Not to mention all the media hoopla. How are kids perceiving that?
I'm expecting at least one of my friend's kids to tell me that this was "stoooooooopid, it's just a boob".
I'm still grateful for this - it turned me on to a new aspect of piercing I'd never been aware of - the nipple shield.
I think that Justin did not know if he tore it would come off the way they did. I do believe that they did practice something similar except he thought that only a piece of it would come off leaving the red half behind. Janet knew what it would do and it is apparent because her CD was to drop and her single. It was all for her.
Even the guy who designed the costume said that is exactly how she wanted it to go because that is how he made it. She wanted to show some skin.
ehBeth wrote:I'm still grateful for this - it turned me on to a new aspect of piercing I'd never been aware of - the nipple shield.
Oh my goodness ehBeth!! The visuals! Noooooo!!!!
*LOL*
BlueMonkey wrote:I think that Justin did not know if he tore it would come off the way they did. I do believe that they did practice something similar except he thought that only a piece of it would come off leaving the red half behind. Janet knew what it would do and it is apparent because her CD was to drop and her single. It was all for her.
Even the guy who designed the costume said that is exactly how she wanted it to go because that is how he made it. She wanted to show some skin.
Well maybe Justin is a rube in all this, but just the idea of tearing away a piece of woman's clothing is tasteless. He's, at the very least, guilty of that much.
hmmmmmm
is every too young to remember apache dancers? this is all pretty tame in comparison.
Apache dancers? <she asks, with not a little trepidation...>
So, listen, when do we have the apache dancers commercial for, ummmm. what.... a bullet train between Guadalajara and Denver...
Transcript from every conversation today:
bla blah blah Janet Jackson's boob blah blah blah, Nipple? Oh my God! blah blah blah Justin Timberlake blah blah blah what a moron blah blah blah "wardrobe malfunction" blah blah blah her right tit blah blah blah . . .
So, listen, what about that catch?
ehBeth wrote:be afraid
be very afraid
I am! *trying to blot out the visuals*
apache dancers? I dunno if it's that I'm "too young" 'cause as my Dad so pleasantly told me a few years back "you're no spring chicken anymore" (gee thanks Dad!)....but I was never one to be "in the loop"...so clue me in to the apache dancers thing please!
Mrs. cav is up to her old conspiracy theories again, but I thought this one merited a mention. On Monday, while the world was in a hoopla over Janet Jackson's breast, THIS went practically unnoticed:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/doc_o_day/doc_o_day.html
Kinda makes you go "hmmm..."
Quote:Legal paperwork located inside top drawer, located in master bathroom/den.
I don't know which I find more odd. That legal paperwork would be kept inside a bathroom or the fact the police can't tell the difference between a bathroom and a den.
What on earth IS it with this breast!!!!?????
That is a nasty little site, Cav. I can't believe they publish the results of search warrants...
CBS, fearful of losin' the farm, will employ a 7-second delay on sunday night's grammy's.
the NFL has told MTV to take a hike; someone else will be in charge of next year's halftime x-travaganza.
Hold it. Why is Justin 'innocent'? Because he backed off of it on Monday like a punk and LIED about a 'wardrobe malfunction'? It was HIS song. The last line he sang right before the breast bearing bit was something about 'ripping off your clothes.' Rube my ass. Janet didn't rehearse it by herself.
The last line of the song is "Bet I'll have you naked by the end of this song."
Despite the lyric, I don't think anyone intended Janet's breast to be exposed. I think it was under-rehearsed and that Justin grabbed her costume in the wrong place and pulled off more than he intended to.
ehBeth, I'm too young to remember Apache dancers, but I know what they are. :wink:
