17
   

Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 12 Dec, 2011 06:45 pm
@firefly,
It kind of amused me Firefly that you are claiming that I must had child porn on my computers systems as my set up does not allow any one but me to accesses them.

Not so amusing to me when you pull the same CP **** concerning my wife because I had placed equal protections on her computers for her.

Yes if you do not cheerfully allow people to crawl up your rear end you must be guilty of some crime or misdeed.

I been kind of disappoint so far that when going through US Customs no one had ask to look through my netbook computer as they claimed the right to do for all electronic devices.

Netbooks are cheap enough that I would enjoy them seizing ones of mine and spending a few hundreds thousands of dollars in computer time trying to break my security.

BillRM
 
  1  
Mon 12 Dec, 2011 10:33 pm
@firefly,
Oh Firefly, I am going to used your nonsense that anyone who have his or her computer protected is a criminal of some kind to point out to all of you once more that in airports alone many hundreds of thousands of laptops are lost or stolen every year in the US.

Think people of all the information you are likely to have on your traveling laptops and then think of the harm that information could do in dishonest hands.

More then likely that level of harm is many times more costly then the missing compute hardware.

At the very least set the hard drive password function found in the bios of all modern laptops and if you wish almost complete information security download the free software found at truecrypt.org and install it.

Yes old virgin men hating women might claimed your computer had CP on it as a result but that is a price that is cheap enough to pay at least in my opinion.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 02:19 am
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Why are you even re-hashing this stuff again? You are like a broken record.


Because, like a lot of paedophiles Bill enjoys the attention. He's a hypocrite, he's always slagging off the UK laws, and has no problems with seeing a man executed before important evidence is examined.

Maybe it's bravado, so far he's not been punished for the children he's abused, or maybe he's frightened, perhaps the Utah professor was in the same paedophile ring. Whatever his reason, it's a far cry from the slobbering excuses he posts.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:22 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
Netbooks are cheap enough that I would enjoy them seizing ones of mine and spending a few hundreds thousands of dollars in computer time trying to break my security.


Most serial "people" with a habit, of any form, love the game.. The idea of being caught, more so, the idea of catch me if you can, I am better than you, you won't find evidence.

That's just my take, given I studied physcology and the minds of true criminals, serial killers, child killers and the likes...

Each, claimed to have such a horrid childhood mainly what alot of us went through not enough love, poor me... You know? And, so then it was like revenge and the Devil got me.

I'm talking general off course.

But, that comment does have a hidden meaning of some sort Bill...

And, in addition the waste of tax payers money.

IMO.

Winning only works for so long.....
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:26 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Maybe it's bravado, so far he's not been punished for the children he's abused, or maybe he's frightened, perhaps the Utah professor was in the same paedophile ring. Whatever his reason, it's a far cry from the slobbering excuses he posts.


You and firefly could both used some serous mental health counseling in my opinion.

Yes your postings are amusing in the same sad way as Jgoldman postings can be until it drawn on you that such postings had been created by a very sick mind.

We had a sick woman that likely never had a normal sexual relationship in her long life due to her both fearing and hating at least the sexual aspects of men.

All men are either rapists or would be rapists barely held in check by strong laws and all women are either powerless victims of men or future victims of men if they let their guards down for a second.

You who hate and disrespected the US in so many ways and yet seems to prefer our crazy sexual laws to your nation more sane ones or at least wish to take that position to back firefly up against Hawkeye and I.

izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:41 am
@BillRM,
I'm not remotely interested in the opinions of a paedophile.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:49 am
@FOUND SOUL,
When my government misused it powers and break one of the most basic foundation of our founding fathers at the borders that the people had a right to be secure in their papers unless there is a clear reason dealing with an individual and a court order otherwise I see no reason not to waste their resources in that area.

As far as loving the game and being brighter then the government I am not in the game in that manner as there is nothing on my computers that is illegal in the first place.

I am just not willing to prove that point by allowing them to dig into my computers looking for such illegal materials.

Now I had seems some studies however that give you some support that some people collected child porn not so must for sexual reasons but because it is so highly illegal and therefore a challenge to get away with so doing.

In other words the very harsh and unreasonable punishments that the Fireflies of the world love is in fact resulting in more collecting and trading then would otherwise take place.

Hell there was more drinking not less during prohibition and women took up drinking in public setting for the first time also.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:55 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
As far as loving the game and being brighter then the government I am not in the game in that manner as there is nothing on my computers that is illegal in the first place.

I am just not willing to prove that point by allowing them to dig into my computers looking for such illegal materials.


Not in the game of child pornography? K... Not willing to prove that point, allowing them to dig into your computer?

There is something there to me, that doesn't make sense.

So what, rebelion?

izzythepush
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 03:58 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

As far as loving the game and being brighter then the government I am not in the game in that manner as there is nothing on my computers that is illegal in the first place.


We know that, you keep your child porn on CDs. You've already said that.
FOUND SOUL
 
  2  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 04:16 am
@izzythepush,
So one feels that it sucks that a career in Restaurants may fail brings up this case, in case, he gets caught is that right?

And, the only one backing him, has a backing up system to cover himself, right?

So why is Firefly the bad person in all of this?

Shakes head in wonder
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 04:46 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
We know that, you keep your child porn on CDs. You've already said that.


LOL would you like to find any such statement by me and post the link here?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 04:55 am
@FOUND SOUL,
They both skirt around the issue, but it's obvious what they both are. Bill's reraction to hearing about this case was to talk about the security on his computer. He knows a great deal about the child pornography market, and uses the same file sharing software that paedophiles use. He claims to be too smart to actually download it himself, preferring to buy it from other sources. He has admitted to deleting one piece of downloaded porn, because the girl was too young even for his tastes.

Firefly is a lovely lady, I've never seen any evidence of her hating men whatsoever. Similarly, the only person who has accused me of being anti- American is Bill, just because I don't accept his slobbering, ****-brained interpretation of History. It's almost as bad as his slobbering, ****-brained prose. For someone who claims to be an anglophile, he never misses an opportunity to insult and denigrate the UK. We could do without 'anglophiles' like that.
FOUND SOUL
 
  2  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:00 am
@izzythepush,
I'm enjoying getting to know everyone here...

And I can tell alot are respected, rightly so...

Firefly I don't know yet, but I've not liked some replies to her..and replied.

This is my take, being a newby..... here anyway.

The moment you go into protection mode you are hiding something.

I can't comment on your findings, yet, the detective in me might later:)
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:07 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
Not in the game of child pornography? K... Not willing to prove that point, allowing them to dig into your computer?

There is something there to me, that doesn't make sense.

So what, rebelion?


The rebellion is that my computers are my properties and I am going to keep whatever they contain private as a matter of principles not out of a need to do so concerning worries over legal issues.

Oh, for your information most large multinational corporations have problems with the idea that their employee’s companies computers contents can be search and copy at the US border or any other border for that matter at whim.

Their solution mainly is to give their international travelers wiped/clean computers and after the borders crossings used encrypted internet connections to download any confidential business information that might be needed from the internet/cloud.
FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:17 am
@BillRM,
trafficing? Making money from business men, security do that?

That sounds more like the Mafia.

But what would I know I am Australian.

It is your priogrative unless breaking the law

Why though are you so supportive of this thread? That Children undressed is "ok" as long as there is no "horrible" crime involved?

I get my child running around, laughing, naked. Shown only to my parents, husband, aunts, etc.

But?
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:25 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
and uses the same file sharing software that paedophiles use.


LOL along with tens of others millions people........p2p networks had as many uses as the internet as a whole does or almost as many uses. Only a small percent having anything to do with CP.

Quote:
preferring to buy it from other sources. He has admitted to deleting one piece of downloaded porn, because the girl was too young even for his tastes.


Who in their right mind would buy child porn???!!!!!?????

LOL my statement you are referring to was fairly clear I once downloaded a file that I had zero reason to think have anything to do with child porn and on looking at it I was not sure if one of the actresses in the video was or was not of legal age.

It could had been either way and to be on the safe side I wiped that file from my hard drive.

The US had for a numbers of years required that porn producers keep proof of the ages of their actors and actresses on file and give the address and name of the person holding that proof at the start of the video however videos downloaded off the net often does not contain such information so it up to the viewer to get rid of any such videos that there is any question about.

It does not happen often in fact it only happen to me once.

FOUND SOUL
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:28 am
@BillRM,
Sorry forgive me, and I am sure you will reply to my last post.

So you are just into porn of young women only, if they look maybe younger you panic and delete?

Yeah?
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:32 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
trafficing? Making money from business men, security do that?

That sounds more like the Mafia.


What are you talking about?

Most large companies had such things as prices lists and business plans and so on that could do great harm to them it if get out to others companies they are competing with.

Strangely they are therefore reluctant to trust that kind of informations that could be worth millions even to US customs employees let alone third world customs employees.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:32 am
Quote:
A 43-year-old Olympia man was arrested Friday on suspicion of possession of child pornography after his roommates reported finding sexually explicit images of juveniles on his computer equipment.
During a court hearing Monday, a Thurston County Superior Court judge ordered Christopher Buhi held without bail at the Thurston County Jail on suspicion of three counts of possession of depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
According to court papers, Olympia police began an investigation into the 43-year-old software company employee in August. That’s when two roommates reported to police that they had inadvertently come across child pornography while using an external hard drive belonging to the suspect. One roommate also reported that the man “frequently sought out areas in which children could be found playing and photographed them,” court papers say.
The hard drive contained “numerous photographs of female children who appeared to be under the age of 10 engaged in sexually explicit conduct.”
During a follow-up conversation in September, one of the roommates told a detective that the man had engaged in other “inappropriate behavior that made her feel uncomfortable.”
Olympia police detective Brenda Anderson said Monday that police were still in the early stages of their investigation and were reviewing a large amount of computer equipment from the suspect’s home.
Detective Rebecca Fayette, who is reviewing the computer equipment, told Anderson that she has already located a significant amount of child pornography. The children are from ages 3-9, court papers state.
“In addition to the child pornography … , there also were numerous images of school-age children at play. These images included groups of children at playgrounds, school functions and a parade,” court papers state.
Police arrested Buhi on Friday near his home in the 1100 block of Brawne Avenue Northwest. He has no prior criminal history.


Read more: http://www.theolympian.com/2011/12/13/1911491/no-bail-for-man-facing-child-porn.html#ixzz1gPgd861I


Here we have a local alleged crime that is so minor that it took cops 4 months to decide to arrest the perp, and so heinous that he is not allowed bail. I note with interest that being told that he has innocent pictures of kids being kids is supposed to convince us that he is a bad guy.
BillRM
 
  1  
Tue 13 Dec, 2011 05:48 am
@FOUND SOUL,
Quote:
So you are just into porn of young women only, if they look maybe younger you panic and delete?


As a matter of fact I am into porn of older women for the most part however p2p networks is not that fine tune.

No I did not panic I did what I consider the sane thing to do if there is any possible question you wiped not just delete such porn off your hard drive as the US law does not care one little bit about intend in this area.

I never gotten no question about it child porn over the internet or in any other manner thank god and if that event ever did happen to me I more then likely would wiped it and then drill holes in the hard drive before throwing it away.

US law call for a minimum sentence that is longer then CA set as a maximum sentence for the crime of manslaughter for example so encrypted or not encrypted wiped or not wiped drilling holes in the drive would be the last step in removing such from my home.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 01/22/2025 at 04:12:07