@firefly,
Quote:All these nutty ideas, about a woman's alleged biological ability to keep sperm from fertilizing her egg, if she really doesn't want to get pregnant, that both Akin and spendius have voiced, really astound me. I'm flabberghasted that there are adult men who actually believe these things.
And what does it prove that you think they are nutty ideas and are astounded and flabbergasted by them?
I'll tell you what it proves ff. It proves your inexperience.
What do you think "lie back and think of England" means?
There are four separate mechanisms the female body has to prevent pregnancy in a general sense. Three of them are available to a conscious rape victim. None to an unconscious one. A sperm that makes it past these defences is a very vigorous one. Which one might expect evolution to have built in to a vigorous species.
They are reflexes if the female is a full and eager participant by which I mean they kick in without being thought about.
The reason they are not well known is because of reliance on artificial methods of birth control. All artificial safety devices are anti-evolutionary. They allow people to do things they shouldn't be doing. Like using sex for materialistic ends when not an eager participant. Which women can do and men can't. Faking being eager is cheating.
And your remark "if she really doesn't want to get pregnant" gives you away. She has no choice if she's an eager participant. They are reflexes. It just happens that way. A randy woman is not thinking at all. She's not calculating what she wants. She's rooting.
As I have said, you are taking advantage of people like Mr Akin being too polite to give it out straight. You are relying on euphemisms. If you push too hard somebody will give it you straight and you will be mortified.
You're a spokesperson for male chauvinists ff. Easing their burdens.
