Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

That does not include seeking out and locking up all those who think of little girls in a sexual way out of fear that they might some day harm a little girl. That is nuts, that is criminalizing desire and is using our thoughts rather than our feelings as justification for punishing us

No I agree. There has to be some reason for belief that, that person may be dangerous to children, not a "thought".. If they "think" then they can put that person under surveylance for as long as needed and that will save that child.

Your paranoid hysteria really wears thin, in fact threadbare, from overuse on your part. It's a very tired routine

That does not include seeking out and locking up all those who think of little girls in a sexual way out of fear that they might some day harm a little girl. That is nuts, that is criminalizing desire and is using our thoughts rather than our feelings (should read "actions ")as justification for punishing us. We are all proud of ourselves for condoning homosexuality, we say that this makes us so much better than an ancestors, but we practice the exact same BS....only the target has changed.

We know through history where this train goes, once the state is allowed to claim the right to police our thoughts in one area it will always work to expand the claim. We see this right now as the American Government works to set up stooges on terrorism charges. What will be next? Something will until and unless we the people say ENOUGH!, and cut back the powers of the state in response to the states continual pattern of abuse of power.

Keep playing that card honey, it goes to show how dishonest you are.

More and more people are singing my tune all the time.

Denial by the apologists for the abusive state no longer works...

We are all proud of ourselves for condoning homosexuality, we say that this makes us so much better than an ancestors, but we practice the exact same BS....only the target has changed.

What's more important, Hawkeye, a pedophile having an orgasm, or stopping the sexual abuse and exploitation of the children in the pornographic images the pedophile uses for arousal and masturbation?

This is not the first time that we have seen a group claim that they have the right to try to stop any alleged sin by any means necessary

You didn't answer the question...

What's more important, Hawkeye, a pedophile having an orgasm, or stopping the sexual abuse and exploitation of the children in the pornographic images the pedophile uses for arousal and masturbation?

Justice demands that competing rights be mediated, and the child does not have an automatic right to short circuit that mediation with the demand that their rights always trump the rest of the society.

Sorry, the rest of the world has decided that the rights of children to be protected from sexual abuse and exploitation trumps the rights of pedophiles to seek and possess the sexualized images of children in child pornography for their own sexual gratification.

pedophiles have no "right" to sexually abuse or sexually exploit children.

Strange as no one is against hanging anyone who is a direct abuser of children however having and looking at pictures/videos of such abuse is a very very secondary abuse indeed!!!!!!

Kind of like saying that people who buy those old type real crime magazines and get off on the pictures of the cut up bodies should be lock up for as long or longer then the people who did those crimes.

More and more people are singing my tune all the time.

the fetish over the SAFETY! of the children has run its course...it is an indigence which we can no longer afford to maintain. It also no longer passes the laugh test, now that it is clear how badly the youth have been fucked by their irresponsible and self indigent elders.

Serious question: do you really think that the youth of today, who look around and see clearly how deep a hole they have been put in by their elders, are going to be impressed with the story told by your kind about how their interests are so important that they must have their rights truncated to promote their SAFETY!????

the fetish over the SAFETY! of the children has run its course...it is an indigence which we can no longer afford to maintain

is not a "very secondary abuse"--it is a continuation of the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of the child that began with the production/creation of the pornographic image, in fact the pornographic image was created for the pedophile/consumer, and it is the consumer who generates the demand for the creation of more

The fact of the matter is that your voice is mostly raised in solo protest.

Nonsense for the most part most such porn is gotten by way of p2p networks not purchase or traded directly.

There is trading and even some commerce manufacturing of such porn but it is hardly the bulk of such porn collecting..

I do not thinj that Hawkeye is a lonely voice crying out over this issue.