24
   

Arizona does it again!!! (Is this legal?)

 
 
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 11:30 am
@BillRM,
Also as in the case of Miss. there is a catch 22 in place, you can't get a voter ID without a drive liscense or copy of birth certificate and you can't get a birth certificate without a valid ID.

Quote:
The law, signed by Gov. Phil Bryant (R) earlier this year but still pending federal approval, includes a measure allowing Mississipians to get free voter ID cards if they present a birth certificate. But Mississippi law also requires its residents to show valid photo identification in order to get a copy of their birth certificate. Most applicants for voter ID cards are presumed to be seeking them because they don't have another acceptable form of photo ID. In other words, no birth certificate, no voter ID -- but also no photo ID, no birth certificate.


source

In Pennsylvania More than 758,000 registered voters do not have photo identification cards. In Philadelphia, where 186,830 registered voters - 18 percent of the city's total registration - do not have PennDot ID. That is an awful lot of people having to go through hoops to get some form of voter ID if they don't have the alternative forms of ID such as: U.S. passports, student identification cards with expiration dates, current military identification, and ID cards issued to government employees.

Voter ID law may affect more Pennsylvanians than previously estimated
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 11:31 am
@revelette,
They can usually get a certified copy of their birth certificate from the place where they were born for a fee.

In California, it costs $18.
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 11:43 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
A federal judge sided with the Obama campaign and ruled Friday to order Ohio to restore three days of early voting before Election Day, a decision that could affect the outcome of the 2012 election in a key battleground state.

Judge Peter C. Economus of the Southern District Court of Ohio granted an injunction in favor of Obama For America, the Democratic National Committee and the Ohio Democratic Party, which sued Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted to restore in-person voting in the last weekend before the election.

"On balance, the right of Ohio voters to vote in person during the last three days prior to Election Day -- a right previously conferred to all voters by the State -- outweighs the State's interest in setting the 6 p.m. Friday deadline," ruled the court. "The burden on Ohio voters' right to participate in the national and statewide election is great, as evidenced by the statistical analysis offered by Plaintiffs and not disputed by Defendants. Moreover, the State fails to articulate a precise, compelling interest in establishing the 6 p.m. Friday deadline as applied to non-UOCAVA [Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act] voters and has failed to evidence any commitment to the 'exception' it rhetorically extended to UOCAVA voters."


source
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 02:38 pm
I cant believe that anyone with 2 brain cells can believe that this is anything but a conservative motivated attempt to keep poor and blacks from voting democrat.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 03:10 pm
@RABEL222,
What brain cells? Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 05:16 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Oh, you remember.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 08:25 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
I cant believe that anyone with 2 brain cells can believe that this is
anything but a conservative motivated attempt to keep poor and blacks from voting democrat.
FRAUDULENTLY, yes!

It is HUMOROUS to see all this Democrat howling & whining!
JTT
 
  2  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 08:29 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
It is HUMOROUS to see all this Democrat howling & whining!


Says the arch conservative who purports to be a libertarian. A libertarian who would, in other situations, be apoplectic about government attempts to take away a citizen's right to vote.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Aug, 2012 08:42 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Who's howling and whining? Show us?

What most of us saw at the republican convention are most of their leadership telling the whole world about their families, then lying about Obama and what they will do while the attendees howled and clapped..

Do some FactChecks on both Ryan and Romney's speeches.
Even the many articles about Clint Eastwood. LOL

Maybe your brain can retain some of it.

Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Sep, 2012 09:32 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Do some FactChecks on both Ryan and Romney's speeches.
Even the many articles about Clint Eastwood. LOL


I'll say one thing for ol' Clint. He, at least, seems to have a sense of humor, compared to the run-of-the-mill pols running for high office.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 08:26 am
@Lustig Andrei,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Do some FactChecks on both Ryan and Romney's speeches.
Even the many articles about Clint Eastwood. LOL
Lustig Andrei wrote:
I'll say one thing for ol' Clint. He, at least, seems to have a sense of humor,
compared to the run-of-the-mill pols running for high office.
U laff at him because he lost his mind to age, in public.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 08:35 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Too bad Clint didn't know any better, or the people who put him on national tv to make a fool of himself.
Talking to an empty chair and getting angry at Obama was silly, because what he was saying wasn't based on any truth.

When the other party became the "No Party," you can't blame the president for not accomplishing more than he did.

That's beyond stupid!
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 08:38 am
@cicerone imposter,
I 'll accept your expertise on stupidity; (also on ignorance).
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 10:35 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Your post certainly proved CI correct.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Sep, 2012 10:07 pm
@RABEL222,
True; first he says Clint lost his mind on tv, then tries to defend the man. David doesn't understand simple logic.

That definitely puts him in the stupid class.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/01/2021 at 11:56:23