64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 07:57 am
@OmSigDAVID,
I understand what you are saying here, David...but the commentary is logically faulty.

What might make more sense is to suggest that you would go to EVERY K - 4 school in the country and offer guns to ALL those kids...and see if things end up better or worse than they are right now.

Tell me...do you think if EVERY K - 4 group of kids were armed the way you suggest...that shooting events would decrease across the United States? Or would you guess that they might well increase?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 07:58 am
@OmSigDAVID,
By the way...I am no liberal either.

And I am no conservative.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 08:08 am
@OmSigDAVID,

ERRATUM:

" inferred stupidty," shud have been:
inferred stupidity.
0 Replies
 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 08:33 am
@Foofie,
Quote:
the "culture" of boys


I don't see a "reply to all" button. This post isn't really directed at Foofie but her comment is the one that stuck most in my head.

I'm no gun nut and I have no problems with regulating guns (eliminate internet selling of ammunition?, only being able to buy it within your zip code?, other things?) but I am really disturbed when incidents like this school shooting and the recent shooting at a mall near my house, lead to calls for gun control.

Calling for gun control means we're happy to put a band aid on the problem without addressing the reasons that some young men are so angry that they do things like this.

Dressing our schools up like prisons and zero tolerance policies aren't addressing the real problem. Neither are gun controls. They might make some people (not me) feel safer but they don't address the real issue.

And I don't think it's just a mental health issue, it's an emotional health issue.

I'm all for America having a real debate about guns and gun control but I worry that the true problem, "boy culture" as Foofie put it, will go unexamined if me make this all about gun control.

OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 08:50 am
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:

I understand what you are saying here, David...but the commentary is logically faulty.

What might make more sense is to suggest that you would go to EVERY K - 4 school in the country and offer guns to ALL those kids...and see if things end up better or worse than they are right now.

Tell me...do you think if EVERY K - 4 group of kids were armed the way you suggest...that shooting events would decrease across the United States? Or would you guess that they might well increase?
It was only an idle dream qua time-travel.

As a practical matter, I advocate teaching swimming (against drowning),
at the earliest possible ages in school.
For the same life-saving reasons, I advocate that school children
be trained in practical and applied defense from the predatory
violence of animals or of criminals, including optimal use of handguns
and defensive battle tactics. Those kindergarteners NEEDED*
defensive guns and that training
and thay perished in default thereof.





David

* "NEEDED" guns in the sense
of oxygen, water & food
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:05 am
@tsarstepan,
You know I find it sad that the anti-gun nuts are using the deaths of 20 children to promote their programs so shamefully.

It not the death of 20 children that is the issue as if those children had die in a school bus accident or by a tornado hitting the school or a fire or by any other means it would be short story over in a day or so at most.

If it was on a school bus there might had been a short discussion of how to improve school buses and the same for how to strenghten schools to better stand up to tornadoes.

Hell if the crazy SOB had used a can of gasoline and a road flare it would likely not be the never ending story either.

To sum up this event and deaths are being use to promote laws that likely will not stop one death by guns but will reduce the likelihood of anyone being in a position to defend themselves and others from such arm nuts.
JPB
 
  5  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:17 am
@BillRM,
This isn't intended as a reply to Bill's post but my "Reply All" tab has disappeared.

The connection between these types of shootings and the lack of mental health opportunities seems, to me, to be undeniable. This woman wrote a heart-wrenching blog about her son and her fear of her son for herself and for others.

http://anarchistsoccermom.blogspot.com/2012/12/thinking-unthinkable.html?m=1

Quote:
I live with a son who is mentally ill. I love my son. But he terrifies me.

A few weeks ago, Michael pulled a knife and threatened to kill me and then himself after I asked him to return his overdue library books. His 7 and 9 year old siblings knew the safety plan—they ran to the car and locked the doors before I even asked them to. I managed to get the knife from Michael, then methodically collected all the sharp objects in the house into a single Tupperware container that now travels with me. Through it all, he continued to scream insults at me and threaten to kill or hurt me.

That conflict ended with three burly police officers and a paramedic wrestling my son onto a gurney for an expensive ambulance ride to the local emergency room. The mental hospital didn’t have any beds that day, and Michael calmed down nicely in the ER, so they sent us home with a prescription for Zyprexa and a follow-up visit with a local pediatric psychiatrist.

We still don’t know what’s wrong with Michael. Autism spectrum, ADHD, Oppositional Defiant or Intermittent Explosive Disorder have all been tossed around at various meetings with probation officers and social workers and counselors and teachers and school administrators. He’s been on a slew of antipsychotic and mood altering pharmaceuticals, a Russian novel of behavioral plans. Nothing seems to work.

...

On the intake form, under the question, “What are your expectations for treatment?” I wrote, “I need help.”

And I do. This problem is too big for me to handle on my own. Sometimes there are no good options. So you just pray for grace and trust that in hindsight, it will all make sense.

I am sharing this story because I am Adam Lanza’s mother. I am Dylan Klebold’s and Eric Harris’s mother. I am Jason Holmes’s mother. I am Jared Loughner’s mother. I am Seung-Hui Cho’s mother. And these boys—and their mothers—need help. In the wake of another horrific national tragedy, it’s easy to talk about guns. But it’s time to talk about mental illness.

According to Mother Jones, since 1982, 61 mass murders involving firearms have occurred throughout the country. (http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map). Of these, 43 of the killers were white males, and only one was a woman. Mother Jones focused on whether the killers obtained their guns legally (most did). But this highly visible sign of mental illness should lead us to consider how many people in the U.S. live in fear, like I do.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:24 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

You know I find it sad that the anti-gun nuts are using the deaths of 20 children to promote their programs so shamefully.

It not the death of 20 children that is the issue as if those children had die in a school bus accident or by a tornado hitting the school or a fire or by any other means it would be short story over in a day or so at most. If it was on a school bus there might had been a short discussion of how to improve school buses and the same for how to strenghten schools to better stand up to tornadoes.

Hell if the crazy SOB had used a can of gasoline and a road flare it would likely not be the never ending story either.

To sum up this event and deaths are being use to promote laws that likely will not stop one death by guns but will reduce the likelihood of anyone being in a position to defend themselves and others from such arm nuts.
This event is an argument in favor of EVERY
potential future victim arming himself against the possibility of violence,
the same as we wear seatbelts. Perhaps for safety, gun control laws
shud REQUIRE adequate personal armament.

On second thawt: it shud remain voluntary.






David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  4  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:35 am
@boomerang,
The discussion also turns to better gun regulation because, given the magnitude of gun violence in our society, it's become a public health issue.
Quote:
Calling for gun control means we're happy to put a band aid on the problem without addressing the reasons that some young men are so angry that they do things like this

I'm not sure that anger is the main underlying force, since other emotional factors, and other motivations, might be involved. But the easy availability of guns, particularly high powered, rapid-firing weapons, is what helps to make this type of multiple death killing spree possible. Focusing on the most commonly used instruments of death, with an eye toward better regulation, is not to put a band-aid on the problem, it's an attempt to address a salient component of the problem.

Perhaps we should also look at the culture of violence we raise our children in--including movies that glorify violence and make it "exciting" and video games that teach them how to shoot and kill, and give them a feeling of power and victory in the process. If there is any "boy culture" that translates into adult gun violence, it is a culture that disproportionately affects the United States, suggesting that the easy availability of guns in our society, rather than simply the influence of testosterone, is a primary factor we must look at. The "freedom" to own guns has become twisted into a freedom to kill, at an alarming rate, with about 10,000 people a year killed by guns in this country. Should better gun safety, and better regulation of the means of acquisition, not be a legitimate subject for discussion?

"Gun control" isn't about taking away the guns people own for legitimate reasons of self-defense or recreational purposes, but it is about the sort of better regulations that you suggest. And it's also about questioning the easy availability of "guns" that are actually weapons of mass destruction and which make possible the sort of slaughter which are seeing with increasing frequency--and which caused the horrific carnage in that school, a massacre which took only about 2 minutes from beginning to end.
Quote:
December 15, 2012
Children Were All Shot Multiple Times With a Semiautomatic, Officials Say
By JAMES BARRON

The gunman in the Connecticut shooting blasted his way into the elementary school and then sprayed the children with bullets, first from a distance and then at close range, hitting some of them as many as 11 times, as he fired a semiautomatic rifle loaded with ammunition designed for maximum damage, officials said Saturday.

The state’s chief medical examiner, H. Wayne Carver II, said all of the 20 children and 6 adults gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., had been struck more than once in the fusillade.

He said their wounds were “all over, all over.”

“This is a very devastating set of injuries,” he said at a briefing in Newtown. When he was asked if they had suffered after they were hit, he said, “Not for very long.”...

. Carver said it appeared that all of the children had been killed by a “long rifle” that Mr. Lanza was carrying; a .223 Bushmaster semiautomatic rifle was one of the several weapons police found in the school. The other guns were semiautomatic pistols, including a .10 mm Glock and a .9 mm Sig Sauer.

The bullets Mr. Lanza used were “designed in such a fashion the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in,” resulting in deep damage, Dr. Carver said. As to how many bullets Mr. Lanza had fired, Dr. Carver said he did not have an exact count. “There were lots of them,” he said.

He said that parents had identified their children from photographs to spare them from seeing the gruesome results of the rampage. He said that 4 doctors and 10 technicians had done the autopsies and that he had personally performed seven, all on first-graders.

“This is probably the worst I have seen or the worst that I know of any of my colleagues having seen,” said Dr. Carver, who is 60 and has been Connecticut’s chief medical examiner since 1989...
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/16/nyregion/gunman-kills-20-children-at-school-in-connecticut-28-dead-in-all.html?hp


It's impossible to separate the type of "gun" used from the type of devastating, and lethal, damage inflicted, quite rapidly, on a large number of victims. We are talking about weapons of mass destruction.







Ceili
 
  3  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:39 am
@McGentrix,
Read between this post and yours, tell me this is how gun owners care about people, children more than guns?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:41 am
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

The discussion also turns to better gun regulation . . .
That is like discussing better opinion regulation;
the jurisdiction is the same for both.





David
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:43 am
@JPB,
We closed most in patient mental health treatments facillities when some fairly good drugs came along for those conditions.

The problem being that a large fraction of this population will not take those drugs on their own.

But on reading that story gun laws was not at the top of my concerns as in that situation knives or bare hands will do when there are young children in the home.

How dare this mother in the story allow a dangerous to her other children to be in her house and I do not care what she need to do to end this matter at once.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:48 am
@Ceili,
Ceili wrote:

Read between this post and yours, tell me this is how gun owners care about people,
children more than guns?
Because we care about them,
we want them well armed in their own defense.
The same principle as wearing seatbelts.





David
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:52 am
@firefly,
I don't disagree. I'm all for better regulations on guns. I just worry that the real issue gets buried under the gun control debate.

I don't think the general population needs automatic weapons, giant clips for ammo, thousands or rounds or ammo, bullet proof anything. If they should be able to buy it at all, they shouldn't be able to buy it on the internet, ever.

I don't think we can blame it on movies or games or music or anything. Other countries don't have this problem and they consume as much of this stuff as American boys do. Most of the young girls I know consume the same things and shooting up places doesn't seem to be a problem with them. But yes, the ease at which anyone can get their hands on a gun is a problem.

My experience with boy culture is that everything is one pill away from being right as rain. The school counselors/psychologist seem to primarily exist to tell parents to ask their doctor if Ritalin, et al, is right for them.

Childhood has become increasingly competitive -- you can only win if someone else is losing. We have a very narrow view of "success" and if you don't fit in there, you're told you'll never amount to anything.

Anything that resembles "character education" is derided as a waste of academic resources and/or a liberal agenda to turn our country into a bunch of socialist sissies.

Yes, access to guns and gun accessories are a problem. I just don't think they're THE problem.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:52 am
@firefly,
Quote:
It's impossible to separate the type of gun used from the type of devastating, and lethal, damage inflicted, quite rapidly, on a large number of victims.


There is a gun/rifle that is so old that some of them was manufacture well before 1898 and so in not legally even consider a firearm under federal law that could do the same thing.

Look up the level action Henry repeating rifle.

You do not need an assault rifle or a model semi-auto handgun to put one hell of a lot of rounds down range in a short period of time ie in seconds.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:53 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Because we care about them,
we want them well armed in their own defense...


David, get real.

Quote:
The gunman in the Connecticut shooting blasted his way into the elementary school and then sprayed the children with bullets, first from a distance and then at close range, hitting some of them as many as 11 times, as he fired a semiautomatic rifle loaded with ammunition designed for maximum damage, officials said Saturday.

0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 09:55 am
@boomerang,
Well said, boom.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  4  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 10:01 am
@BillRM,
Not taking the drugs isn't the only problem, Bill. Drugs aren't the only answer --- oftentimes the drugs don't work and the side-effects are horrendous. We closed most in-patient mental health treatment facilities and expected the jails to take over --- AFTER a tragedy.

This mother has no recourse other than jail for her young son.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 10:06 am
@JPB,
Quote:
This mother has no recourse other than jail for her young son.

There are residential treatment facilities available for emotionally disturbed children or those with severe behavioral problems.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 16 Dec, 2012 10:08 am
@OmSigDAVID,
The Connecticut medical examiner on Saturday released the names of the shooting victims from Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.

Charlotte Bacon, 6
2/22/06

Daniel Barden, 7
9/25/05

Rachel Davino, 29
07/17/83

Olivia Engel, 6
7/18/06

Josephine Gay, 7
12/11/05

Ana M. Marquez-Greene, 6
4/4/06

Dylan Hockley, 6
3/8/06

Dawn Hochsprung, 47
6/28/65

Madeleine F. Hsu, 6
7/10/06

Catherine V. Hubbard, 6
6/8/06

Chase Kowalski, 7
10/31/05

Jesse Lewis, 6
6/30/06

James Mattioli, 6
3/22/06

Grace McDonnell, 7
11/4/05

Anne Marie Murphy, 52
7/25/60

Emilie Parker, 6
5/12/06

Jack Pinto, 6
5/6/06

Noah Pozner, 6
11/20/06

Caroline Previdi, 6
9/7/06

Jessica Rekos, 6
5/10/06

Avielle Richman, 6
10/17/06

Lauren Rousseau, 30
6/82

Mary Sherlach, 56
02/11/56

Victoria Soto, 27
11/04/85

Benjamin Wheeler, 6
9/12/06

Allison N. Wyatt, 6
7/03/06
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/28/2024 at 02:51:41