17
   

Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

NSFW Forums: News, Pervert, Child Pornography, Perverts, Creeps
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 09:30 am
@Ticomaya,
Quote:
No, but it's all that's needed, and it's all I'm going to do......................


Poor baby I feel sorry for you.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 12:12 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Bill is incredibly stupid if he thinks I went to public school. State secondary and proud of it. Don't you think it's interesting that he uses homosexuality as a term of abuse?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 12:19 pm
@Ticomaya,
Ticomaya wrote:

BillRM wrote:
Quote:
I think your A2K body of work speaks for itself.


That the best you can do????????????????

No, but it's all that's needed, and it's all I'm going to do......................


Just because even Bill isn't stupid enough to actually confess to owning child pornography, doesn't mean it's obvious he has it in his possession. Don't expect him to understand the distinction between implied and expressed. You are right though,
Quote:
it's all that's needed.
contrex
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 02:07 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

I thawt that it was the FRENCH
that were noted for homosexuality.


When I was a kid, we used to sing this in the playground:

"Yankee doodle, dirty fag
Got his boyfriend in a bag"

0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 02:20 pm
@izzythepush,
As i'm sure you know, what you call public school we call a private school. What you refer to as a state school, we call a public school. You're very likely to badly confuse Bill (unless he reads this, which is still no guarantee that he'll understand). However, confusing Bill is child's pay anyway.
BillRM
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 03:02 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
doesn't mean it's obvious he has it in his possession. Don't expect him to understand the distinction between implied and expressed. You are right though,


Frankly the logical way to act if someone is into CP would be like you are izzy pounding your chest over the subject and charging everyone else with this crime.

No izzy would never never had such material as look how anti-CP he is posting.

Kind of like Rush Limbaught yelling on his national radio show day after day how drug abusers need to be lock up and shown no mercy at the same time he was spending tens of thousands dollars a month on illegal pills.

So as confessions is good for the heart my kinky Englishman how and what type of CP is on your computers?
BillRM
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 03:07 pm
@izzythepush,
.
Quote:
Don't you think it's interesting that he uses homosexuality as a term of abuse?


Sorry with Firefly names calling Hawkeye for being into adult BDSM I forgot that homosexuality is acceptable now by your little group even if you still get to attack people for BDSM.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 03:33 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Sorry with Firefly names calling Hawkeye for being into adult BDSM I forgot that homosexuality is acceptable now by your little group even if you still get to attack people for BDSM.


You got to love how the feminists have written the theory of consent...they get to sell it as "though consent based sex you have the power to decide what is done to you" which sounds damn fantastic but then they have written into the theory a loop hole which puts all the power to the state. All the state has to do is decide what they dont like, then criminalize it because under the law a person can not consent to an illegal act. We have the right to be sexual in the way that the government has decided is A OK with them and that is all. Orwell would have been proud of the way the feminists have been able to use doublespeak to disguise abuse of government power.

The government has decided that fags are fine but people who like power with their sex are not. Who are we to disagree....and would it matter if we did?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 05:46 pm
@Setanta,
Whether or not Bill understands anything is one of life's mysteries. Frankly I'm amazed he remembers to breathe.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 05:53 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

So as confessions is good for the heart my kinky Englishman how and what type of CP is on your computers?


As the only security software I have on my computer is Norton internet security, the authorities will have no problem seeing what's on my computer.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 07:15 pm
@BillRM,

DAVID wrote:
I re-iterate that if children r held responsible to comply with the law,
then thay have a moral right of freedom to vote for politicians to defend their rights.
BillRM wrote:
At what age two months perhaps or two years or the age of six or................?
Age shoud not be a consideration.
No citizen who endeavors to vote (in the appropriate district)
shoud be rejected, unless he has already voted, Bill.





David
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 08:15 pm
This idea that we should just assume that every adult that come in contact with minors are child molesters or would be child molesters and set up safe guards as if that was the true state of affairs is insane.

There is a large costs for so doing such as interfering and limiting the used of the best tools to educate the next generation.

Then more important is the reduction of the normal level of trust/respect between teachers and students as everyone will know that the reason you can not just email Mr. X is the the school system and the society is concern that Mr.X might be a pedophile.

Then we are looking at not only are improper relationships rare no matter how many news stories you can get in a country of 300 millions that imply they are common, but where there is a will there is a way so all these insulting steps taken against innocent teachers are not likely to change the yearly numbers of improper students/teachers relationships.

As I said such relationships had been happening forever and there is no solid showing they are increasing that I had seen.

There was no internet, no cell phones, no texting and hardly any home phones when an english teacher ended up marrying one of my mother girl friends within weeks of her receiving her diploma.

hawkeye10
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 09:10 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
This idea that we should just assume that every adult that come in contact with minors are child molesters or would be child molesters and set up safe guards as if that was the true state of affairs is insane.


That is pretty much where we are....if you are in contact with a child for more than a random short interaction you damned well better be able to justify yourself. Just as we have made the default for men "potential rapist" when we insist upon interacting with females we are also "potential child abusers" when we are with children, such is the level of fear about men. When we decide that "men suck!" we dont fool around.
BillRM
 
  1  
Sun 18 Dec, 2011 09:29 pm
@hawkeye10,
What a strange and sad world firefly must live in, to fear every male that passed her by on the street or worst of all get into an elevator with her or.........

Surrounded by rapists or men who at the current moment are barely held in check by fear of punishment from being a rapist or a child abuser.

When she wish to give this "gift of fear" to all other women beginning in schools and even add women teachers as fear objects just for good measure.

Reaching the point where not only can I not go to a park to try to find homes for some kittens but if Firefly get her way not even my wife would be able to do so.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 03:34 am
@hawkeye10,
It's not men, it's people like you. You're not a man, you're a sad inadequate, **** knows what Bill is. We men are doing fine.
0 Replies
 
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 03:53 am
@BillRM,
I don't believe people just assume every (adult) or male for that matter maybe a child molester but don't you think that if there is any suspicion what so ever, then rightly so, a radar should go up?

I do... And why not

izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 04:02 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Of course Bill doesn't believe that. He has a history of violence towards women, forcing them to seek legal protection from him. He knows a great deal about obtaining child pornography. He's au fais with the child pornography laws around the globe. He has searched for child pornography on line. He has the same file sharing software that child ponographers use, and feels the need to secure his computer from police invesatigation. He goes into the park with kittens to try to meet children.

If that doesn't cause suspicion I don't know what does.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 08:38 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
Then more important is the reduction of the normal level of trust/respect
between teachers and students . . .
No one shoud trust anyone.
Recognizing human nature for what it is:
LOVE, admire, anyone u wish, but trust no one.

Trusting people is dangerously unwise
(e.g., a bride of my acquaintance who included her new husband
into access to her finances and was plundered of millions of dollars.
He then ran away with her eldest daughter, who threatened to kill
her mother, if she made any trouble).

How many juvenile celebrities have been financially raped
by their own parents (who had access to the kid's money),
leaving the kid near destitution ?





David
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 08:44 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
He has a history of violence towards women, forcing them to seek legal protection from him


History of violence toward women?

You mean every time some woman is willing to lied under oath to a court to get an order that they think might offer them a benefit in a divorce action that relate to the man having a history of violence toward women?

Sorry no court had ever found me guilty of any such crime and no hearing with both my then wife and I at it before a judge had rule that I am a abuser or that there was a reason to think I am an abuser.

Such orders are given out with zero proof needed at the require of any woman to the courts and at the time if you wish it thrown out the man needed to petition the court for a hearing as none otherwise would be held.

My lawyer told me that as I repeat I had already file for divorce the order was not worth fighting and I went alone with his advice in the matter.

My history is that I married a lying woman that turn out to have a drug problem and I divorce her and in my 26 years history with my current wife there had been not such charges level against me by her or any other woman for that matter.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 19 Dec, 2011 08:47 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:
My history is that I married a lying woman that turn out to have a drug problem and I divorce her and in my 26 years history with my current wife there had been not such charges level against me by her or any other woman for that matter.


Peter Sutcliffe said something similar.
 

Related Topics

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn - Discussion by tsarstepan
T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
RIP Professor Snape - Alan Rickman Passes at 69 - Discussion by engineer
Fergusonj shooting, autopsy in, all shots from front - Discussion by gungasnake
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Berry's desperate 911 call to police - Discussion by smithy988
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class
  3. » Page 55
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 03/12/2025 at 12:03:12
▲ ▼