@High Seas,
Quote:Frank - you know I always like to read you, but this thread has over 100,000 views and it's a safe bet most of those lookups are due to its title, not because readers are too young to have heard of the birds and the bees. Why not go to the evolution thread where Spendius is already involved in a sex ed argument?
But HS, it has become an aspect of the debate about the Repub. nomination. It is as valid a subject for this thread as the tax policies or foreign policies of the candidates are.
revelette's slice of Mr Santorum's address makes that sufficiently clear. He is bidding for that section of voters who generally agree with that speech.
I am attempting to draw a distinction between a society without contraception and one with it and encouraged by government subsidy. The cultural tone of either. Such subsidy might be seen as being similar to the One Child policy in China.
Mr Obama deliberately opened the debate and the candidates for the nomination have responded. Mr Santorum taking the lead. What could be more on topic? Especially when few of us understand the details of tax or foreign policy.
I'm trying to colour in the spaces in Mr Santorum's stance and consider whether he is right to think it will carry him to the White House.
Despite being Emperor and offering financial inducements and promotions, Augustus could not get the Roman citizens to produce the required number of children. And I hardly suppose anybody thinks that they didn't engage in the jollies so often.