The Communist Origin of the Modern Conservative Movement VI

The constitution grants every American the right for peaceful demonstrations. The National Guard had absolutely no right to abridge those rights.

Do you go ask for permission to park at the mall?

When the AR-15 was designed it was designed for mass murder.

You don't need to fire at a 900 round a minute to shoot one dear.

All insurance policies have a limit and the company is responsible for any award over that limit. When you buy a company, you assume responsible accounts receivable and accounts payable. Otherwise, once a company was sued, they would simply sell all the assets.

Since Remington made them and sold them, they are the experts selling weapons of war to the public.

The automatics are being sold and owned today they just need to be tweaked.

There are no statistics because you cannot count what you don't know. But the.01% figure is no doubt low.

Law abiding people will follow the law as long as they believe there is a chance of being caught. If they believe there is not a reasonable chance of being caught they don't pay. Studies show when a price is posted for coffee at work many people avoid paying. Put a camera in and almost everyone pays.

Criminals know the statistics and they know that there is only a 1% chance they will ever serving a day in jail for most crimes. They will laugh at the police for working for a living.

I would not be surprised if there is a You Tube video showing people how to convert them. It might be illegal to convert them but not illegal to show people how.

If I was going to make a change it would be to ban all guns except shotguns.

What makes you think they don't own them now?

You could have a number of things that are unique but that is not why patents are granted.

There has to be a major design improvement.

The Thompson can only fire at a rate of 450 rounds improvement the AR-15 can fire twice as fast.

That is why they got a patent.

If the experts that manufactured them say they are the same guns, they are.

They are for hunting humans

and that is why the military uses them.

What type of weapons would you buy for the battlefield?

Once they are converted them there is no difference between them.

The AR-15 is a huge improvement over the Thomson

that why armies no longer use Thompsons.

Why do you think Thompsons were banned? They made too much noise?

All insurance policies have limits and case award is likely to be more than $50 million if it falls in line with other wrongful death suits.

The supreme court has allowed the Texas law on abortion to go in effect

Since the government does not do the enforcement that eliminates the problem with banning guns.

It can't be legal for one and illegal for others.

All insurance policies have a limit and the company is responsible for any award over that limit. When you buy a company, you assume responsible accounts receivable and accounts payable.

Q: Last question: Will my new 870 be a Remington 870 or a RemArms 870?
A: Our name is RemArms LLC, but we own the rights to call the guns "Remingtons." Your new 870 will say "Remington" on the receiver.

The AR-15 is a military weapon,

and it is designed to kill as many people as fast possible.

The AR-15 has been recorded firing at a 900 round per minute rate.

It fires so fast it melts the barrel down.

You can only appeal so many times

and your appeal can be turned down. Jury awards not only actual damages but punitive damages. If the jury got one look at You Tube video of the AR-15 being fired, they would award them several $100 million.

The people that made the AR-15 are the experts.

Our prisons are full of people that did illegal things.

You don't need a 3D printer the parts are available, but they caution not to buy all the parts in the same place.

A shot gun will stop anyone.

Haven't you heard the NRA went bankrupt and we are just waiting to see how many of the crooks go to prison. They are not stopping anyone these days.

How many people are in prison because they did illegal things?

I could make a number of unique statues, but none would qualify for a patent because they were not a major improvement.

Seeing is believing but counting that fast is hard.

You have to show that you made a major improvement in order to get a patent.

If a qualified expert made the statement, then you would have to disprove it

and you can't.

If the gun is designed and sold to military, we know they don't exist to hunt deer, the military hunts humans.

The mistake was letting them sell a weapon designed for the military to the public in the first place.

Making a law against wife beating did not stop anyone that decided they were going to beat their wife.

If the AR-15 was not a huge improvement the army would still be using Thompsons.

Armies would still use the Thompsons if they were superior to the AR-15.

Armies will buy the best mass murder weapons they can buy and that is the AR-15.

And what does a full-automatic do that other guns don't? It fires at 100s of rounds a minute.

At some point you have to face reality, we have a mass murder problem in America, and it is the military weapons that make them possible. The legal system is designed to solve the problem.

Trump stacked the deck and there is not a chance in hell they will overturn it. They were appointed to ban abortion, and this is their chance.

If it works for one, it works for the other.

When this lawsuit is won

it will set the standard for what happens to gun manufactures who want to market weapons of war for the street.

In view of the lawsuits some gun manufacturers have decided to stop selling weapons of war on the streets.

Remington will not get away with trying to hide their assets the court will see to that.

The fact that two of the insurance companies have already offered $3.6 million shows that they know they are going to lose and are trying to limit their liability.

If I was going to make a change it would be to ban all guns except shotguns.

You can claim an elephant is not an elephant but that does not make it so.

The AR-15 was designed as military weapon

and the experts who made it will agree.

It was designed for mass murder.

To give one solider the ability to slaughter as many of the enemy as possible.

When a gun nut decides to see how many people he can kill, we can see how extremely effective the design is in the number of bodies left in a few minutes.

Do you really believe that military would purchase guns based on the fewest people killed?

The AR-15 fires bullets so fast the barrel actually melts down.

If seeing is believing, there is a You Tube video where they show how many rounds it takes to melt the barrel down.

You can only appeal to a higher court and there are only a few levels of courts.

There are 26 victims here and 20 of them are small children. There is one thing a trial lawyers dreads worse than anything and that is having a small child as a victim of negligence and in this case, there are 20. Most lawyers would refuse this case even if they died in a car accident but to be slaughter like animals is a completely different problem.

Most companies when they realize they are losing a multi-million-dollar lawsuit will take steps to protect their assets and most of the time they are fraudulent schemes.

The fact that it is the same gun. It is like Smokey Yunick told people after he lost his GMC truck dealership, Chevrolet makes the trucks and GMC makes hub caps emblems.

The chances of being caught with a converted AR-15 are near zero until you kill 50 school children. Being convicted after the fact is next to meaningless.

The parts are quite legal.

How are the people who have a license to own machine guns going to repair their AR-15s?

I don't think most criminals are going to wear bullet proof vests

and a head shot would stop them.

All of the NRA resources are going to keep those crooks out of jail. There is a recent book where an insider shows all the way the NRA was screwing its membership.

There are crimes that are easily caught and crimes that it is extremely hard to catch. Converting AR-15s would be extremely hard to police.

If you made a gun with a 3-foot barrel, it would be unique

but would not qualify for patent because gun barrels do the same thing but come up with a way to chamber rounds at a 900 round per minute rate and you can patent that.

The demonstration had the gun, they chambered one clip after another and could accurately count the rounds fired and the time it took to fire them.

You could put groves down your gun barrel, but you could not patent that because it does not change the function of the barrel. Your barrel may be unique, but it did not change the function of the gun.

We rely on experts for a reason they are far more knowledgeable about the area of expertise than the general public.

It is the same gun only the hubcaps and emblems are different.

As soon as the military saw the AR-15 they started ordering them.

In the history there was no gun that would allow the slaughter of so many by so few.

The guy that designed the AR-15 was ex-military and he designed with that purpose in mind.

Nothing wrong with slaughtering 20 small children either?

A 2021 car is far superior to a 1930 model.

Guns are the same way a gun made in 1930 is not near as good as one made in 2021

but AR-15 even though it was made 50 years ago is still used today because it was such a revolutionary improvement.

Once the AR-15 is converted it is full-automatic.

An Army's mission is to kill as many of the enemy as possible as quickly as possible to win the war. Mass murder is the object of war.

The AR-15s used in the bank robbery in LA fired much faster than any Thompson ever made.

The AR-15 semi-automatic and the AR-15 come down the same assembly line and use the same parts. They are the same gun with the exception of 3 tiny parts that can be changed.

The beauty of the Texas law is it takes government out of the abortion controversy and leaves it up to bounty hunters to enforce it. This takes the supreme court out of it.

Wrong, the government is taken out of it.

It is one citizen enforcing it against each other.

In this type of law, the government is not taking your gun it is your neighbor and he did not grant you a second amendment.

The realty that jury will be looking at is the pictures of the bodies 20 small children, some shot 20-30 times, with a weapon of war that the company was glorifying in adds.

The only reason the company was pushing weapons of war is that they are extremely profitable.

Those jurors will never ever be able to get those pictures out of their minds and only one thing made that slaughter possible, that weapon of war.

The lawsuit is about what made that slaughter possible and that is weapons designed to slaughter people.

The question will be how many more slaughters of children are we going to allow, before we put a stop to it.

Without a gun designed for mass murder this would not have happened.

It is no longer a question of whether weapons designed for mass murder will be banned it is only question of how many more children will be slaughtered before they are banned.

The AR-15 is far superior to the Thompson machine gun.

Just as a 2021 car is far superior to a 1930 car.

It does far more damage, much quicker.

That why the special forces, doesn't use Thompsons.

That is a fraction of what they are liable for it will end up being much more.

You can only take someone assets if you can prove that it is a frivolous suit.

There is nothing frivolous about this lawsuit.

The trouble is that it is not only me it is the experts that made and designed the mass murder weapons that agree.

The semi-automatic and full-automatic are the same gun

and were made under the same revolutionary patent for using the exhaust from firing one round to chamber the next round. This makes even the semi-automatic far superior to other semi-automatics.

It can actually chamber the rounds faster than you can pull the trigger.

The experts don't make me wrong they make you wrong.

The semi-automatic version is almost as deadly with over 50 people killed in a few minutes.

If it was not designed for mass murder it does one hell of a job.

How many mass murders have happened with a gun that wasn't designed for mass murder?

The only reason the AR-15 was granted a patent was that it was far superior to other semi-automatics.

Remington built and marketed a weapon designed for mass murder to the public

The person that supplies the death weapon to a murder is also guilty.

You have no idea who is involved in the sale of the company and whether it was sold at a fair market value.

They will never be able to seize anyone's home

this is not a frivolous lawsuit.

The defendants have already made a settlement offer.

When the AR-15 comes down the assembly line it can be either a full-automatic or a semi-automatic. It is the same gun.

When a mass murder takes place, we don't get all the details and I doubt the police would test fire the murder weapon to see if it was an automatic. They look exactly alike, and the small parts are internal.

The parts were openly sold in magazines, full automatics might be illegal but not the parts.

Where do you think these people that have full automatics got the parts? There are no laws against parts the government would have to have a source to repair their automatics.

They would be very likely to have an AR-15 since it is far superior to a machine gun.

In my 42 years with the city, I cannot recall one criminal ever being arrested with a bullet proof vest. Most are too poor to afford one.

Head shot with a shot gun should not be hard, especially with a wide pattern.

I have read the book on the NRA and there were some real criminals heading the NRA and they are being prosecuted by the federal government even while Trump was still in office.

I don't see many people being prosecuted for converting AR-15s even when law enforcement is aware of who is doing it.

Then let's make it a ten-foot barrel, is that unique enough.

Machine guns are illegal but AR-15s aren't, we need to correct that.

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.

The AR-15 takes advantage of all the design advantages of the full-automatic except one.

The semi-automatic AR-15 is still capable of chamber shells at as fast as full-automatic and it is limited only by how fast you can pull the trigger.

The AR-15 is a modern-day machine gun that is limited only by how fast you can pull the trigger.

The US military assigned it a different number M-16 but as the experts at Remington made clear it is the same gun with only slight differences.

How many people does it take to carry that machine gun? Its size would make it impractical to kill 20 first graders with.

To start with he did not design the AR-15 as a semi-automatic it was designed as a full-automatic, but they could not sell that on the street because full-automatics are illegal they had to dummy it down a little to be able sell it on the street. There is only one design that is slightly modified. He never went back and designed a different gun they just modified the automatic.

That is exactly why every effort should be made to stop murder.

If you want to stop a carpenter from building a house, take his tools. If you want to stop a mass murderer, take his tools, AR-15.

You are comparing oranges to apples.

The AR-15 is a full-automatic that has been restricted.

What that does not explain is why other weapons are not the choice of mass murderers.

YThe AR-15 are the overwhelming choice of mass murders because the design is so superior.

If you really want to kill a number of school children that is your best bet.

Most of the criminals are carrying guns though it is illegal and they will spend ten years in jail.

The AR-15 is the same design just slightly modified.

There are advantages for every design while one may be better for war anther may be better for school mass murders.

There is no law that outlaws parts, the same parts may be used in several other applications.

The supreme court had a chance to stop the Texas law and they decided to green light it.

The government does not enforce that law.

It is only a civil suit that decides the disputes between citizens.

The supreme court has already green lighted the Texas law, it is now in full effect in Texas.