@Zardoz,
Quote:At this point you are like most republicans, “hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.”
We don't see guns as evil, people are evil. inanimate objects have no desire or ambitions and can't be evil. People are the issue, not the guns. Millions of people own guns and if they were as violent as you claim they are, we would have a yearly death toll well above where it currently sits, at about 11000-13000 per year.
Quote:On the evening news they reported about an FBI study of 41 school shootings in the last ten years but you don’t see that as a problem that is crying out for a solution.
As usual, I did a search for the claim you made and I can't find it on Google. 41 school shootings years? That is actually way lower than the #'s given over the last couple of years. Last year by mid-year they tried to claim that there were over 200 school shootings... this is why you can't trust the numbers released by anti-gun groups, they just make it up to fit their propaganda.
Quote:Not only that you want to throw road blocks to stop the obvious solution. “If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem.”
Road blocks to protect my Constitutional Right. We should have learned our lesson after 9-11, we don't give up our Rights because bad things happen.
Quote:Guns take ten times as many lives as they save.
No they don't. The 2013 CDC study disproves this claim. 500,000 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses per year. Even at the low number, it is magnitudes more people saved then killed with guns in crimes. Considering there are only about 12k murders per year, you would be wrong.
Quote:If the guy was beating her husband all she needed was a base ball bat and he would not been beating anyone.
She was 8 months pregnant and there were 2 guys, and both the dudes had guns. The Ar15 was the great equalizer for this couple. Based on your wants, they would both had been dead along with their unborn baby.
Quote:A hand gun would have stopped the intruder because he was distracted beating her husband.
There were 2 people who invaded their home, both were armed with handguns.
Quote:He could not beat her husband and hold a gun.
I guess you have never heard of the term "pistol whipped." You can beat someone with a gun in your hand, you beat them with the gun. You just can't get any of this right can you.
Quote:What she didn’t need was a gun capable of slaughtering 50 people. Usually people armed like that sell drugs for a living.
You actually have zero right to decide what that family uses for self-defense. 2 armed men were beating her husband, she was 8 months pregnant and you wanted her to try and stop 2 men with a baseball bat? You have more respect for the lives of crooks then you do for innocent civilians.
Quote:Usually people armed like that sell drugs for a living.
You made this same claim about the guy who defended his home with an AR15 when 3 armed men broke into his house. You sure like to brand law biding citizens as drug dealers. He wasn't a drug dealer and he was cleared of all crimes. I'd say you should feel ashamed of yourself, but liberals feel no shame.
Quote:You are still basing your black is white and white is black argument on one lame court decision.
Lame court decision could apply to all SC rulings you don't like.
Quote:If the founding fathers had intended the bill of rights to be a bill of restrictions on the government, they would have named it the bill of restrictions.
No, they named it correctly. It was to spell out the Rights of Citizens and the restrictions on the govt. You have utter failed to understand what Liberty and Freedom really are and what the purpose of govt is. It's biggest purpose is to protect the Rights of the individual, not place restrictions on what they can do, that isn't freedom or liberty.
Quote:A right to privacy is something granted to a citizen.
Rights are not granted, they already exist. What the govt grants it can take away, that isn't liberty or freedom.
Quote:Would the government be prevented from doing the census?
The Census is actually listed in the Constitution as something the govt has to do. It's original purpose was to determine how many Reps a given state would receive.
Quote:We all know who was responsible for the lock up chants to start with.
Well it wasn't Trump. It was actually a guy named Michael Stoker.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-hillary-clinton-michael-stoker-epa-lock-her-up-chant-a8362566.html
Quote:Trump used them to cheat his way into the Whitehouse.
He didn't cheat his way into the WH, he won fair and square. If the left looses, they always think someone cheated.
Quote:Free speech has limits and they are trying to stop lying to win an election.
Sorry to tell you, but lying is part of free speech, as long as you aren't lying to the FBI or other LEO investigators. Democrats stand in Congress and lie to the American people everyday. They even lie to win elections, as pointed out by Harry Reid when he was confronted by a news reporter about lying about Romney's taxes. His response to the reporter? "It worked didn't it." So save your claims about lies for someone else, the left has no moral ground to stand on, actually neither party has a moral leg to stand on, they all lie. It's part of being a politician.
Quote:The Republicans posted that the election was on Nov 5 when in fact it was on the Nov 4 to suppress voter turnout in certain communities.
Do you have any proof of this claim?
Quote:Since social media can be used to selectively bombard specific voters with false information many social media sites are just refusing all political adds.
The only one I know about so far is Twitter. No other social media sites have said they will block political advertisements.
Quote:Other right-wing nut jobs, like Trumps good buddy, posting that no children were killed at Sandy Hook that it was done with actors got himself banned.
Alex Jones was a Trump supporter, but they are not friends.
Quote:This is Putin method to create an alternate universe of lies so no one will know what the truth is. Trying to intimidate political candidates by death threats is a popular political game. I came to work one morning and the mayor’s car was in the grease bay with the bomb squad going over it with a fine- tooth comb. Threats are a crime and the law should be enforced. If someone threatens a congressman or his family that is not free speech.
Quote:This is Putin method to create an alternate universe of lies so no one will know what the truth is.
You mean like Harry Reid standing on the floor of the Senate and lying about Romney's taxes? The MSM spreading the fake story about the Russian pee tapes? Those types of lies?
Quote: Trying to intimidate political candidates by death threats is a popular political game.
You mean like a Bernie supporter showing up at the Congressional Baseball practice and shooting at several members of congress? How about Rand Pauls neighbor who attacked him and broke several of his ribs? How about Right of center people going to restaurants and being harassed and yelled at until they left a restaurant?
Quote:Threats are a crime and the law should be enforced. If someone threatens a congressman or his family that is not free speech.
Except that female politician wasn't talking about threats, she was talking about people being critical of them or making fun of them. Nothing close to what you just claimed.
Quote:At this point it is hard to get two people to agree on anything let alone millions.
That just isn't the case, plenty of people agree on things. You are talking about political opposites, and that is where it is hard to get agreement. The DNC and the GOP general don't agree on anything, but you can bet a majority of the people in those groups agree on things.
Quote:So, you believe the government should be violently overthrown by right wing nuts.
That isn't even close to what I said. I said we have the right to overthrow the govt, that was the primary reason for the 2nd Amendment. Once again, read the Federalist and anti-Federalist papers for a better understanding of the 2nd Amendment.
Quote:Iraq was bombed back to stone age and Iraq had far more than a 100- times the casualties we suffered.
It doesn't change the fact that the left was screaming at the top of their lungs to get our guys out of those countries so that no more of our soldiers died.
Quote:What we are left from the founding father is the actual writing it is a nice history lesson to find out what their intensions were but the actual writing prevails.
You can't remove the intentions from the actual writing, they are one in the same and work together.
Quote:We already have another way to remove a tyrannical government it is called voting them out.
If they are truly tyrannical, ballots won't make them leave, force will be required, that's where the 2nd Amendment comes in. It's also why the left doesn't like the 2nd Amendment, they know it is their ideology that would lead to tyranny in this country. If you really thought it was the right wing that would do this, you would support the 2nd Amendment.
Quote:Then the converted semi-automatics used in the North Hollywood shootout were assault weapons but the day before they were converted, they were just a regular semi-automatic rifle.
Well, they still wouldn't be assault rifles, they still don't have a selective fire switch. They are illegally converted semi-auto rifles, not "assault rifles." Assault is actually an action, so they would be better called "defensive rifles". Just like they are called for LEO and other federal agencies.
Quote:The full-automatic assault weapon does not require the trigger to be pulled each time, one pull of trigger will fire the entire magazine. It loads automatically and it fires automatically. The semi-automatic version loads automatically also.
Why are you repeating what I said? Is it an attempt to be correct about guns for once?
Quote:The death toll is terrible but the children that were wounded and survive will have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and even those who come to school everyday wondering whether this will be the day a mass murder shows up with an assault weapon will be scared for life.
I feel bad for those kids, but I'm not giving up my Rights for their feelings. That isn't how our Constitution works.
Quote:We all realize that gun nuts are inviting trouble into their lives. “you live with a gun you die by the gun but the rest of us do not want to invite the additional risk into our lives.
Gun nuts? You mean people who like guns and know more about them than you do? If you don't want the additional risk in your life, then don't buy a gun. Me owning a gun does nothing to put your life in danger, unless you had plans to assault me. By the way, the probability study you are referring to is bogus and doesn't represent the actual facts and stats about guns. It was a scare tactic and nothing more.
Quote:The gun nuts are always going to shoot each other as long as there are guns but the massacres are another matter. They require assault weapons.
How many times do you have to be wrong? Gun owners aren't running around shooting each other. You want to confuse the drug dealers and gang-bangers with the average gun owner. The stats and facts don't agree with your propaganda.
Quote:There have been 41 school shooting in the last ten years according to the FBI. How many other massacres have taken place at all other locations?
I did a search for this claim and can't find any news story backing your claim. What channel did you watch this on? Are you going to claim again that not all stories on the TV make it to the internet? You would be lying again. The sites make money off of people visiting their webpages, the story will be there, just provide some info so the story can be found.
Quote:Since the only requirement to mass shooting is that four or more people be shot how do you figure a domestic dispute where four people are shot is not a mass shooting.
That is not the only requirement for a mass shooting. Family murders are not mass shootings, mass shootings generally take place in public spaces and usually don't have another crime in connection with them. You are trying to use the most basic and generic definition of what a mass shooting is. The only reason for this is to make "mass shootings" seem more frequent than they really are, this is the very definition of propaganda.
Quote:prop·a·gan·da
/ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
Quote:Murder is simply the killing of a human being whether you like it or not.
No, as you pointed out yesterday, it is the killing of another human being. Suicide isn't murder.
Quote:You would have a bunch kids with immature brains and no impulse control running around with guns.
This is the second time you have told this lie. No one has said arm kids, we have said train the adults and arm them to protect their students. Why do you keep lying about what is actually said?
Quote:Your source only cited the school massacres done in 2018 not the top ten massacres.
You never mentioned the top 10 until todays post. What source of mine are you talking about? This is where it would be nice of you to actually quote what you are talking about.
Quote:My figure was not just school shootings it was the top ten highest body count massacres. All you have to is a search for the top ten mass murders and it will show you that assault weapons are made for massacres.
Once again, you have never mentioned the "top 10", that's something you started last night. Till this point, you have only mentioned Las Vegas, Sandyhook, Pulse and Columbine.
Quote:The killing of a human being is the killing of a human being. To be sure suicides are a subset of murders just as those killed with guns would be another subset but they are all murders.
No, suicide is not a subset of murder. Stop trying to change the meanings of words to fit your propaganda.
Quote:Again, you can have a subset but the bank robbery was one thing the shoot out was another.
They are the same thing, they robbed a bank and then tried to escape, the shootout was due to their attempted escape, which failed.
Quote:I gave you the direct quote from the Wikipedia article that said they had several converted assault weapons that were full-automatic. Read it and weep.
I never disputed that they had converted rifles, I dispute your claim that this was a mass shooting, it was a bank robbery.
Quote:Columbine did take place in 1999 but only the sale of assault weapons was banned the ones already out there were not confiscated.
True, but this actually has nothing to do with the Columbine shooting.
Quote:Thus, it was an easy matter for the Columbine shooters to get their dads assault weapons. Gun violence may have been down but massacres went up.
You make up so much **** and try to push it as truth. They didn't take anything from their dad's, they went and bought their own guns.
Quote:Gun violence may have been down but massacres went up.
Massacres went up during the assault weapons ban? How can that be, the weapons were banned...
Quote:The increase in massacres is traceable back to the expiration of the assault weapon ban.
No it isn't, that's the anti-gun propaganda talking.
Quote:On the all-time high list 3 of the top 5 of the highest body count massacres occurred in the last three years. The deadliest massacre 10 years ago left just 16 dead.
You keep coming up with different size lists... why is that?