1
   

Janet Jackson breast exposed during halftime show

 
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:08 am
Just another disgusting example of the moral decay of our society . . . if Dog had wanted us to be naked, we'd have been born that way . . . uhmmm . . . just a minute . . .


Good Lord, what rot. That old "society goin' to hell through moral decay" song has been sung by every generation in recorded history, and very likely for thousands of years before that. What a self-serving load of crap. Allow me to rephrase the standard christian rant on this topic:

I'm sexually repressed, afraid of the topic, and derive great comfort from my preacher telling me sex is a bad thing. I have a poor self-image, and therefore feel a great sense of relief when religiously minded people share with me their sense that the human body is ugly. What ? ! ? ! ? Millions of others disagree with me ? ! ? ! ? Sure sign of moral decay, because if we were a moral people, all of us would fear sex and be ashamed of our bodies.

Give me a break, will ya?
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:21 am
don't forget as their preaching about how sex is a bad thing they are abusing children, commiting adultery, attending peepshows...etc...OMG could they be hypocrites...nah, just human..with delusions of grandeur that THEY know what God thinks...lol
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:25 am
viacom, which owns CBS, could be digging deep into its wallet -- if the FCC has its way.
the network's more than 200 affiliates and company-owned stations could be fined $27,500 apiece.
http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/02/02/superbowl.jackson/index.html

5.5mill for one little peak-a-boob Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:29 am
moral degradation that's one of those hot buttons! Laughing
0 Replies
 
kjvtrue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:35 am
kickycan wrote:
kjvtrue

Thank God most Christians don't really care. It's just a boob, and even if it isn't, you are living in a fantasy world if you think you can change things with that kooky righteous indignation thing you got going there.
What Christian's don't care? Do you have proof?
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 11:46 am
kjvtrue wrote:
sozobe wrote:
And who's complaining?

Chortling at the naked machinations going on, but not complaining. If my 3-year-old had seen the boob, I wouldn't mind in the least. She likes boobs. The New Yorker and such often has nudity, she approves. ("A boobsie!") (The playacting of violently ripping off the clothes apparently against Janet's wishes part might have bothered me, but not the naked boob qua naked boob.)


Are you trying to mold your 3 yearold into a Lesbeian?


What in the hell kind of a remark is that?
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:00 pm
I'm not certain how much of kjvtrue is real and how much of this is just to bait people. On another thread kjvtrue was nearly dancing in the streets because the Patriots had won the superbowl.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:03 pm
A funny one, Montana. Wink I laughed myself silly. (Isn't raising a nice lesbian every mother's dream?)
0 Replies
 
willow tl
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:06 pm
One can only hope sozobe! :-)
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:33 pm
That boob didn't do the Jackson's justice. It didn't look fake, or perky, it just looked like a middle aged woman's boob.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:47 pm
hairy also
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:50 pm
can u get that kinda detail with HDTV?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 12:58 pm
I have HD, it was pretty much in focus.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 01:31 pm
the bottom picture grosses me out
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 01:39 pm
Lil Kim must be furious.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 02:02 pm
hairy?
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 02:09 pm
harried.
that's why it was only there for a second.
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 02:10 pm
I don't know about the rest of you, but I've chosen to ignore (i.e. not read) kjvtrue's posts after I read the "lesbian" comment. So that big long diatribe she launched into went blissfully unread by me. You all should try it. It's amazing how calm one feels ignoring blatantly inflammatory commentary. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 02:14 pm


What is there to be grossed out about? *confused*

You can see on the close up that the sun thing is obviously part of a nipple piercing. You can see the piece that goes through the nipple itself. You can also see that there are the bottom half of the metal snaps on her outfit that would allow that part of her garment to be removed. (i.e. the part that covers the breast) Know what I mean?
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Feb, 2004 02:16 pm
I think the idea of nipple piercing bothers some people, caprice... I find it rather interesting myself.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Take it All - Discussion by McGentrix
Cancelled - Discussion by Brandon9000
John Stewart meets Bill O'Reilly - Discussion by Thomas
BEFORE WE HAD T.V. - Discussion by edgarblythe
What TV shows do you watch? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Orange is the New Black - Discussion by tsarstepan
Odd Premier: Under the Dome - Discussion by edgarblythe
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"? - Discussion by firefly
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/09/2025 at 01:23:16