No matter how many ways they come at you if you have not done anything wrong there is nothing they can do.
If I was guilty like Trump it would worry the hell out of me. That is why he is angry.
For any society to survive it has to have rules and no one can be above the law.
Unfortunately, there are many so called news sites which have no interest in the news, they are political propaganda sites and there only purpose is the spread of political propaganda.
There are very few reliable sources in America now but when you read a story the facts should be the same in every source.
No one who is innocent has anything to fear from an investigation.
Whistle blowers are protected by law and there have been many whistle blowers have been richly rewarded for their trouble.
No one on the left as threatened the major broadcasting companies with taking their license.
Trump is the first pathological liar to become president and he wants the news media to swear it is the god’s honest truth every time he lies to American people.
The “Heller decision” and that is at least the 10th time I have posted that.
It does not change the meaning of the statemen, “a right to keep and bear arms.
As long as you have an arm to bear that right has been met in full. You can have your militia armed with BB guns.
The armed right wing-nuts would overthrow the government every 20 years are so if they had access to enough armament. Like it or not the second amendment is as it is written and it is much too late to rewrite it.
Next time post a copy of the original Bill of Rights and it will show you are wrong, again.
I have absolutely no problem with granting the second amendment as it is written not imagined.
I charged people in court I know the difference.
When it says shall not be infringed that means that you can’t take someone planning a mass murderer’s AR-15 until after the massacre.
I have no problem with the second amendment as long as it is enforced as written.
Do you know who makes the laws?
The definition is the correct definition. It is ludicrous to believe that two identical assault weapons that one is assault weapon and the other is not because one has an option and the other does not.
In many mass shootings no one is even killed but massacres kill up to 59 and wound over 500 it is a completely different problem.
That is a lie and you know it, there are over 40,000 deaths caused by guns each year. That is the highest amount of people killed by guns in 38 years.
That is the highest amount of people killed by guns in 38 years.
This evening they ran a story of a vet with PSD who used M-16 in a mass shooting.
Since the incident was filmed you hear the automatic gun fire as it completely riddled the vet’s apartment with holes and held off police for hours.
I thought you said they could not get an M-16 from the army.
These automatics are out there and the converted AR-15s.
I watched another story where they took converted assault weapons. There is no fantasy to it you might ask the cops who had to find away to stop a gun nut with an M-16
They don’t need a study to see that deaths caused by guns is at a 38-year high all they need do is count the bodies.
In New Zeeland it only took one massacre of 50 people and in days assault weapons were banned.
Unlike the CDC study we have actual dead bodies to count so there is no doubt.
The army uses those weapons of war for a reason they were designed to fight wars with not be on the streets.
Abortion would have to be prohibited in the constitution which it is not.
The constitution does not list all the things you can do.
You notice the difference in gun rights which were limited to an arm to bear.
Abortion rights were not limited by the constitution unlike gun rights.
Then you will agree that you do not have a right to any weapon whatsoever for any reason whatsoever since that is how the supreme court ruled.
The Harvard study shows that 79% of Americans no longer own a gun.
The Heller decision shows you the direction gun control is headed and it will be the foundation of a thousand gun control laws.
Timothy McVeigh was a life long member of the NRA who believes that if the government does something you do not like that you should overthrow the government.
That is not far for your justification for having weapons of war on the streets if the government does something you don’t like you need those weapons of war to overthrow the government.
If someone is mentally ill, they act alone but in this case both Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nickols were both convicted for the Oklahoma City bombing. Timothy McVeigh was not mentally ill he was brain washed by the NRA into believing if you didn’t like what the government did then you were entitled to overthrow the government.
McVeigh and Nickols were designated as domestic terrorist. Your mind set is far closer to McVeigh than you realize because it has the same source, the teaching of the NRA.
You can’t get around the 168 dead bodies in Oklahoma City bombing and the NRA justification for filling the streets with assault weapons to overthrow the government just in case they don’t like what the government is doing. The mind set is the same and the Oklahoma City bombing grew out of that mind set.
You have used that justification for citizens owning weapons of war over and over again and the NRA does the same.
A right to keep and bear arms was never intended to be a license to overthrow the government.
What do you think terrorist are trying to do? Their intent is to overthrow the government they don’t like.
The right-wing hate groups have more than doubled during Trump’s term in office.
Just this week there was another attack on Jews in New Jersey and I looked for Trump to say they were fine people on both sides like he did of the Virginia killing by terrorists.
The KKK and the Neo Nazis are Trumps most loyal supporters.
The facts say otherwise and he is a racist bigot.
There were 22 killed in El Paso by a Trump quoting mass murderer how many were killed at the ICE demonstrations?
None. I thought so. They showed people lying in the floor dying of the flue and nothing was done. There have been several children die at those camps
They showed people lying in the floor dying of the flue and nothing was done.
Trump has done that several times. At one of hiss rallies in Florida he egged the crowd on as they decided the solution to the illegal alien would be the same as Hitler ultimate solution for the Jews.
“People are Angry President Trump Used this Word to Describe Undocumented Aliens.”
Time
If a gun is laying around children are going to find it and it has already happened in at least one school. If people can leave a baby in their car all day, they can sure leave their gun laying around. Sorry that is a fact it has already happened just because you can’t imagine it happening doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
I would say most murders are done because someone was angry. For you to believe the same principal does not apply to teachers is absurd. The real world does not end when you enter a school the same principals still apply.
If I was you, I would search for any article to get as much information from other sources as possible.
I always check your sources because they are questionable and probably being posted by the Russians.
A gun is something someone grabs in anger and there were very few of my teachers who were immune from anger.
In just two massacres a 109 people were killed and there are massacres happening frequently now.
There is something wrong with that 297 figure because there were probably 20,000 suicides with long guns. Assault weapons have been defined under the law and selective fire switch has nothing to do with it.
Mass shootings are defined in one way and that is a shooting where four or more people are killed or wounded.
I think you meant to say that most questions can be shaped to get a specific answer, like "Do you think we should have background checks?" The majority would say yes, they would also more than likely not know that background checks are already federal law. This type of answer would then be used by the anti-gun left to push for background checks, which already exist. Lately it's the push to get laws passed that don't allow spousal abusers to not have guns. The problem, this law already exists in federal law.
Quote:I think that map would be like the child molester’s map and would tip parents off who do not want their children in houses where they might be accidently shot.
You live in a fantasy world of gun violence to the extreme.
Quote:Again, that is a case of wishful reading on your part.
Wrong again, its wishful thinking on your side. His complete remarks, not filtered by the anti-Trump media:
Quote:Here's a more complete quote:
"You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the White nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and White nationalists. Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group."
Quote:It has been the rich land owners and people like Trump that caused the illegal immigration problem. Without those illegal aliens Americans would starve top death because the crops would root in the fields without millions of illegals aliens to pick the crops. Are you going to take a job picking crops for 50 cents an hour? This is nothing more than white racism the KKK could never do better in the old south it was the blacks who were going to take over.
We have the technology to pick those crops without the use of human hands. In fact very few crops can't be picked by machines. I'd rather pay more for my fruits and vegetables than have millions of illegal immigrants in the country. I'm all for prosecuting the business owners just as much as the people who cross the border illegally, neither one of them is in the right.
Quote:When someone is being followed at night there is really only one motive.
You are projecting again.
Quote:Zimmerman is a known criminal and he is not going to do what the police department tells him to do.
He isn't a known criminal, if he was, he wouldn't be allowed to legally own a gun. The Obama DOJ investigated him and found no problems with the case, they cleared him and gave him back his gun. You have no legs to stand on.
Quote:It is never a recommendation from the police department they don’t do suggestions they give orders. The order is for your own good as Zimmerman soon found out.
Sorry to tell you, a police dispatcher has zero law enforcement powers, they are not cops and they are not the police, they are civilians.
Quote:It is never a recommendation from the police department they don’t do suggestions they give orders. The order is for your own good as Zimmerman soon found out.
Thirty-thee states now have some form of a stand your ground law but the law has inspired so many killings that now ten states have introduced laws to repeal the stand your ground laws.
But do you know who will be in the state houses stuffing the politician’ pockets with cash? The gun manufactures, stand your ground laws are very good for business.
At least 30 people are killed each month as a result of stand your ground laws.
No projecting necessary. In NASCAR they don’t call it cheating just a very close reading of the rules. In a close reading of the Stand your ground laws make it is very obvious that all one needs do is start a fight, then take your gun out of your pocket and kill them. The perfect murder done in public in front of a hundred witnesses and there is nothing anyone can do.
You have no clue as to what projections is.
It is a good thing that 79% of Americans don’t own a gun.
Zimmerman had been repeatedly told by police department and the Homer owners association “not to follow people.”
It is a matter of record.
Source: Democrats Pick Up Most House Seats in a Generation”: NPR
“Donald Trump wants to Eliminate Income Taxes for 31 million Americans”
Under the Trump plan a married couple first $50,000 would be tax exempt. This lie is how he got elected but the sad part is gullible think they got that tax cut.
It makes no difference if they were married to Kermit the Frog, Fusion GPS was working for the Republicans when the report was written an only after the primary sold the information to the Democrats
The report was written by the DNC and Clinton buddies.
You are just cherry picking the statistics.
There are far more people killed with long guns.
To start with accidental shooting are ignored. Hunting accidents, which involve long guns, killed 486 people in 2017.
Doris Lin
Updated November 26, 2019
According to the International Hunter Education Association, in an average year, fewer than 1,000 people in the United States and Canada are accidentally shot by hunters, and of these, fewer than 75 are fatalities. In many cases, these fatalities are self-inflicted by hunters who trip, fall, or have other accidents that cause them to shoot themselves with their own weapons. Most of the other fatalities come in hunting parties, where one hunter shoots another accidentally.
Long guns are also a popular way to commit suicide, which is the murder of a human being.
To you even 297 people is an acceptable cost to play with an assault weapon. If a whole class room of first graders is killed so what, you just want to play with a gun.
In England and Wales only 3% of homicides are done with guns while in America 73% of homicides are done with guns.
New Zealand had a major massacre killing 50 people. They banned assault weapons in a matter of day and that put an end to massacres in New Zealand. See how simple that is. In fact, New Zealand banned most semi-automatic weapons.
The gun manufacturers and the NRA have been spreading pointless death for years.
That is a comprehensive study done by the FBI. What more could you want?
Baby Bush could have prevented 9/11 but he was too busy vacationing on his ranch to even talk to Nation Security advisor. It was known that al Qaeda had already done a dry run with an airplane in Italy but baby Bush had no time to listen.
The problem with assault weapons is not that you cannot overthrow the government with them but that they make massacres possible.
If they are rights they cannot be read as a restriction on government that is just the shadow not the substance.
Do you not understand that the constitution can be changed and the bill of rights is part of that constitution? In fact, we have changed that constitution in the past by adding amendments. If we can add we can take away.
Does someone that has been admitted to a mental institution get due process?
No. The criminal is convicted of a felony but there is no due process on the question of owning a gun. If the second amendment can’t be infringed then it can’t be infringed for any reason. There is nothing in the amendment that stipulates how to go about stripping a person of their gun rights it simply says cannot be infringed.
Who wrote the bill of rights? The government.
That is exactly what I said. Did you read your source? The final version of the Declaration of Independence “unalienable.” The final version, which is the Declaration of Independence use unalienable. There was no doubt many other words that they considered throughout the Declaration of Independence but the final version only uses one.
The point being that “all rights” have their limit, there is no such thing as an absolute right whether it is second amendment or the fourteenth amendment. The supreme court is the one that stated the fourteenth amendment gave us a right to privacy but even that right has limits it seems
A world Series is a national crowd not an area crowd they come from all over the country and will be representative of the electorate in the next election.
Clinton gave all the emails to the FBI to start with and the FBI sorted them and gave Clinton back her personal emails then she was free to do whatever she wanted with her personal emails just as you can.
The FBI agent that ran the investigation related the actual facts of the case. After Clinton was given her personal emails back the Republicans wanted them to mine them for personal information to use in the upcoming election. You live in such a distorted world when live on radical right information, it is a world where the lies are truth and the truth are lies. You would whether hear a good lie than the truth any day. Is it illegal to delete your personal emails?
There were several Russian attacks on the DNC email accounts including the one that came 30 minutes after Trump publicly promised the Russian they would be richly rewarded if they found Clinton’s missing emails.
When the FBI first made contact with the DNC about the Russian military break in into the server, they contacted a low-level employ with no authority.
The second FBI contact came somewhat later with a higher-level employee. To open up the DNC server to the FBI before an election would release all their strategy for the upcoming election which would be sure to find it’s way to the RNC you can bet.
It is called the carried interest loophole and was especially written just for people like Romney.
You do understand what a loophole is don’t you?
If you don’t like the rules and you have enough money to bribe enough politicians the sky is the limit. I have fifty years of tax returns that say that 47% is nothing more than another republican lie. There was not one year where I didn’t pay income tax, not even when I earned $6,000 a year. They have revised the Romney lie it was 50% didn’t pay income tax, a tax levied only on “excess wealth” but now excess wealth is the one thing that is least likely to be taxed.
Even criminals have the right to defend themselves and we know they do because they are the most likely ones to get shot and that is a daily occurrence. That is because someone is always coming after them.
If you are robbing someone, by taking his drugs you mean. Those guys had a score to settle. If they were there to rob him all they need do was hold them at gun point but that was not what they were there for. If they had wanted to kill him, they had guns. They had another reason to be there.
It is not about gun owners but I suspect far more criminals, own guns than the general population.
The test is if you feel someone stole the birthday gift that is your reality.
If you were a businessman and stood to lose several of your regular customers because you had somebody that backed up all of a psychopathic liar’s lies in public in your place of business, what would you do? The interesting thing about freedom speech is that it is between the government and citizens not between businesses owners and customers. If you say something in a place of business that the owner doesn’t like he can show you the door. He did not grant you freedom of speech and it is not binding on him in his place of business.
Is it illegal to delete your personal emails?
It looks like the Dayton shooter had a last-minute conversion following the El Paso massacre and posting likes to white supremacist’s postings after the El Paso massacre that is when he decides to massacre people. People’s political beliefs can change on a New York minute. That was what was on his mind before the shooting.
They always say follow the money and now millions of school dollars are being spent to harden schools, pay for massacre drills, and armed security guards. When children have to go to school and worry that some gun nut is going to use them for target practice it is the perfect recipe for Traumatic Stress Disorder.
The Declaration of Independence was written for benefit of the King of England to state the reasons for withdrawing from the English Empire.
The problem is who is going to decide when the government “becomes destructive to these ends.” Timothy McVeigh made his decision that the government had “becomes destructive to those means” and he paid with his life and 184 others.
Do the Republicans get to decide that the government has “become destructive to those means?” Or do the democrats decide? The Neo-Nazis? The KKK? Or do we have an election where 2/3 have to decide? That question would seem to preclude that from ever being anything but a fantasy for anyone except the Timothy McVeigh type.
The constitution has been changed in the last century so we know that can happen and all rights have limits there are no absolute rights.
It went much further than Martin Luther. Christianity shattered like a mirror dropped from a ten-story building. Very few churches don’t get into a fight over the interpretation of scripture and sperate into new churches.
Organized religious are no more than religious cults but they fail to recognize that but they will always say that other church up the street is just a religious cult. They can clearly see the competition but when the mirror is held up to their face, they don’t see it.
The Federalist Papers are basically the guest editorials arguing pro and cons of the various proposals for the constitution. Who do you think wrote the constitution? The founding fathers.
The Neo-Nazis were a fringe group until Trump was elected and they were part of the coalition that elected him.
Most political candidates return the political contributions from hate groups, not Trump. To Trump a vote is vote no matter where it comes from.
If the president is glad to get the endorsement of the former Grand Wizard of the KKK then they must be fine people.
The founding fathers built a mechanism into the constitution so that it could be changed by the people as the conditions change.
Saturday Night Live got it right when they highlighted that in the next election there is no reason at all for 97% of Americans to bother to vote in the presidential election, the election will be decided in three small battle ground states.
When 97% of the electorate vote is meaningless it discourages anyone from bothering. And the Republicans have been busy in those states stripping 234,000 of mostly democratic voters of the right to vote. When you can cut the cut the contest down top three states, cheating becomes very much easier.
The electoral college was designed to give the slave states more power in the elections.
We have already had two fraudulent Republican presidents and unless the antiquated system is changed
, we will see more but the first time a democratic president wins with a minority of the vote the Republicans will go through the roof and call for a retroactive change.
Whenever you have an illegitimate president you are going to have problems.
When the majority of the country voted against the president there will always be problems.
.The way the electoral college setup is as if we were 50 separate countries and each country holds its own isolated election. We are either one nation or we are not
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
It is the fault of system designed to serve a world that no longer exists.
What would be the best way to solve your problem? Elect the president by popular vote that way your vote counts the same as everyone else. In the next election 3% of the population will decide who is elected president.
The principal America was built on was one man one vote, or majority rule.
You see that at work in the congress, local and state elections even every other election for federal office.
The two-party system we could decide the presidential election by popular vote and still have a two-party system.
You might have some credibility if assault weapons did not look exactly alike with all the same parts with the exception of three tiny parts.
The only difference those three tiny parts make is it is an automatic assault weapon. All the superior capabilities of assault weapon but one.
Any time a law is written they use experts in that field and you can bet any time a gun control law is written the gun manufactures are there for their input.
If the gun manufactures thought they could have overturned the 1994 assault weapon ban they would have filed suit. They have an army of lawyers so why didn’t they file suit? Smart lawyers always know how a case will come out before they file. They knew that if they lost in the supreme court assault weapon bans would be legal in all 50 states. That is what happened when they took the Heller case court. That decision makes assault weapon bans legal.
