17
   

Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class

NSFW Forums: News, Pervert, Child Pornography, Perverts, Creeps
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 08:38 am
@firefly,
Quote:
In a thread on child pornography? Yes, that is the topic I'd rather discuss.

Then have at it; but, understand, at times other topics do come in and people will respond.

0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 08:42 am
@firefly,
Quote:
I didn't expect you to understand that article--or to acknowledge the significant influence of the internet in supporting, encouraging, and promoting pedophilia, or the fact that the child pornography trading is a part of that.

And you just proved that.


Significant/impact of the interent in all areas of life in almost a given for both good and for evil.

Quote:
And you just proved that


No need to prove that the internet allow the moving of any form of information/communication that is almost impossible to block that is the nature of the internet be that information just your credit cards bills or CP files or released government secrets.

Or that it does allow and aid small groups to form inspite of any governments efforts to block them from forming such as revolutionaries groups in the middle east or pedophiles groups in the West.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 08:49 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Your vocabulary is limited. Try using a dictionary. Not everyone wants to "dumb down" for your benefit


I am clearly not as must of an expert on sexual deviants as you and izzy seems to be to know uncommon terms concerning the matter.

But maybe given the history of the upper elite sending their sons to one sex boarding schools such a term would be more commonly known in the UK then in the US.
Sturgis
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:02 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
I am clearly not as must of an expert on sexual deviants as you and izzy seems to be to know uncommon terms concerning the matter.
iT.P. and friends, including the imaginary daughter, are well versed in all things about sex and pedophiles. They know all the words, all the lures, they even know precisely how each sexual interaction goes down. Why I.T.P can spot a pedophile at 10,000 paces! (and all while bouncing his imaginary son on his knee).



Most interesting here is how ITP has decided to insinuate that I am a pedophile, yet his little cronies have no trouble with that, instead they focus on it going something like this:

"I want the thread to go back to talking about the original topic, not history!"

"you mean pedophilia?"

"Oh yes, yes, Yes!"



so are any of you cowards planning to step up and call izzy on his disgraceful insinuations?
firefly
 
  3  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:05 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
I am clearly not as must of an expert on sexual deviants as you and izzy seems to be to know uncommon terms concerning the matter.

No, it means your vocabulary is limited. All you had to do was use a dictionary, dummy--that's how people learn new words. You'd rather announce your ignorance.
You do know how to use a dictionary don't you?

If you had bothered to read and think about the NYT article I posted, you would have learned something about "sexual deviants". You don't seem to have learned anything about pedophilia at all. That's why you can't understand the role of child pornography either.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:12 am
@Sturgis,
Quote:
so are any of you cowards planning to step up and call izzy on his disgraceful insinuations?


Come on both Izzy and Firefly had been getting away with such nonsense forever and for example because I disagree with some aspects of the DUI laws in the US in Firefly eyes I am a proven to be a person that drive drunk often.

Those Argumentum ad Hominem attacks are an important tool for them in debates of any kind.

0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:24 am
@Sturgis,
Quote:
so are any of you cowards planning to step up and call izzy on his disgraceful insinuations?

I've had BillRM and Hawkeye weaving elaborate fantasies about me, in thread after thread, including sexual fantasies about me, and tacking all sorts of outrageous labels on me, none of which have the slightest connection to reality, or to anything I've actually said in my posts.
I never noticed you rushing in to call them out when they do that to me. And they do that sort of thing constantly.

You just suddenly show up here, in a thread about child pornography, to discuss WWII. Rolling Eyes

I think both you and izzy are quite capable of settling this between yourselves--you don't need to call in the cavalry, and derail the thread even more. I have no idea why izzy said what he did, nor do I appreciate being referred to as a "coward" or one of his "little cronnies". If you don't like name calling, don't do it yourself.



BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:40 am
@firefly,
Quote:
I've had BillRM and Hawkeye weaving elaborate fantasies about me, in thread after thread


Quote:
and tacking all sorts of outrageous labels on me, none of which have the slightest connection to reality,


Sure dear you do not used routinely personal attacks on anyone who disagree with you and as far as labeling/libeling people according to you I am a pedophile who drive drunk often.

More then likely driving drunk to the local NAMBLA weekly cook out.

Sturgis
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:46 am
@firefly,
Quote:

I've had BillRM and Hawkeye weaving elaborate fantasies about me, in thread after thread, including sexual fantasies about me, and tacking all sorts of outrageous labels on me, none of which have the slightest connection to reality, or to anything I've actually said in my posts.
I never noticed you rushing in to call them out when they do that to me. And they do that sort of thing constantly.

You just suddenly show up here, in a thread about child pornography, to discuss WWII.

I only re-entered the thread today in order to make a response to izzy. Most times I haven't been observing this thread as I noticed early on, people were more into back and forth attacks than discussing the actual facts of the original case.

When I see slanderous attacks, I usually make a comment to the defense of the person being attacked. Not always; but in most cases will. Truth be known, I haven't seen any against you. I have seen izzy calling Bill, Hawkeye and me pedophiles. Izzy has spent weeks now calling me several names and making slanderous comments about me.

Quote:
I think both you and izzy are quite capable of settling this between yourselves--you don't need to call in the cavalry, and derail the thread even more. I have no idea why izzy said what he did, nor do I appreciate being referred to as a "coward" or one of his "little cronnies".
It's impossible to settle anything with izzy since, for him everything has to be in 100% agreement with him or a person is called any one of the several disparaging terms he has at the ready. Buzz, Cryptkeeper, etc. etc.
Further, he has supposedly placed me on ignore, so I need others to intercede when he makes comments about me.

The only reason you would even think that you were in the group being referred to as cowards and cronies would be if you were one. I didn't mention your name or any name other than izzy and my request was that someone address what he was doing. So why exactly do you think you are one of the cowards and cronies?


Lastly, as I pointed out earlier, the thread was not being intentionally derailed. A conversation was taking place, one poster made a comment, another was made, eventually something which was inaccurate was posted, I responded. It took a mere matter of minutes for izzy to then insinuate that I am a pedophile. Was I to just casually allow that?

I think I will now discuss the proper method of gathering crops east of the tundra. Hell, I'll discuss anything I damn well choose to in this thread or any other thread and if people choose to respond then they will and if they don't then they won't.
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 10:34 am
@Sturgis,
Sturgis the lady even once ask me if my wife repeat my wife had a child porn collection base on a statement of mine that I had placed truecrypt on my wife computers.

She had as must shame or lack of shame as izzy and is a slightly brighter female version or izzy or the other way around.

Footnote my wife had never taken any part on this website and is not even a member yet Firefly feel free to libel her in that manner.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:07 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
according to you I am a pedophile who drive drunk often.

And those are the kindest things I think about you.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:21 pm
@firefly,
And it's not like he doesn't give the impression that's what he is.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:21 pm
@Sturgis,
Quote:
I only re-entered the thread today in order to make a response to izzy.

Quote:
Further, he has supposedly placed me on ignore...


So, posting about WWII, in a thread about child pornography, simply in order to respond to izzy, who has you on ignore, meaning he wouldn't see your post, makes sense to you? Rolling Eyes
Quote:
Lastly, as I pointed out earlier, the thread was not being intentionally derailed

Why would you follow izzy around, including to this particular thread, if you think it's " impossible to settle anything with izzy"--unless you came in here to deliberately start a fight with him. I'm not so sure that the thread wasn't deliberately derailed because you were looking for a fight. You admit you posted in here only to respond to him. He didn't go looking for you, you came in here, to go after him.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:22 pm
@firefly,
It's like being stalked by the Cryptkeeper.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:25 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
And those are the kindest things I think about you.


And first of all does that give you a license to libel my wife who had taken no part in this website base only on my comment that I had installed truecrypt on her computers a program that had been installed on millions of computers both personal and business computers and in some government computers even?

Second your comments had gone way beyond expressing an opinion on this website and if this was the real offline world and you had make such public comments without any evidence beyond the person daring to disagree with you concerning the laws on DUI and CP you would had ended up homeless without a dime to your name.

Too bad you can not debate issues without feeling the need for personal attacks and if you get careless and do similar behaviors in real life you are going to be in a world of hurt.
firefly
 
  3  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:31 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
And first of all does that give you a license to libel my wife...

As you admit, I simply asked a question, I did not accuse your wife of anything.

But, I must say, any woman who chooses to live with someone like you must be out of her mind or desperate. No wonder she sleeps with a gun. Laughing

For something to be libelous, it has to be untrue. Smile

And, given your reputation at A2K, it's hard to show damages. Laughing One has to have a reputation to protect. Laughing
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:35 pm
@firefly,
Let's not forget that Bill's natural reaction to hearing about computerised child pornography was to go on about his, and his wife's, computer security.
firefly
 
  2  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:38 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:

Let's not forget that Bill's natural reaction to hearing about computerised child pornography was to go on about his, and his wife's, computer security.

In fact, it's mainly in the child pornography threads (and there have been a few), that he choses to give his helpful tips on how to encypt your computer.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 01:41 pm
@firefly,
He does it time and time again, he says some pretty outrageous things then acts astonished when his words come back to haunt him. Nobody accused him of hanging out in the park with kittens, that was something he brought up.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Wed 7 Mar, 2012 02:03 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
As you admit, I simply asked a question, I did not accuse your wife of anything


LOL I can just see/picture you trying that in a civil court room in front of a civil jury.

In a way I wish you do not know better and therefore will pull such silliness in the real world but I fear you do know better and is just being your dishonest self.
 

Related Topics

Another major school shooting today ... Newtown, Conn - Discussion by tsarstepan
T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
RIP Professor Snape - Alan Rickman Passes at 69 - Discussion by engineer
Fergusonj shooting, autopsy in, all shots from front - Discussion by gungasnake
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Berry's desperate 911 call to police - Discussion by smithy988
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Man's life Over, Cops Decide He Watched Child Porn in First Class
  3. » Page 104
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 05:39:43
▲ ▼