The only reason you would like to have 2,000 categories is by dividing them up it would hide the problem.
The cases in court are being ruled that way. You can get in a fight go back to your car and get your gun and shoot all kinds of people and be found innocent based on the stand your ground law. You can even shoot people that you were not fighting with. It is open season your pride has been injured.
Seven of the top ten worst massacres of all times occurred after the assault weapon ban expired. That is no coincidence. It had a huge effect on massacres. And the other thee on the top ten massacre list took place before the assault weapon ban took effect in 1994. None of the top 10 massacres took place during the ten years the assault weapon were banned. That is an unrefuted fact.
The constitution only guarantees you that you will have an arm to bear not any weapon whatsoever.
If there was a big outcry from the gun nut crowd over the assault weapon ban why did the gun manufactures not take it to court? Because they knew they would lose.
Selling body parts is not a bodily function.
Government maintains extensive control over the market place even inspecting food before it is sold.
Abortions can be done with pills now without a medical procedure.
I don’t know of one single person who ever had abortion.
Abstinence is the only birth control that does fail sometime.
It isn’t a strawman people have a right to pursuit of happiness. It seems like happiness is killing as many people as possible as fast possible. Why should driving be privilege, if it makes you happy it is a right. BTW privilege is defined as a right.
Pursuit of happiness is a right and driving at 120 mph makes a lot of people very happy. Right incase a lot more than you realize.
Massacres are also illegal but it has never stopped anyone.
The law on bump-stocks has not changed there is only an executive order that can be eliminated in an instant.
After Feds ban bump stocks, none turned into local police ...
The reason this definition works is you don’t have to guess why the victims were killed.
Was it a bank robbery, murder suicide, road rage, maybe they thought they were shooting aliens from mars? There is only one thing that matters the number of people killed and wounded.
The only reason you would like to have 2,000 categories is by dividing them up it would hide the problem.
The cases in court are being ruled that way. You can get in a fight go back to your car and get your gun and shoot all kinds of people and be found innocent based on the stand your ground law. You can even shoot people that you were not fighting with. It is open season your pride has been injured.
Student pleads guilty in shooting death on Northern Arizona ...
www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-7871461 › Ex-student-pleads-g...
1. Cached
Jan 9, 2020 - A former Northern Arizona University student has admitted to fatally ... to face a second murder trial, after his first trial in 2017 ended in a hung jury. ... initially stoked fears of a mass shooting at Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. ... got ENGAGED in 2018 after ending five-year romance with Jack Antonoff.
Seven of the top ten worst massacres of all times occurred after the assault weapon ban expired.
The constitution only guarantees you that you will have an arm to bear not any weapon whatsoever.
This shooting demonstrates why mass murderers want to make sure they are armed with assault weapons. This idiot bought a shot gun when he needed an AR-15. If he had an AR-15 firing at a 130 rounds a minute, like the Pulse Night Club shooter, there would have been 5 dead
gun nuts.
The Police department has yet to decide what to do with the gun nuts. The investigation is not over. It came near being a tragedy because witnesses believed there was more than one shooter as did the other gun nut who went after their guns. Soon there would have been many shooters shooting at each other. The police were there within a minute and a half and the gun nuts should have let the police do their job.
More guns more deaths.
It is not necessary to fire 900 rounds a minute to massacre 50 people it took only 130 round a minute firing rate to kill 50 people.
The AR-15 is designed to fire at a 900 round a minute a rate you need only take advantage of the guns design.
We know for a fact a 130 round per minute rate can be achieved because the Pulse mass murderer was recorded firing at that rate.
You don't have to achieve that full rate of 900 rounds a minute for a massacre.
There have been many massacres already with semi-automatic assault weapons.
It is the semi-automatic that are responsible for massacres.
There was a third video that I posted that showed how easily an AR-15 could be modified to fire automatic.
There have been several mass shootings using modified assault weapons.
Why worry about being shot with a modified AR-15 when a semi-automatic version of an assault weapon can kill 50 in a few minutes?
The semi-automatic version takes advantage of all the design improvements inherent in the weapons design.
I posted the video that showed how easily the AR-15s can be modified.
It is only necessary for the semi-automatic to fire fast enough to kill 50 people in two minutes.
Some street cars are capable of 232 mph but it is not likely anyone will ever drive it that fast. They don't need all that speed it is the same with an AR-15 they don't need to fire at 900 rounds per minute rate.
I think the videos showed the modified AR-15s being fired at 900 round per minute rate. Get your stopwatch out and count the rounds.
There is not anything unconstitutional about it,
the second amendment says only that you have a right to keep and bear arms.
Nowhere in there does it say you have a right to 30 round clips.
The supreme court has ruled that you are not entitled to any weapon whatsoever for any purpose whatsoever. I don't think they stuttered.
According to the online video it is extremely easy.
You don't understand that you don't get to make up the definition of assault weapons.
Not only has the Federal government defined what an assault weapon is, ten states have also made the legal definition assault weapon as a semi-automatic assault weapon.
We all know what the legal definition of an assault weapon is because it is written into the law.
Semi-automatic assault weapons are what makes massacres possible and that is why even the states are outlawing them.
The subject is massacres, not gun violence in general, and massacres are not only more frequent but far deadlier.
The Republicans in the WV legislature tried to pass a bill so every college student could carry a gun.
They had enough votes to pass it but it was derailed at the last minute. You can bet the gun manufacturers were making political contributions to anyone who voted for their bill. Think how many more guns they could sell. Just as they were marketing AR-15s to college students in Huntington.
everytownresearch.org › guns-on-campus
Guns on Campus - Everytown Research
everytownresearch.org › guns-on-campus
1. Cached
Guns on Campus. The National Rifle Association (NRA) began its push to force colleges and universities to allow guns on campus following multiple high-profile campus shootings. The vast majority of states either prohibit guns on campus or else allow colleges to decide for themselves whether to allow guns on campus.3.
No, this bill would allow college students to carry guns on campus.
What do we know about college students? They have immature brains and lack impulse control and like to drink a lot. What could possibly go wrong?
In the first-place children need to know about sex to protect themselves from sexual predators usually from fellow religious cult members.
I don’t see that your website supports your point view. It uses no statistics and is only someone personal opinion. It ignores the 30 accidents with guns in schools that have already taken place. They are entitled to their opinion but you have to realize that is all it is, opinion.
This shooting demonstrates why mass murderers want to make sure they are armed with assault weapons.
This idiot bought a shot gun when he needed an AR-15. If he had an AR-15 firing at a 130 rounds a minute, like the Pulse Night Club shooter, there would have been 5 dead gun nuts. We don’t even know with the shooter had more than two rounds. It easy to shoot someone who is out of ammunition.
The Police department has yet to decide what to do with the gun nuts.
The investigation is not over. It came near being a tragedy because witnesses believed there was more than one shooter as did the other gun nut who went after their guns.
Soon there would have been many shooters shooting at each other. The police were there within a minute and a half and the gun nuts should have let the police do their job.
These will be mass shootings the FBI looked at and surely you must realize that mass shootings are also shootings while not all shootings are mass shooting all mass shootings are shootings also.
One of these big female gun nuts that advocates carrying guns was shot by her toddler with her own gun. The baby got into her bag in the back seat and shot her with it. That toddler knew what guns were for, killing people. More guns more deaths.
Even qualified psychologists disagree.
If they sell me a gun and claim it is an assault weapon and I find out it is not then I have been defrauded and entitled to my money back. If the gun manufacturers want to go that route, they will need to buy back 10 million non-assault weapons.
It is not necessary to fire 900 rounds a minute to massacre 50 people it took only 130 round a minute firing rate to kill 50 people.
The AR-15 is designed to fire at a 900 round a minute a rate you need only take advantage of the guns design.
We know for a fact a 130 round per minute rate can be achieved because the Pulse mass murderer was recorded firing at that rate.
You have to understand that there is a difference between firing 130 rounds in a minute or firing at a 130 round per minute rate.
A picture is better than a thousand words and those links that I posted show the AR-15 firing that fast.
You don’t pay attention to the definition you posted. Your definition said that murder was the killing of a human being “especially” one human being killing another. What are the other cases not specified in the definition? There is only one possibility where a human being is killed by a human being and that is suicide.
There was a third video that I posted that showed how easily an AR-15 could be modified to fire automatic.
There have been several mass shootings using modified assault weapons.
One guy pinned down the whole police department for several hours using an M-4. The mass shooting in California has several modified assault weapons.
There you go again making up your own definitions. In California a high capacity magazine is anything over 10. In Colorado any magazine over 15 is illegal. If they are illegal how can they possibly be standard, they are illegal for being high capacity magazines.
It is the automatics that fire at the 900 rounds per minute rate, so the bump-stock modified assault weapon show the actual capability of the assault weapon. The record for the semi-automatic Assault weapon is 130 rounds per minute rate which is plenty high enough to massacre fifty people in less then two minutes.
When there is a sound recording, all you need to do is slow it down and count the shots which is actually what they did.
You still don’t understand rate of fire versus total rounds fired.
You can drive down the road at 120 mph for a short distance but if you tried to drive that speed for a full hour the police would catch you.
It is the gun nut sites that have reported that figure. Your official figure will only count if it hits the bulls eye every time. That number is meaningless because many on that list did not identify the type of weapon used. It is the massacres that we need to put a stop to and there is only one solution and that is banning assault weapons.
To start the Colt was not the original designer or manufacturer AR-15 all Colt did was buy the patent. ArmaLite designed and sold the AR-15 between 1959-1964.
“Shall not be infringed” means you can’t take the gun rights from the mass murderers and criminals. There is a process to keep every right from being infringed it is called going to court.
You were given only an inch in the second amendment and think you are entitled to a thousand miles.
A right is a contract between government and the American people and you are only entitled under that contract to what is written and gun laws back that up. You can wish it were different but it will not change.
The point is guns will be designed to fire faster and faster and kill more and more people.
Think what a mass murderer could do if he mounted one of those guns that fired 6,000 rounds a minute in a van and went to a parade. Putting assault weapons on the streets is ridiculous.
2 million each would be a fair price for assault weapons that would be an effective ban.
I posted that how-to video right after the other to videos show how fast weapons of war fire. I t was so simple a first grader can do it. You are going to have to pay attention.
Why do you think people have always called them assault weapons? When did that change? Right after they banned them. Simple solution we’ll just call them a rifle. Nice try.
You cannot ignore the fact that most massacres are done with assault weapons.
There you go again making up your own definitions.
the bump-stock modified assault weapon show the actual capability of the assault weapon.
The record for the semi-automatic Assault weapon is 130 rounds per minute rate
130 rounds per minute rate which is plenty high enough to massacre fifty people in less then two minutes.
Your official figure will only count if it hits the bulls eye every time.
It is the massacres that we need to put a stop to and there is only one solution and that is banning assault weapons.
"Shall not be infringed" means you can't take the gun rights from the mass murderers and criminals. There is a process to keep every right from being infringed it is called going to court.
You were given only an inch in the second amendment and think you are entitled to a thousand miles.
A right is a contract between government and the American people and you are only entitled under that contract to what is written and gun laws back that up. You can wish it were different but it will not change.
The point is guns will be designed to fire faster and faster and kill more and more people.
Think what a mass murderer could do if he mounted one of those guns that fired 6,000 rounds a minute in a van and went to a parade.
Putting assault weapons on the streets is ridiculous.
2 million each would be a fair price for assault weapons that would be an effective ban.
I posted that how-to video right after the other to videos show how fast weapons of war fire. I t was so simple a first grader can do it. You are going to have to pay attention.
Why do you think people have always called them assault weapons?
When did that change? Right after they banned them. Simple solution we'll just call them a rifle. Nice try.
You cannot ignore the fact that most massacres are done with assault weapons.
There is a difference between being a whistle blower and a criminal that relays top secret information to the Russian showing our troop movements.
Obama was trying to stop people like Manning that was spying for the Russians.
Trump is trying to out people
who are showing that he is corrupt and working with foreign governments to cheat on the next election.
Manning did far more time in jail than Trump and we all know Trump should be in jail.
Manning was held in custody for 7 years the typical time served for murder.
The law is the law for most people but not for Trump.
There were many witnesses and documents that showed Trump's extorsion.
It is not necessary for every accuser to be confronted.
The whistleblower only sparked the investigation, he had no first hand information but the phone call. The phone call was made public that is the sum total of what the whistleblower knew.
Trump publicly admitted to extorsion.
Trump was not ever going to confront anyone because once Trump stated lying his ass off in court, he would be jailed for lying.
Trump was not in the least interested in investigating anything all he wanted was a news conference announcing an "investigating" he could care less whether they did anything he just needed them to announce it. It was a political publicity stunt plain and simple.
