@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:Photographing an act of abuse continues that abuse,
I challenge your logic on that point, Izzy.
Returning to my example of the instance of my having been in
the hospital for abdominal surgery in 2005, when I was in my
assigned bedroom with a nurse I saw a brite flash of light
from behind me. Turning, I saw some guy wearing a white lab coat
with a camera, who had apparently taken a picture of my rear end,
exposed thru the back of my hospital gown. I deemed it foolish & stupid
to
DO that, but I was not moven to anger nor to resentment.
From my knowledge of the subject matter, I know that he got a very
ugly picture; really gross. I was so weak from being on I.V. with no food
(lost 50 pounds) that I coud hardly walk, but I was not moven
to strike him with my fist, if I had the strength. I did not complain.
I let it go. I have no emotions of getting "abused".
I felt much more "abused" concerning the hospital food
than over that fotografic misadventure. I can chuckle
over the odd foibles of the human mind.
I woud not wanna shake his hand, but I bear him no ill will.
If he had shown the picture to his friends, I don't care.
That act woud only show the state of ill health
into which his mind had fallen,
but it woud leave me
1OO% un-affected.
If u believe that I
WAS affected by that fotografy, Izzy,
then I will be
very interested in reading your explanaion of
HOW.
izzythepush wrote:the abuser knows images of themselves are being accessed by perverts.
This, to me, has absolute
O interest.
I coud not possibly care less than I do
about whether this is happening or not.
I 'm pretty sure that Jackie Onassis
knew that nude pictures of her on a Greek island
were in "Screw Magazine" maybe elsewhere.
She did not say much about it, so far as I know.
Maybe she did not have great, emotional superstitions
about the human body and the imperative need of secrecy.
I don 't. Do u ?
izzythepush wrote:There is also the profit motive,
images of abuse can be traded quite lucratively.
Your reasoning is that I 'm not getting my fair share of the revenue?
Truely, the only time that I have thawt about the incident
is in discussions of censorship of criminal censorship by
USURPATION
of forbidden political power. Regarding finances, there may be
the possibility of civil redress.
izzythepush wrote:As for Dillinger, people aren't going to get off on pictures of bank robbers,
His robberies were
exciting,
with his submachineguns and Babyface Nelson's sweet (cut down) B.A.R.
U accuse him of having
boreing, tedious, humdrum bank robberies????
Shame on U, for defaming the dead!
izzythepush wrote:and demand more and more images of bank robberies.
I don't believe that anyone
has ever demanded pictures of rapes nor of sodomies.
izzythepush wrote:A photograph details actual events, writing can be fictional.
Yes.
Freedom of expression is Constitionally protected.
Violent felony is not. It shud be penalized as such.
In some jurisdictions, the death penalty was applied for rape.
In my opinion, that 's OK.
David