13
   

Women's rights being eroded by republicans

 
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -3  
Sun 2 Feb, 2014 03:49 pm
Hey girls, arm yourselves with these full metal-jacketted bible rounds-
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28 )

"In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams. On my servants, both men and women, I will pour out my Spirit in those days, and they will speak." (Joel 2:28-32)

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/chr-wom3_zps84bd548a.jpg~original
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Sun 9 Mar, 2014 10:00 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1/s720x720/1920151_399054596898833_854912426_n.png
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Sun 9 Mar, 2014 11:56 pm
American politics are not my strong point, and i've lost the thread of this thread, but if its about a womans right to abort a baby simply as a form of contraception, surely that's not a good thing to do?
panzade
 
  3  
Mon 10 Mar, 2014 02:38 am
http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r147/panzade/dickvagina_zps25b87ed7.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Mon 10 Mar, 2014 02:19 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:

American politics are not my strong point, and i've lost the thread of this thread, but if its about a womans right to abort a baby simply as a form of contraception, surely that's not a good thing to do?


It is not about if abortion is a good or bad thing to do. It is about a woman's choice to decide for herself the ethical implications. It is not an issue that should be decided and mandated by male fascist bureaucrats and religious nuts.
panzade
 
  1  
Tue 11 Mar, 2014 10:58 am
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/t1/1890978_732934956728372_663362013_n.jpg
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Tue 11 Mar, 2014 11:04 am
@panzade,
Only iff you think the sum total of a womans voting issues rests with Abortion.
panzade
 
  1  
Tue 11 Mar, 2014 11:09 am
@Baldimo,
I don't.
There are many ways the GOP is hobbling women's attempts to achieve parity
Baldimo.
Down in Texas Abbott vs Davis is highlighting some.
https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1/1013868_10153932616045094_895299295_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  2  
Tue 11 Mar, 2014 11:14 am
Quote:
President Barack Obama received a loud applause in his State of the Union address when he spoke up in support of pay equity. McMorris Rodgers admits that by opposing Democratic plans to address the inequity for women without putting out their own plan, the GOP faces turning off women.

"Republicans need to recognize that, to be part of solution, in general bringing these work place laws into 21st century," McMorris Rodgers said.

Ellmers agreed, adding that "women across this country believe there's a discrepancy in equal pay for women so this is something we have to be fighting for."


61% of women over 50 think the GOP is unsupportive of women.
This could be a matter of tone in the message but it's a real problem for the GOP, Baldimo.

0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  2  
Wed 12 Mar, 2014 03:24 pm
Quote:
At CPAC over the weekend, Republican strategist Kate Obenshain offered her party some reasonable advice about addressing the gender gap between the major parties.

“We cannot have any stupid comments this year. No stupid comments,” she said. “Please think before you make pithy, obnoxious comments.”


But alas!

Quote:

New Hampshire state Rep. Kyle Tasker (R) went on a public Facebook forum Monday and posted a sexually explicit joke about women who have been the victims of domestic abuse.



The discussion on the Facebook page of the Greater Nashua Tea Party arose over the New Hampshire GOP’s refusal to stand by another state lawmaker, Rep. Mark Warden (R), who has come under scrutiny in recent days for saying, “Some people could make the argument that a lot of people like being in abusive relationships.”

Tasker defended Warden, and as the online discussion continued, he proceeded to publish a sexually explicit graphic with a joke about “battered women.” I’m not comfortable republishing his message here, but the GOP state lawmaker was apparently trying to make a joke about abusive victims and oral sex.


I'm not posting the posting. It's really tasteless.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Thu 13 Mar, 2014 12:51 pm
@RexRed,
Speaking of male fascist bureaucrats...

Republican state lawmaker jokes about “battered women”: “I still eat mine plain”
http://www.salon.com/2014/03/12/republican_state_lawmaker_jokes_about_battered_women_i_still_eat_mine_plain/

Typical republican these days... VOTE 'EM OUT!
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Tue 25 Mar, 2014 12:29 pm
https://scontent-a-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/1891297_837760979584449_1127975860_n.jpg
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Tue 25 Mar, 2014 12:42 pm
@panzade,
This is what happens when the govt forces us to carry things we don't always need.
RexRed
 
  0  
Sat 29 Mar, 2014 02:32 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

This is what happens when the govt forces us to carry things we don't always need.


No we don't ALWAYS need health care but all will eventually need heath care and this is called "insurance".

Or are you saying healthcare should be free for all and no fee attached? Sounds like socialism to me...

In capitalism people pay for services and yes, THAT is mandated.

0 Replies
 
bairjohn
 
  -2  
Thu 26 May, 2022 07:27 pm
@RexRed,
I have a question, I'm a independent by the way, and honestly I don't care what people do as long as it doesn't cost or concern me. With that said, my question is women talk a lot about choice, what choices do men have? If a women gets pregnant the man really has no choice whether she aborts or not, yet if the woman can prove it's his child she can still sue, and in 99.9% of the cases force him to support. Even rape cases that involved pregnancy men had been liable for support (I agree with that). As long as my tax dollars are not associated with the costs even with the Hyde Amendment restrictions, there are many factors in government funding birth control. Why should I or any other taxpayer pay for others to have sex?
glitterbag
 
  2  
Thu 26 May, 2022 09:30 pm
@bairjohn,
Why don't you get back to me after you get pregnant, then we will talk.
0 Replies
 
bulmabriefs144
 
  -2  
Thu 26 May, 2022 10:03 pm
@RexRed,
You don't really understand what women's rights really are. That is why you are willingly getting rid of them.
1. Women got the right to vote and the right to work if they want, and the right to inherit. This took many generations to get me to understand common sense rights.
2. They got the right to divorce a man, with or without his signature. And the right to remarry with or without his permission.
3. When got the right to be manly if they want. To marry men or women. These are rights.

Fun fact: Trump did not attack marriage equality. He did however attack abortion. And so do I. Why? Because abortion is not a right. It is the antithesis of a right, in fact. It mistreats another person so someone else has the "right" to be irresponsible.

1. Abortion is a "right" that gives men permission to have sex with a woman, and then ignore all responsibility. It gaslights them into thinking that it's their choice, when often it's the philandering manchild who uses them as a **** toy before playing with someone else.
https://preview.redd.it/pf57l1p40zk81.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=8750123ccc0fd82c3d7561d93293b9b087b54992
1b. Further, the birth control pills that women use to pretend they can work without becoming completely incapacitated once they become pregnant screw with their entire system, changing their physical attraction from manly men (Hugh Jackman) to more effeminate men (Justin Bieber) to outright trans overlap. In extreme cases, this means that women who would otherwise like to become pregnant miss their window. They want a career and family, but get sucked into only getting career.
1c. Oh btw? Birth control pills cause brain cancer. There are far safer methods of birth prevention.
2. Far from allowing women to work, there is now an expectation to work. This is just replacing one demand with another, and shaming women when they want a family as "regressive."
2b. Further. Some women are expected to work and also be housekeeper. This is unreasonable, and creates tension in a marriage where the person they thought they married now has expectations for them to be stereotypically feminine from before feminism, yet also somehow take on this new burden.
2c. This in turn creates distorted expectations which directly cause divorce.
3. When we're talking about the health issue, why exactly is it that the price of a pregnancy have inflated to such a degree that most women cannot afford to have a child in a hospital. They can risk it themselves or have a midwife, who hasn't the professional training. The cost is more than a luxury car nowadays, especially in woke states like California. They are pricing childbirth out as an option, and incentivizing abortion. This is a gross betrayal of women, and not only that, the rhetoric is "pro-choice" but when an abortion is $750 or so, and carrying to term is over $9000, that's hardly a choice. All of this kept high from the ready-made push by government to abort.

In short? **** your "rights."

You've thrown away your real rights to slaveowners to make you a wage slave, and rapists to have sex with you and not be forced to marry you. If woman can refuse a suitor, that's a right. If a woman can have a violent traumatic night, and then get coerced into killing a child that has nothing to do with that, they have basically been brainwashed.



Yes, men don't say this out loud in real life. But it reflects this exact ethos in their general behavior.



0 Replies
 
bulmabriefs144
 
  -2  
Thu 26 May, 2022 10:23 pm
@bairjohn,
The video I posted was a parody, but apparently not that much of a parody.

The exact reason why men pressure women has alot to do with shirking child care costs. It's a cold economic decision.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/06/why-are-so-many-men-desperate-to-kill-babies-and-traumatize-women/
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/23/cnns-dana-bashs-solution-to-child-poverty-kill-the-babies/
bulmabriefs144
 
  -2  
Fri 27 May, 2022 12:53 am
@bulmabriefs144,
Lastly, personhood is a nice way of saying that a woman has lost her womanhood.

It used to be that women were seductive. I watched a film about Colette. Into men and women, had nearly the sex drive of her husband (at one point, both were attracted to the same prostitute), very successful at her career as a writer, had a second career as an actress. She was all woman, despite sometimes wearing trousers.
https://smoda.elpais.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/colette-getty-635x953.jpg

The "persons" that women are today are immature and entitled, without an adult understanding of real sexiness.
https://media.vocativ.com/photos/2014/05/Chloe-Aftel-Agender-03-1024x682.jpg
They're often fat, lazy, and feel like they are a whole person when they're really quite broken. I could compare this to how a wolf is the full realization of what a canine is, while dogs are domesticated and tame, stunted halfway through their development to look cute. The persons today don't have that emotionality that makes a women wild and unpredictable.

When a woman talks about personhood, I can tell she's a little puppy that has had the womanhood bred out of her. That's cute. Bur I prefer women with actual intensity.
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/c8/ea/16/c8ea16b5de6f05ecef583918f7ddc84a.jpg

This woman has intensity too. She's a grown ass woman, not a "person" puppy.
https://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/chr-wom3_zps84bd548a.jpg~original
roger
 
  1  
Fri 27 May, 2022 01:50 am
@bulmabriefs144,
Interesting thoughts.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 03:27:44