the US constitution is reassuring.

Better explain that one to him DD. He probebly thinks it goes people who throw glass houses at stones, ect. ect..

I think what has been left out of these "gun threads" is that not only is there the debate whether it is guns or people that kill people, but that guns SCARE people. That being said, the U.S. has maintained its primacy in technological innovation (aka, profitable corporations=wealthier shareholders=elite going to Heaven, as a Divine sign) by attracting to our shores the "best and brightest" from other countries. The truth be known, even with 300+ Americans, the U.S. does not have enough truly talented citizens to stay ahead of all foreign competition. Plus, by attracting the "best and brightest" from other countries, to the U.S., we are doing a bit of preventive maintanance in preventing other countries from optimizing their "best and brightest."

So, since gun ownership correlates to "true-blue" American types that love their guns, and trucks, and dogs, etc., these Americans are hard enough to live with as a neighbor, if one is from a less gun-toting country, let alone if the thought was only to borrow a cup of sugar from a neighbor, and the neighbor is one with a gun in a gun rack. An exaggeration, but the point is that guns scare people, especially many of the new immigrants that add to the value of corporate America.

So, the interpretation of the Second Amendment might be antithetical to the U.S. being a country for new money and old money to make more wealth, by attracting the "best and brightest," and gun adverse from the other nations of the world. In effect, the business of the country is business, not really was it the goal of keeping the masses at their "comfort level" when they go to sleep at night, in my opinion. This was always a country for the wealthy to truly enjoy, and own land, etc., and not for the working stiff to maintain a level of comfort, in my opinion again.

Lastly, just because the U.S. doesn't have a monarchy, doesn't mean it doesn't have an aristocracy of sorts, whose primary goal is to make money, since their protection is maintained by the people they hire for that job. In my opinion, we citizens are mostly like the deer in the king's forest; we think the forest is ours; however, the people in the castle know better.

Guns do scare the ignorant and under-informed

Why must you constantly assert that people who disagree with you MUST BE ignorant and under-informed?

Do you honestly think you are exceptionally intelligent...and exceptionally informed...

...or are you simply addicted to being unnecessarily rude?