@revelette,
revelette wrote:
Quote:Im sure not everyone that opposes it is a bigot or a racist.
perhaps, however if you are sure then you must know of other reasons other than collective guilt of all muslims for the actions of a few.
I do not think many people blame all Muslims for the actions of a few. However, in my opinion, if there are a "few" that are radicalized, within the Muslim faith, to do acts of terrorism, then how do the "western nations" address terrorism that can use mosques as meeting places of radicalized Muslims?
Like when city ordinances were passed that people should not congregate on street corners, since some juvenile delinquents may have had a penchant to meet/hang out on street corners before they did whatever juvenile delinquents did that was against the law. Now, all young people that wanted to stand on a corner were not juvenile delinquents. Some might have just wanted to watch people go by? However, the many did have their right to stand on a street corner curtailed, due to the actions of a few. And, it made sense, since the common good was protected.
Perhaps, in the minds of some, a mosque functions beyond a house of worship, in an age when radicalized Islam is perceived by some as being in some struggle against the west (aka, jihad). Perhaps, this struggle against the west is a reality, and not the plot of some "B" grade movie? Hmmm? Was 9/11 just a dream?
By the way, in the 1950's when hanging out on street corners became unlawful in some locales, the respective group of juvenile delinquents did consider specific street corners to be their "turf," and took pride in perceived ownership of that street corner. So, in dealing with radicalized Islam that denigrates women's rights, and some of the males seem to have a pack mentality like middle-school boys, it is not inconceivable that a specific mosque, may in their eyes (only) function like a "trophy street-corner" representing (to them) the victory over some specific turf won?
The analogy might be correct, since in my opinion, much of the adversarial interaction between Christian/Hindu/Jew and radicalized Islam, around the world, seems to just be based on radicalized Islam having the proverbial "turf war" of inner city youth. Maybe the mosque at Ground Zero should better become a Moslem Head Start Center, so the next generation of Muslims in NYC not be so alienated from the surrounding dominant cultures?
I know, I know. The retorts of posters will point out that the anti-mosque folks are the "alienated ones." Alienated perhaps, but not radicalized. I have never heard of New Yorkers wanting to "struggle" against the Moslem world. There is not even a term in Christianity, I believe, for a struggle against Islam. And, do not say "Crusade," since something that happened 1,000 years ago, is not a valid EXCUSE for 9/11.