@firefly,
Quote:He was implying, as you are, that a woman's word about whether she has been raped is suspect
Which it often is. Hence a jury trial.
Quote:with the clear implication that many women who claim to have been raped were not
Which is often the case.
Quote:that their claims are not "legitimate rapes".
It happens often enough.
Quote: And, not only is that view highly offensive to rape victims
Why should it be? It is those who assert rape when rape has not occurred who should be highly offensive to real rape victims. If so many women didn't make false accusations we would be readier to believe the victims of real rape.
Quote:, it is extremely insulting to all women.
It is not. It is you who are insulting women in order to be indignant and be talking about sex respectably.
An old fashioned Matron will recommend regular exercise to prevent pregnancy. And I don't mean running around the block. The vaginal muscles can prevent a male ejaculation, even expel the penis or expel the semen. What would you say is the evolutionary function of those muscles?
None of which is an excuse for genuine rape.
I think Mr Akin was correct just as Mr Clinton was. But both found their correct statements politically unacceptable.
The sure way is the veil in public places, no unaccompanied wandering around and seclusion. Those who object to that encourage rape as Setanta implied on the first page.