64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
RexRed
 
  2  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:25 pm
Taft High School Shooting: Suspect In Custody In Taft, California
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/taft-high-school-shooting_n_2449261.html
Val Killmore
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:26 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:

What a great braying jackass . . . i made no such claim. So now you have to lie about what i've written in order to have something to sneer at. You're pathetic.


Old man must I remind you to take your Alzheimer's pill. Poor old limp dick can't tell the difference between a lie and a fact. I didn't lie about what you wrote. You were talking about how it was not unconstitutional to ban assault weapons, and I replied that only ignorant naïve loons fooled by politicians, in the first place, would be sheeps and go along without questioning the definition set in place that defines what an "assault" weapon is, as defined in the AWB that expired. Sheeps who are in favor of fearful emotions that are used to garner support for legislation that the politicians promise will make us safer. And a great lot that did, and by that I'm talking about Columbine. Do you see a lot of fear mongering sheep where you live in Canada?
firefly
 
  3  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:32 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
the NRA's front is more fearsome than its reality. Most of the candidates they backed lost in the last elections. and a significant number of their members disagree with the leadership.

And that's why the time is right to challenge their domination of gun policies/politics in this country. Not only is their political clout relatively insignificant in terms of their influence on election outcomes, they are not speaking for a majority of gun owners in this country--their most solid constituency seems to be the more paranoid fringe, whose more extremist fears they, and the gun manufacturers, constantly stoke.

If the NRA continues to maintain its intractable position it will be left out of the discussion seeking solutions to the gun violence problem, it will marginalize its influence even more. We cannot deal with this problem without some willingness to compromise on everyone's part. The issue right now is not the right of responsible gun owners to possess appropriate weapons for self defense, or home defense, or hunting, or target shooting, nor is that right under attack, nor is this the beginning of a government gun ban to be followed by a seizure of everyone's guns, despite the attempts of the NRA to frame the discussion that way.

The issue right now is how to reduce the unacceptable amount of gun violence that goes on in this country every day, and that is increasingly eroding the quality of life, and the health and safety of a great many Americans. And, to approach that issue, we have to look at the products on the consumer market that contribute to the problem, and we have to look at the distribution channels for these products, and we have to look at how we regulate access to these products since they are obviously not always winding up in responsible hands.

This is not really a 2nd Amendment issue--it's a public health and safety issue. This is not about "gun rights"--guns have no rights--which is why we can, and should, regulate the availability and sale of certain firearms consumer products on the marketplace, for reasons of public health and safety, just as we do for every other product that is made available for sale to the public.

It's time to focus the discussion on the real issue right now--which is how best to reduce the gun violence that impacts our public welfare--and do that without paranoid hysteria, without scenarios of dictators disarming the public, without scenarios of the need to re-fight another armed revolution against the government. Our democracy is firmly in place, and we will maintain its strength considerably better by exercising our First Amendment rights of free speech and assembly, and our strength at the ballot box, then we ever will by trying to turn our entire citizenry into an armed force, fearful of each other, and scrambling to acquire and stockpile the most lethal weapons they can get their hands on.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:34 pm
@firefly,
Over the last 18 days NRA membership has grown by over 100K.

The NRA is huge and it is growing.

firefly wrote:

It's time to focus the discussion on the real issue right now--which is how best to reduce the gun violence that impacts our public welfare--and do that without paranoid hysteria, without scenarios of dictators disarming the public, without scenarios of the need to re-fight another armed revolution against the government.


The scenario of Obama & Biden disarming the public is real, your referring to them as dictators is scary, but it does sound as though you would entertain an effort to get guns out of the hands of 'known' criminals.

firefly wrote:

Our democracy is firmly in place, and we will maintain its strength considerably better by exercising our First Amendment rights of free speech, and our strength at the ballot box, then we ever will by trying to turn our entire citizenry into an armed force, fearful of each other, and scrambling to acquire and stockpile the most lethal weapons they can get their hands on.


You will not find the word 'democracy' in our constitution - democracy is mob rule and it sucks!
Also, you may find this strange, but aside benefit of our 2nd amendment rights is that they serve to protect our 1st amendment rights.

firefly
 
  3  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:39 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:

The NRA is huge and it is growing.

So is the coalition of responsible citizens, including many gun owners, calling for effective government action to address and reduce our problems with gun violence.
parados
 
  3  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:41 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

Over the last 18 days NRA membership has grown by over 100K.

The NRA is huge and it is growing.

Yep.. I joined just so I can vote out the idiotic top management. Michael Moore is also a voting member.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:43 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Quote:

The NRA is huge and it is growing.

So is the coalition of responsible citizens, including many gun owners, calling for effective government action to address and reduce our problems with gun violence.

Yes, Americans want to get the guns out of the hands of known criminals.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:44 pm
@parados,


MeMeMeMeMe Michael Moore is a hypocritical pig, you and he are close?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 12:56 pm
@Val Killmore,
No, you're just cobbling that bullshit together now. As usual, you have no rhetorical position, so you resort to vicious personal attacks. It is not unconstitutional for the Congress to regulate firearms of any description, you brain-dead idiot. Get over it. Stop spreading lies about what i've written just because you're too f*cking stupid to understand.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:01 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
MontereyJack wrote:
the NRA's front is more fearsome than its reality. Most of the candidates they backed lost in the last elections. and a significant number of their members disagree with the leadership.


And that's why the time is right to challenge their domination of gun policies/politics in this country. Not only is their political clout relatively insignificant in terms of their influence on election outcomes,


Easy to say when you aren't the one we're voting out of office.



firefly wrote:
If the NRA continues to maintain its intractable position it will be left out of the discussion seeking solutions to the gun violence problem, it will marginalize its influence even more.


The NRA's position is hardly intractable. You are confusing them with the GOA.

And the NRA's influence is marginal only in your fantasies.



firefly wrote:
We cannot deal with this problem without some willingness to compromise on everyone's part.


That's pretty funny considering your headlong insistence on banning harmless cosmetic features that there is no reason to ban.

It isn't the NRA who refuses to compromise. It is you.

And it isn't the NRA who is ultimately powerless. It is you.



firefly wrote:
The issue right now is not the right of responsible gun owners to possess appropriate weapons for self defense, or home defense, or hunting, or target shooting, nor is that right under attack,


No, that in fact is exactly what you are attacking.



firefly wrote:
nor is this the beginning of a government gun ban to be followed by a seizure of everyone's guns, despite the attempts of the NRA to frame the discussion that way.


Obama's gun registration plot says otherwise.



firefly wrote:
This is not really a 2nd Amendment issue--it's a public health and safety issue.


No, when you try to violate the Second Amendment, that is a Second Amendment issue.



firefly wrote:
It's time to focus the discussion on the real issue right now--which is how best to reduce the gun violence that impacts our public welfare--and do that without paranoid hysteria,


Well, let us know when you're ready to give up your hysteria over harmless cosmetic features like pistol grips and adjustable stocks.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:02 pm
@H2O MAN,
Stop distorting my remarks. I have no idea whose post you think your responding to, but it definitely isn't mine.

Quote:
The scenario of Obama & Biden disarming the public is real, your referring to them as dictators is scary

I made no reference to either Obama or Biden--who I definitely do not see as being dictators.

I was referring to the paranoid fantasies, including those voiced in this thread, that dredge up images of Hitler, Stalin, etc. at any mention of gun regulation to decrease gun violence.
Quote:
but it does sound as though you would entertain an effort to get guns out of the hands of 'known' criminals..

I made no reference to getting guns out of anyone's hands, or taking guns away from anyone, or a move to leave the public disarmed. I said nothing about known criminals.

I referred to the need to regulate the availability and sale of certain consumer firearms products, for reasons of public health and safety, just as we regulate all other consumer products offered to the general public in our marketplace.

Do you always have this much difficulty accurately comprehending what you read?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:03 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
H2O MAN wrote:
The NRA is huge and it is growing.


So is the coalition of responsible citizens, including many gun owners, calling for effective government action to address and reduce our problems with gun violence.


Good luck matching the voting power of the NRA in rural congressional districts.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:03 pm
Deciding whether ordinary people in the USA should be entrusted with some or all guns, it seems like some sanity is beginning to dawn.
Here is an article from today's Guardian.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/09/obama-executive-action-gun-control-biden?INTCMP=SRCH

Quote:


President Barack Obama is considering the use of an executive order to restrict access to guns or ammunition in the wake of nationwide revulsion in the US over the Connecticut school shootings, vice-president Joe Biden said Wednesday.

Such a move would be deeply controversial in the gun lobby, but Biden said the president was determined to explore every legislative avenue.

"The president is going to act," Biden said in a briefing to reporters before the inaugural meeting of a new national task force on gun control. "Executive order, executive action that can be taken; we haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and all the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action, we believe, is required."

Biden did not specify what kind of action the president might take. In the past the Obama administration has used executive orders, which have the force of law, to require gun dealers to report when customers buy multiple high-powered rifles and to increase penalties for violating gun laws. A new order, nearly certain to face legal challenges, could seek to tighten enforcement of laws governing private sales of guns or to beef up background checks.

"We are not going to get caught up in the notion that unless we can do everything we're going to do nothing," Biden said. "It's critically important that we act."

Any unilateral action by the president seemed sure to inflame gun advocates, who argue that gun sales are protected under the second amendment and who equate gun control with tyranny. Gun-rights groups are organising a "Gun Appreciation Day" on the weekend of the president's second inauguration. The influential conservative website the Drudge Report illustrated the story covering Biden's remarks with pictures of Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin.

Biden said that the 14 December massacre at a Connecticut elementary school, in which 20 first-graders were shot dead in their classrooms by a man armed with a semi-automatic rifle, had mobilised the nation to act.

"Every once in a while there's something that awakens the conscience of the country, and that tragic event did it in a way like nothing I've seen in my career," Biden said.

The national taskforce includes the victims of mass shootings and gun control advocates. The group plans to meet Thursday with representatives of the National Rifle Association and gun retailers including Walmart. The taskforce was to deliver recommendations to the president as early as mid-month.

New York could become the first state to pass gun control laws after the Connecticut massacre, aides to Governor Andrew Cuomo announced in advance of his annual address planned for Wednesday afternoon. Lawmakers in Albany worked late into the night Tuesday to settle on new rules to further restrict the sales of assault rifles and large-capacity magazines, and to require the regular renewal of gun permits, among other measures.

The NRA has vocally opposed calls for new gun control legislation, saying that more guns are needed to improve public safety.

"If it's crazy to call for armed officers in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy," NRA head Wayne LaPierre said a week after the Connecticut shooting. "I think the American people think it's crazy not to do it. It's the one thing that would keep people safe."

Deaths from guns are on pace to surpass traffic deaths in the United States by 2015, according to a Bloomberg News study. In 2011, the latest year for which detailed statistics are available, there were 12,664 murders in the US. Of those, 8,583 were caused by firearms, down 3% from a year earlier.

The Biden taskforce is part of new wave of gun control activity across the country. Former congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, who was shot in the head in a 2011 massacre in Tucson that killed six, announced on Tuesday the formation of a political action committee to fight the NRA.

"Special interests purporting to represent gun owners but really advancing the interests of an ideological fringe have used big money and influence to cow Congress into submission," she wrote in an editorial with husband Mark Kelly, an astronaut. "Rather than working to find the balance between our rights and the regulation of a dangerous product, these groups have cast simple protections for our communities as existential threats to individual liberties."

New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is heading up a campaign called Demand a Plan that has produced dozens of videos in which family members of victims of gun violence call for new gun laws. Advocates have proposed a coalition of mothers against gun violence that would be modeled after Madd, the anti-drunken driving group that succeeded in lowering the legal blood-alcohol content for drivers nationally.

oralloy
 
  0  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:05 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
It is not unconstitutional for the Congress to regulate firearms of any description


Wrong. Any such regulations have to pass muster with Rational Basis Review (or with an even stronger measure of scrutiny).
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:06 pm
@firefly,

Your paranoid fantasies aside, Obama, Biden, Feindstein and other liberal
democrats would love to take the guns away from law abiding Americans.
They would probably use them to continue their 'fast & furious' program.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:08 pm
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

Taft High School Shooting: Suspect In Custody In Taft, California
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/taft-high-school-shooting_n_2449261.html


Another BLUE state shooting?

Say it ain't so.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:14 pm
@oralloy,
That's right, you are wrong again.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:17 pm
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Quote:
... Biden said that the 14 December massacre at a Connecticut elementary school, in which 20 first-graders were shot dead in their classrooms by a man armed with a semi-automatic rifle...



Interesting... so it wasn't an evil assault rifle, it was just a semi-automatic rifle?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:23 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
That's right, you are wrong again.


Nope. When dealing with a Constitutional right, the courts require laws to pass muster with Rational Basis Review (or an even sterner standard of review).
Setanta
 
  1  
Thu 10 Jan, 2013 01:28 pm
@oralloy,
You haven't demonstrated that a ban on assault weapons would not be made on a rational basis. So, as usual, you're just babbling. Do you run over the NRA website to pick up this lame propaganda?
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.81 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 07:32:28