@gungasnake,
Well gunga--that's quite plausible I suppose until you consider that sin was defined as anything which didn't help the powerful to continue living in the style they were dynamically accustoming themselves to live in and to prevent any interference with the continuation.
Obviously, to say that there was no such thing as sin was the greatest of all sins. But it might be an even greater sin to conspire to encourage the avidity of the desire for outward significations of being in proud possession of superior genetic material to the extent that the whole project turns into a gamble betting to beat the house with a desperate double or quits strategy which sometimes works but has high impact if it doesn't.
It's hard to judge whether it's a flaw or not.