Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

To tell you the truth...I would not be at all surprised if Bill smokes, or decorates Christmas trees etc...(whatever other analogy he used) And the very reasons why he says them is because he knows deep down it may not be so good of an idea for him to own a gun himself...but does not believe in all the morality "hokus-pokus"...

<lag>

Meanwhile since that 2006 report you are quoting..

http://www.npr.org/2011/07/15/137859024/rethinking-sids-many-deaths-no-longer-a-mystery

Nope. It isn't second hand smoke that causes SIDS.

But you claimed a large percentage of the deaths from second hand smoke are children. Are you backing away from that now?
Perhaps you can tell us which diseases are caused by second hand smoke in children. I will be happy to look up the number of those under 24 that died from that disease. It won't be a large percentage of the number you claim died from second hand smoke. It will be less than 1%.

Yet you are the ones who wish to sacrifice the lives of our children

You lie... you are a liar, formerman.

Youve stepped in it all by yourself


What weve spent on eradicating smoking while still retaining the business of tobacco and tobacco farming would fund a gazillion modifications of guns and school retrofits and gun control provisions.
Remember, you brought it up .

ANY DEATH that can be made preventable should be investigated as such.

Over 350 Sheriff’s Will Support Our 2nd Amendment Rights!

All the cards are in your hands, H2O. The people who you think want to take your guns away CANNOT POSSIBLY WIN...according to everything you have posted.

So why are you still so paranoid?

Is it just that you are naturally a very paranoid person?

Paranoid? No, not me.

Aware of the situation? Yes I am.

Ignorant of the situation? Yes you are, FrankA.

ALL OF THE CARDS ARE IN YOUR HANDS...which you regularly point out...and you still are acting paranoidal, H2O.

So the questions remain:

Why are you still so paranoid on this issue?

Is it just that you are naturally a very paranoid person?

Sorry if you go by the standards that preventing deaths for any reason is the over riding priority then in my opinion we would end up living in a society that would not be worth living in.

Big mother on a large scale that will tell us what to eat, drink, and what hobbies and so on with out end......................

But then the anti gun crowd clearly do not wish to live in such a world either they just wish to used the acts of a few mad men to justify the disarming of the American people against all logic.

They will even try to claimed against the CDC and other medical information that smoking around infants and children do not in fact results in far larger numbers of deaths to children then firearms happen to every year.

Having a home full of smoke with children in them is fine and we do not need to address that with congressional hearings and new laws but we do need to removed all firearms from all homes for the safety of the children!!!!!!!!

You and others are clearly hipocrites when it come to the stated reasons you wish to disarmed the American people.

Now there is a bit of philosophy for the ages!

I am not paranoid, I am aware of the dire situation that threatens this constitutional republic.

I am not ignorant of the situation as you are, FrankA, I am well informed.

Well...some paranoids ARE well-informed.

Let's assume you are "well-informed."

If you are, you have to understand that there is no way any meaningful legislation will ever pass this congress...and any that passes will be declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

YOU HAVE SAID SO YOURSELF ON A COUPLE OF OCCASIONS...and others who oppose any new gun regulations have said it also.

And you guys all have said that even if passed and gotten past the Supreme Court...most law enforcement people will not enforce the laws.

SO...why are you still so paranoid...or is it just that you are a naturally a paranoidal person?

Let's assume that you suddenly had half a brain instead of
an empty skull, FrankA. ... nope, can't picture that scenario.

I guess you have decided to ignore current CDC information and instead use some outdated claims. Good for you.

More children don't die from second hand smoke than die from guns. No CDC death numbers support your idiotic claims.

Number of 0-24 that die from SIDS per year - about 2000. (Of which zero are currently attributed to second hand smoke.)
Number of 0-24 that die from gun shots every year? - 6507.

Kind of makes what MM thinks look like something out of a fantasy world.

The NRA and a few gun owners, I'll say it again because it's true, oppose any and all efforts to monitor and regulate gun sales. They are responsible, because of their paranoid delusions about defending the Republic and even more bizarre beliefs about the necessity for secrecy regarding ownership of firearms, for both the flood of guns available on the streets of this nation and the resulting carnage caused by Americans' propensity to shoot one another rather than find other ways of solving problems.

It's a shameful legacy for the NRA.

Joe(they are allowing thousands of preventable deaths to happen)Nation

Excellent summation, XX, I can't wait to read the gun advocates' answer to Lola.

Joe(They do not want to confront other gun owners about being responsible lest they get shot.)Nation

So the NRA didn't write the Tiahrt amendment? Would you say that the Tiahrt Amendment supports your contention that gun owners want gun laws fully enforced?

Joe(huh?)Nation