47
   

Two weeks into Occupy Wall Street protests, movement is at a crossroads

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 03:22 pm


You libtards are so dumb
0 Replies
 
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 03:29 pm
Quote:
(Reuters) - A federal judge denied a petition on Tuesday that would have allowed anti-Wall Street protesters to keep camping -- at least temporarily -- in two parks in the nation's capital where they have lived for months.

The National Park Service had banned protesters with the Occupy DC movement from camping in McPherson Square, a few blocks from the White House, starting at noon on Monday.

Scores of protesters have vowed to remain entrenched at the square and at a second site, Freedom Plaza. The demonstrators have been camped at the parks since October.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg rejected a motion by Dane Primerano, of Riceboro, Georgia, for a temporary restraining order halting enforcement of the no-camping rule based on constitutional guarantees of free speech.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/31/us-usa-protests-washington-idUSTRE80T0XW20120131

H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 03:54 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Lustig Andrei wrote:

Quote:
(Reuters) -

A federal judge denied a petition on Tuesday that would have allowed anti-Wall Street protesters to keep camping





Excellent!
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 04:03 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKUOB8MN4Kc
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 04:05 pm


I guess the judge didn't deny the Occutards their Pelosi blessed right to Dump Condoms on Catholic School Girls
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 04:08 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
From the Reuters article:
Quote:
The judge, in declining to halt enforcement of the no-camping rule, cited a 1984 Supreme Court ruling that barred demonstrators from camping in Lafayette Park next to the White House to draw attention to the plight of the homeless.


This same 1984 decision, known as the "Clark decision," has been used to deny similar motions made by other Occupy groups in other cities. This indicates to me that local jurisdictions are not improvising rules to thwart Occupy groups. Since 1984 it has been a matter of settled law that the freedom of assembly does not include prolonged camping out.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 04:12 pm
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 04:12 pm
@wandeljw,
If it was perfectly legal I don't think they would be doing it. If they are not ignored it is encouragement. We should be able to work around a few tents.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 05:12 pm
As an aside, we've had a tent embassy on the lawns of the old Parliament House for forty years. Video below.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-01-25/aboriginal-embassy-marks-40-years/3793702
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 05:44 pm
@Builder,
That was interesting thank you for sharing.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 05:44 pm
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 06:42 pm
0 Replies
 
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:11 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

The irony of the police dismantling of occupy groups is that they are destroying the very people who are fighting for the middle class - and them.




they really are not fighting.. if they expect respect they will have to show what they will die and kill for.. short of that they are an inconvenience to the very people they want to serve.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 08:14 pm
@Fido,
Your lonely perspective of the Occupiers.
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Jan, 2012 09:25 pm
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2012/0131/Occupy-Wall-St.-nonviolence-Is-Oakland-the-exception-or-the-future

The Christian Science Monitor's take on the siruation:

Quote:
As Occupy groups in Washington and Oakland generate contrasting images of Dream tents on the one coast and flag burning on the other, it’s becoming clear that the four month-old protest movement is facing its Hamlet moment: to be or not to be nonviolent.


But despite pleas from many, including the movement’s earliest members, there is no unity on this thorny, even decisive, issue.

“Occupy’s strength has been that as a movement dedicated to nonviolent direct action it claimed to follow in the footsteps of Martin Luther King, Jr.,” says Catherine Wilson, a political science professor at Villanova University in Philadelphia, via email.


(more at link)
0 Replies
 
Fido
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 06:14 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Your lonely perspective of the Occupiers.
I am not complaining... People do out of necessity... Today they protest, and protests are easily dismissed, even when tolerated... If you must protest, you protest... If you must act, you act.... The protesters plead for justice and common sense in our economy... They do no more than the prophet Amos, and with as little effect... No one protest or prophesies without hope... Without hope, one either stands aside, or attacks what is... There is always the option of opening a vein, and saying good bye to a cruel world... People should fight back, and make certain they are hitting their mark...
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 07:59 am
@Fido,



That's one of the problems with the Occutards, they have never clearly identified their mark.
The Obama liberal media had no problem with this and the Occutards were embraced and blessed.

The T.E.A. Party clearly identified their mark and then hit their mark.
The Obama liberal media payed little attention to them and demonized them.

The dumbmasses are taught that doing it all wrong has its rewards and that doing it 100% correct is wrong.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 08:06 am
@H2O MAN,
Are you talking about the followers of Saul Alinsky? That TEA party?
http://able2know.org/topic/183929-1
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 08:17 am
@parados,


That would be Obama following Alinsky, yes Obama and his Occutards.
parados
 
  2  
Reply Wed 1 Feb, 2012 08:23 am
@H2O MAN,
LOL.. you are the one that is acting in the fashion Saul Alinsky said.
You are the one that is an admitted member of a group that admits it reads and acts like Saul Alinsky said.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 02:35:50