Janet Jackson breast exposed during halftime show

Saggy? Unattractive? It isn't THAT saggy. You only get "pert" breasts at a very young age, after that gravity plays a role. Oh yes, and pert with the fake boobs too. Why is is unattractive??

Do all men expect breasts to be full and pert to be attractive? Sheesh!

Bill O'Reilly sounds like a nut job. Not that it should surprise me. Why on earth should this be involved with the presidential campaign? That makes no sense to me. I wonder when FOX is going to wise up and see him for the @ss that he is. Ooops, I forgot...for some it's entertaining. THAT's why FOX keeps him around. Ironic, isn't it? If the USA was the type of country O'Reilly spouts off that he thinks it should be, he wouldn't even be on the air. What a windbag.

Someone is threatening to sue over this? *shakes head* Only in the land of litigation this would happen. (i.e. land of litigation = U.S.A.) Talk about a money grab! It's been my observation that young children take the lead of their parents...if it isn't a big deal to their parents, they don't get overly excited over it. How old are these kids? What exactly is her suit over? How are her kids harmed by this? I can see that lawsuit getting tossed out the window. Geez...talk about an overreaction. That woman needs to get a clue.

I saw a breast once . . .



. . . made me want to rape and kill . . .

3 canajuns complained to the CBC - out of what, 30,000,000+ ?
10 complained about a beer ad.
we're different here.
we've got our priorities straight.

Actually, I heard that the woman has decided not to sue over it. I don't know any more detail than that though. Maybe they paid her off.

kickycan, am i always reading yesterday's paper?
details, i want details!

Wanna bet she was Republican............

actually, i have heard a bit more. apparently, she said she would hold her lawsuit, until she was sure the government was handling this properly - or some such silliness.

Yeap, Republican

Jackson Suit Dropped

Woman had sought billions for Super Bowl flash

A Tennessee woman has dropped her class action lawsuit against Janet Jackson, Justin Timberlake, MTV, CBS and their parent company, Viacom, just one week after filing it in response to the now infamous Super Bowl halftime breast flash.

Knoxville native Terri Carlin filed a proposed class action lawsuit in a U.S. District Court last Wednesday, charging the accused with causing her and "millions of others" to "suffer outrage, anger, embarrassment and serious injury." The suit sought billions of dollars damages. According to Carlin's dismissal paperwork, she plans to wait and see if outrage over the incident will prompt new measures to prevent "indecent" material from airing on primetime television again.

Some changes have already been established. CBS, having been burned at the Super Bowl, ran a five-minute tape delay last Sunday for its coverage of the Grammy Awards. ABC is planning a five-second delay during its February 29th Academy Awards telecast. The Federal Communications Commission is also investigating the incident, having fielded almost as many complaints in the time since the flash as it did in all of 2003. Congress is also discussing more stringent rules, regulations and fines for networks that air "indecent" material at certain hours.

Source

See, see there . . . all you wimmins . . .


Them breasteses of yourn is indecent . . .

That moron and all the idiots like her are wasting our tax dollars. Can we sue her for being a greedy self-righteous bitch?

No, but they make up the so called 'accepted community standards' population that the FCC uses as a bench mark for such. Or something like that.

I don't think so - it is what the administration wants to do. It's called politicising an issue.

This can be base postive/centrist effective; therefore, help from many sides - so they decide to blow it out of proportion!

I doubt it if even 33% of Americans even give a ****......

I think that 33% of Americans probably do give a ****. I mean, once they are told that this is the **** that they should give a **** about . . . sheep!

How does the question go - Did you have sex with that girl.......................................

If you say the tit thing was kinda cute, then you must be a pervert - right

I have "suffered outrage" and "anger" over this ridiculous lawsuit, not to mention "embarrassment" for this woman. Think I have a case against her?

Just what was the serious injury? Did she trip over her feet dashing for the remote control to change the t.v. channel? I don't get it.

Bet that isn't what you tell certain wimmins.

I don't get it either...some people will find any reason to sue, as long as they know there's money in it for them.