64
   

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn

 
 
ossobuco
 
  2  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 02:52 pm
@parados,
As you probably know, my father was commanding officer at the bikini bomb tests (photography). His equal at the table was a submarine captain.
That man entered the jesuits not long after that.
My father and he were not stupid.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 02:54 pm
@firefly,
Ownership and registration is not one and the same thing and you can own a car and have it on your property and not have it register.

Registration if only needed to get it license to drive on the public roadways.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 02:56 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
When politicians can't grasp the nettle they are no longer leaders.


Politicians who are leaders tend to be unemployed politicians.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 02:58 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
They are between the rock and the hard place.
with lots of major problems on their plate, and washington no longer works.

Richard Cohen

Quote:
In 1962, Casey Stengel, the longtime manager of the New York Yankees, came out of retirement to lead the New York Mets, an expansion team. That season the Mets lost an astounding 120 games — which is within about 20 games of what Stengel used to win with the Yankees — and prompted him to ask a memorable question: “Can’t anybody here play this game?” That very question can now be asked about Washington
.
.
.

Obama and Boehner are co-pilots steering us toward the fiscal cliff. Their respective jobs are beyond them. One talks over the head of Congress, the other called for a vote he couldn’t win. The thing’s on automatic pilot — automatic spending cuts, automatic tax increases: automatic debacle. The stock market fell. Next, jobs will be lost. Boehner went home to Ohio, and the president went to Hawaii for a vacation . . . from what? Only the ghost of Casey Stengel remains in town: “Can’t anybody here play this game?”

Apparently not.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/richard-cohen-a-washington-in-need-of-assembly/2012/12/24/8d2352f0-4dfd-11e2-950a-7863a013264b_story.html?hpid=z2

these guys are going to deal with guns, an issue that splits the nation almost 50/50? no way. obama will make some more useless "big speeches" as is his style and congress might pass some useless law with "gun control" in the header so that all can proclaim taking action and that will be that. charades and lies are what we get from washington, not solutions or action.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 03:13 pm
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Well if you ask any Christian I think that they may tell you that America was founded on Christian values.


An they would be wrong by the words of congress as a matter of fact.

Quote:
Another example is the Treaty of Tripoli, negotiated by George Washington and signed by John Adams, which explicitly denies that the United States is a Christian nation. Specifically, Artical 11 which states;

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 03:15 pm
@Region Philbis,
Quote:
tighter gun control legislation might have prevented him from having a gun in the first place...


So you think that with 300 millions firearms he could not find someone to sell him a gun no matter what the laws happen to be?

Bet you think that it is hard to find and buy illegal street drugs because of the war on drug and the laws!!!!!!!!
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 03:24 pm
@firefly,
Another irresponsible gun owner--and attempted killer--this one is the son of the president of the NRA. This is the kind of dangerous person who shouldn't be able to get his hands on a gun.

Quote:
New NRA Prez David Keene's Son Is a Convicted Road-Rage Shooter
05/02/11

If all goes as expected in Pittsburgh today, American Conservative Union President David Keene will be elected president of the National Rifle Association at the organization's board of directors meeting.

One person who presumably will not be attending the event is Keene's son, David Michael Keene, who according to news reports and trial documents was convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison for a 2002 road-rage incident in which he fired a handgun from his moving vehicle at another car on the George Washington Memorial Parkway in Virginia.

For more on this, let's go to that pro-gun bastion of conservative reporting, WorldNetDaily. In a December 2010 article which focused primarily on a rumored $400,000 embezzlement scandal facing the American Conservative Union, WorldNetDaily reported that:

In addition to his role at ACU, David Keene also serves as 1st vice president of the National Rifle Association and, as such, is in line to become the powerful gun lobby's next president.

That role caused the NRA some anguish when Keene's son, David Michael Keene, was arrested for a road rage incident in which he allegedly fired a gun at another motorist on the George Washington Memorial Parkway. The round fired shattered the rear window of the victim's car, lodging into the driver's seat, coming within inches of hitting him, according to police reports.


Remember, guns don't attempt to kill people, the sons of NRA presidents do.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-sugarmann/new-nra-prez-david-keenes_b_856268.html


Will having more guns in circulation protect people from crazy road rage shooters, like the president of the NRA's son? Or will it just put more of them in hands like that?

David Michael Keene's NRA Prez dad really taught him responsible gun use, didn't he?

0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:34 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Yes, they can certainly pass unconstitutional laws. But doing so will not ultimately achieve anything.


It will. It passes the buck to the judiciary. Congress bans assault weapons. Judges strike it down. Next massacre Congress says "it's not our fault folks".


There is the small fact that banning assault weapons would not do a thing to prevent or minimize any massacres.

The only reason some people want to ban them is because those people hate the Constitution and want to violate other people's civil rights.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:35 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
oralloy wrote:
All the Republicans want to do is have measures in place to prevent people from cheating.


Sorry that is not even the words of some of the GOP politicians who got those attempts on the law books.

Once more when you are talking about raising barriers for hundreds of thousands of valid voters to vote and using the excuse that someone might be cheating even when you can not point to one case of that happening in the past there is little question what the hell is going on.


All the Republicans are doing is requiring a photo ID in order to vote. That is a perfectly reasonable barrier to raise.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:35 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
I see that Rex is confused again....one needs insurance to drive a car off your property, not to own a car.


Good catch. I totally missed that.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:36 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:
I think you're the one who is confused. To legally own a car, which means to take title to it, you have to register it, and you can't do that without insurance.


Nope. None of those things are required in order to legally own a car.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:40 pm
@oralloy,
insurance is only required to drive said car on public roads....a law which is often not followed or compelled by the state which is why all non idiots get uninsured motorist insurance.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:46 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
Something has already changed. The talk of banning assault weapons has led to many thousands of extra assault weapons going into circulation and if the talk was just talk the talkers have sold the weapons and lined the coffers of the arms industry so that it can afford more lobbying and other sweeteners. And the polarisation is more extreme.

And the talkers should have known really.

The only way out for them is to deliver. And if they don't want to fight they shouldn't have opened their gobs in the first place in order to court cheap popularity and display their compassion for our admiration.


They will not be delivering any unconstitutional ban on assault weapons. If that is a problem for them, then they shouldn't have set out to violate the Constitution.

They may or may not deliver a ban on large magazines, or a requirement for background checks on all sales at gun shows. That remains to be seen.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:47 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
insurance is only required to drive said car on public roads....a law which is often not followed or compelled by the state which is why all non idiots get uninsured motorist insurance.


I know. I was half asleep when I answered his post this morning.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 04:49 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
They may or may not deliver a ban on large magazines
easy to make and to hide, right? this would be useless, would only move the trade to the black market.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 05:02 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
oralloy wrote:
They may or may not deliver a ban on large magazines


easy to make and to hide, right? this would be useless, would only move the trade to the black market.


Probably more the grey market. Assuming that they grandfather existing magazines, all anyone would ever have to do is proclaim that all their magazines were pre-ban.

They might be able to catch someone manufacturing them, but overall, that effort would probably be about as successful as Prohibition was.



I'm also expecting a big step up in firepower. For those who stick to 10 rounds, who is going to choose "10 rounds of .223" over "10 rounds of .308"?

Even if someone doesn't like the recoil, necking the .308 down to 7mm or 6.5mm will be far preferable to having the same number of .223 rounds:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.260_Remington
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7mm-08_Remington
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 05:08 pm
@raprap,
raprap the retard wrote:
Bill, you know you shouldn't try to confuse the Oraboy with facts--his mind is already made up and he is better than we are.


Feel free to try to show any fact that I'm wrong about.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 05:11 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Probably more the grey market. Assuming that they grandfather existing magazines, all anyone would ever have to do is proclaim that all their magazines were pre-ban
are they numbered? they are easy to make correct....any machine shop could do with and any machine shop worker could do it?
BillRM
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 05:25 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
All the Republicans are doing is requiring a photo ID in order to vote. That is a perfectly reasonable barrier to raise.


Sorry when you have hundreds of thousands of valid repeat valid voters in a state without photo IDs and the state can not show one repeat one case of in person voter fraud in the last ten years or so in the same state it is not a reasonable requirement.
oralloy
 
  0  
Tue 25 Dec, 2012 05:28 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
oralloy wrote:
Probably more the grey market. Assuming that they grandfather existing magazines, all anyone would ever have to do is proclaim that all their magazines were pre-ban


are they numbered?


That probably depends on the manufacturer. I'm not aware of any legal requirement that they be numbered.



hawkeye10 wrote:
they are easy to make correct....any machine shop could do with and any machine shop worker could do it?


I believe so. (But haven't really thought about it, so there could be a catch I am unaware of.)

I'm sure a machine shop would have no trouble making them.

And then as soon as they left the shop, people could just pretend they were pre-ban.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 06:43:27