46
   

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Aug, 2010 03:39 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cyclo, or FART, or TKO, or whoever u r,
your post is fraught with CONFUSION
and non-sequiturs

I hope that u r a better engineer
than a poster; an engineer is required to be LOGICAL.



David wrote:
I 've abandoned it. I have no fear.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
This is clearly untrue, or else you wouldn't softly stroke your guns
and whisper to them how much you love them all the time.
That is a non-sequitur. Your conclusion does not follow; it makes no sense.
I love my guns as I love my gold coin collection, as I love my 7 foot HDTV, as I love my cars,
as I love my favorite restaurants, as I love my real estate,
as I love to travel etc, etc, and none
of those loves is based upon FEAR, either.
Fear is NOT a condition precedent to LOVE.

I also love A2K; there is no fear involved in that, as u have implied.

My guns are not only functional emergency defenses;
I have also chosen them as works of beauty.
I have been accosted at gunnery ranges several times by people,
including the police, who have commended me upon their beauty. Some have historic value
(e.g., my 9mm Luger P-'08 from 1940 with matching serial numbers on all numbered parts)
in addition to being fully functional. I don 't stroke them; I cock them (revolvers) and uncock them, while watching TV
(not the loaded ones).

Cycloptichorn wrote:
If you have no fear, then you don't need a weapon,
because you have no fear of what would happen if you didn't have one. Right?
RONG, and your circular reasoning
is not bright; whether I need a defensive weapon
has NOTHING to do with my emotions. It has to do with whether
depredations are initiated upon my person or property (as has already happened).

When u say:
"If you have no fear, then you don't need a weapon"
that implies (foolishly) that a fearless condition
keeps away violent criminals; that 's nonsense; prove it. GO AHEAD; prove it.

If I do not fear getting a flat tire, will I then be immune from flats ??


If a man has no fear of heart attack, will he be immune therefrom?
If a man has no fear of unemployment, does he then have perfect job security??







David wrote:
If the Moslems prevail in giving us the finger
with this World Trade Center mosque, I 'll have a low opinion of it.
I'll understand it to be an expression of the Moslems' enmity and contempt,
but I 'll not respond with emotion; wasteful n futile.
Cycloptichorn wrote:
And Bigotry is not?
Is not WHAT??



Cycloptichorn wrote:
Hate is not wasteful and futile?
I made the point that it IS wasteful.



Cycloptichorn wrote:
The only person 'getting the finger' is you,
David
That is nonsense, TKO. The Moslems do not know
of my existence
, but thay certainly know of the existence of NY and of America,
toward whom the finger is directed. "The Great Satan" thay call us; not ME, particularly.




Cycloptichorn wrote:
because you have created a boogeyman,
who you now hate and fear. It's entirely within you.

Cycloptichorn
MORE NONSENSE from Cyclo, or whoever he is.
Creating a false man, does not result in your getting the finger.
If u make a false man, there is no need to hate nor to fear your creation, DESPITE what F'ART claims.





David
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Tue 31 Aug, 2010 04:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
your post is fraught with CONFUSION


I have to agree with you on this one, Om. His, I mean his, no wait, it was his was a study in confusion. Yours, man oh man ... the words simply fail me.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  3  
Reply Tue 31 Aug, 2010 04:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
RONG, and your circular reasoning
is not bright; whether I need a defensive weapon
has NOTHING to do with my emotions. It has to do with whether
depredations are initiated upon my person or property (as has already happened).


But you don't care if they do said depredations, right? You have no fear at all of such a condition. Right?

This is a roundabout way of saying that you're full of ****, David. You do have fear, and it's evident in your choice of hobby - and your choice of bigotry.

Quote:

When u say:
"If you have no fear, then you don't need a weapon"
that implies (foolishly) that a fearless condition
keeps away violent criminals; that 's nonsense; prove it. GO AHEAD; prove it.


It doesn't imply that at all. You are making a logical error here.

Quote:
If I do not fear getting a flat tire, will I then be immune from flats ??


No, but you won't care if you get them.

Quote:
If a man has no fear of heart attack, will he be immune therefrom?
If a man has no fear of unemployment, does he then have perfect job security??


No, but you won't care if you have a heart attack. You won't care if you lose your job, because you do not fear those outcomes.

You don't even know what the word Fear means, do you?

Quote:
Quote:
Hate is not wasteful and futile?


I made the point that it IS wasteful.


Then why do you engage in wasteful behaviors?

Quote:
Creating a false man, does not result in your getting the finger.
If u make a false man, there is no need to hate nor to fear your creation, DESPITE what F'ART claims.


You created the false man inside your head who is flipping YOURSELF off. You have created both the boogeyman and your response to it, riling yourself up in the name of hate and fear. It is entirely internal and entirely unrelated to reality.

Cycloptichorn
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Tue 31 Aug, 2010 06:54 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:


Fish was particularly offensive, equating a guy with help blowing up a building and killing scores with one guy stabbing another with a knife. Both in degree of wrong and degree of unusualness these two events are not similar.

Fish's argument is unpersuasive because those who object to a planned major public space are not going to feel any responsibility or any guilt about a guy stabbing a cap driver. Nor should they. One act is exercising a constitutional right,it is a demonstration of why America was created. The other is common crime.


You don't get it and will probably never get it.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 02:22 am
@Cycloptichorn,
Quote:
RONG, and your circular reasoning
is not bright; whether I need a defensive weapon
has NOTHING to do with my emotions. It has to do with whether
depredations are initiated upon my person or property (as has already happened).


Cycloptichorn wrote:

But you don't care if they do said depredations, right?
You have no fear at all of such a condition. Right?
U stupidly imply that caring must be based upon fear.
Thay r 2 distinct concepts; u shoud know that.

I do not "FEAR" getting a flat tire; I 'd certainly care if it happened.



Cycloptichorn wrote:
This is a roundabout way of saying that you're full of ****, David.
You do have fear, and it's evident in your choice of hobby - and your choice of bigotry.
Go stick your head in the toilet.



David wrote:
When u say:
"If you have no fear, then you don't need a weapon"
that implies (foolishly) that a fearless condition
keeps away violent criminals; that 's nonsense; prove it. GO AHEAD; prove it.


Cycloptichorn wrote:
It doesn't imply that at all. You are making a logical error here.
Nonsense; I 'm just reading what u wrote and now u r trying to slither away from, in shame.




Quote:
If I do not fear getting a flat tire, will I then be immune from flats ??


No, but you won't care if you get them.

Quote:
If a man has no fear of heart attack, will he be immune therefrom?
If a man has no fear of unemployment, does he then have perfect job security??


Cycloptichorn wrote:
No, but you won't care if you have a heart attack.
You won't care if you lose your job, because you do not fear those outcomes.
I take it that English is not your first language, right ?

I hope that SOMEONE checks your engineering work, for safety; someone with a logical mind.





David
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 08:24 am
New York imam: Mosque fight about Muslim role

By BRIAN MURPHY, Associated Press Writer
2 hrs 45 mins ago

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – The imam leading plans for an Islamic center near the site of the Sept. 11 attacks in New York said the fight is over more than "a piece of real estate" and could shape the future of Muslim relations in America.

The dispute "has expanded beyond a piece of real estate and expanded to Islam in America and what it means for America," Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf told a group Tuesday that included professors and policy researchers in Dubai.

Rauf suggested that the fierce challenges to the planned mosque and community center in lower Manhattan could leave many Muslim questioning their place in American political and civic life.

But he avoided questions over whether an alternative site is possible. Instead, he repeatedly stressed the need to embrace the religious and political freedoms in the United States.

"I am happy to be American," Rauf told about 200 people at the Dubai School of Government think tank.

It was his last scheduled public appearance during a 15-day State Department-funded trip to the Gulf that was intended to promote religious tolerance.

The State Department said that Rauf was returning early to the United States on Wednesday.

State Department spokesman Mark Toner said the imam was departing the United Arab Emirates on Wednesday, and will return to New York. Toner said Rauf's early return did not cause the cancellation of any programs on his State Department-funded trip.

He said he became closer to Islam after moving to America, where he had the choice to either follow the faith or drift away.

"Like many of our fellow Muslims, we found our faith in America," he said.
During his Middle East trip, Rauf generally sidestepped questions over the backlash to the Islamic center location about two blocks from the former site of the World Trade Center towers.

But in an interview published Monday in the Abu Dhabi-based newspaper The National, he linked the protests to the U.S. elections in November. Many conservatives have joined the opposition to the center, which is being spearheaded by a newly formed nonprofit organization that includes real estate developers and has named Rauf as one of the directors.

"It is important to shift the discussion from a discussion of identity politics," he said. "We have to elevate the discourse because there is more that bonds us ... in terms of mutual responsibility."

A Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday showed 71 percent of New Yorkers want the developers to voluntarily move the project. A similar percentage also said they wanted New York's state attorney general to investigate sources of funding for the project in lower Manhattan.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg said an investigation would set "a terrible precedent."

"You don't want them investigating donations to religious organizations and there's no reason for the government to do so," he said.

He also played down the fact that the developers of the building where the center would be established owe over $200,000 in back taxes on the property. "They're going to be treated like everybody else," he said. "We enforce the law against everybody, or we protect everybody. And if they owe money, they should pay it. and if they don't, they don't."

The developers have said they are negotiating with the city to pay back the taxes.

Opponents of the center, which could include a swimming pool and a Sept. 11 memorial, have seized on the question of the project's funding, raising concerns that the money will come from overseas extremists or anti-American sources.

U.S. Rep. Peter King, a Republican who is the ranking minority leader of the Homeland Security Committee, said on Tuesday that he disagreed with the mayor. He said the question of financing is fundamental to assessing the Islamic center project's backers.

"A number of terror plots have emanated from mosques," he said, citing the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center as one example.

Arrests of conspirators in the attack that killed six people and injured more than a thousand led FBI to a Brooklyn mosque, where core members of those involved in the 1993 plot worshipped and where Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman sometimes led prayers. Abdel-Rahman was later convicted in the bombing.
King said he would call for churches or synagogues to undergo the same kind of scrutiny of their finances if there was evidence that terrorist plots were originating from them.

Developers of the planned Islamic center have pledged to hire "security consultants" to review potential contributors. A spokesman for the developers didn't immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment Tuesday.

It is common for the finances of religious groups to come under scrutiny either by the Internal Revenue Service, law enforcement or government agencies that protect consumers against fraud.

Religious nonprofits operate under a complex system of IRS rules on compensation, spending and governance. The IRS can revoke the nonprofit status of any group found to be violating the regulations.

Muslim charities have come under especially intense scrutiny under U.S. counterterrorism efforts. Federal prosecutors have brought cases against several American-based Muslim nonprofits, and in a separate case last year, seized U.S. mosques whose property is owned by a foundation federal officials say is secretly controlled by the Iranian government.
___
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 09:31 am
@sumac,
Sad but true; many Muslims are all citizens of this country by immigration or birth. They have served in our military, have attended our schools, and work in the many commercial enterprises and in government. They are Americans by every definition of the word.

We now have a group of conservatives who wish to limit their Constitutional Rights, and it's essentially based on ignorance and hate.

I wish these hateful so-called Americans will move to another country; they are destroying what America is all about.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 09:37 am
http://www.politico.com/blogs/maggiehaberman/0810/911_victims_families_group_opposes_anniversary_mosque_rallies.html?showall#

Quote:
9/11 victims' families group opposes anniversary mosque rallies

The rally set for the ninth anniversary of Sept. 11 against the Ground Zero-area mosque, which is being organized by conservative blogger Pamela Geller, is drawing opposition from a key 9/11 victims' families group that is asking that the event's date be moved and, if it isn't, that participants back out.

The word from "Where to Turn," a group that was launched by Staten Islander Dennis McKeon - who is not a victims' relative himself but who started a clearinghouse of information related to the attacks and to Ground Zero with Staten Island families - came in an email to their list just now, which is in full after the jump.

The email says that "such activities ...disrespect the memories of our loved ones on this sacred day at this sacred site."

The email notes there's an anti-mosque rally planned and also says there are reports of a pro-mosque rally being put in place - and Where to Turn is opposing both. (This is the first I'd heard of a pro-mosque event for that day).

McKeon and his group have often been at odds with Mayor Bloomberg - a major pro-mosque supporter - and other officials about issues related to the attack.

The rally being put together by Geller - who was highly critical of one 9 days ago that was arranged by 9/11 victims' relative Debra Burlingame, firefighter Tim Brown and others - will feature among its speakers Geert Wilders, a controversial Dutch politician known for what he's called his "hate" of Islam.

Others, including former UN ambassador John Bolton and commentator Andrew Breitbart, have given their blessing to the rally by recording videos to be presented at the event.

To All,

As most of you probably know there is a proposed protest rally against the mosque being planned for 9/11.

There are also reports that there is a pro mosque rally in the works for 9/11 as well.

Over the past 9 years we have had many issues with the way the site as well as the victim’s families have been treated.

Through it all we have always maintained the position that 9/11 was a day to respectfully remember and honor those who died.

We have always stood against any rallies scheduled for September 11th and we will do so again with these events.

We will be joining other 9/11 organizations in asking that the organizers change the date for these events.

If they refuse to change the date we will also ask those scheduled to appear to withdraw from the events.

Over the past 9 years more and more of what’s been going on at Ground Zero has excluded the families.

Just two years ago we had to threaten to hold our old ceremony to gain access to the pit.

This year we have been informed that 9/11 family members are being denied the right to read their loved ones names as the slots have been made available to people who have worked on the renovation of the site.

While it is appropriate to get others involved 9/11 families should never be denied this right.

All of these issues have and hopefully will be addressed going forward but we would never suggest that a rally be held to voice these concerns on 9/11.

Hopefully the organizers will reconsider and participants will back out if they don’t.

We will never support such activities that disrespect the memories of our loved ones on this sacred day at this sacred site.

We hope you will support our position.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 01:52 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Sad but true; many Muslims are all citizens of this country by immigration or birth. They have served in our military, have attended our schools, and work in the many commercial enterprises and in government. They are Americans by every definition of the word.

We now have a group of conservatives who wish to limit their Constitutional Rights, and it's essentially based on ignorance and hate.

I wish these hateful so-called Americans will move to another country; they are destroying what America is all about.
Ignorance of WHAT ??? Please be specific.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 03:16 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Since you are ignorant of the US Constitution, no more needs to be said.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 09:26 pm
ONION TIME!!!

Quote:
Man Already Knows Everything He Needs To Know About Muslims
AUGUST 30, 2010 | ISSUE 46•35
Source


Gentries made a conscious decision to stop learning anything new about the Muslim faith on May 22, 2005.


SALINA, KS—Local man Scott Gentries told reporters Wednesday that his deliberately limited grasp of Islamic history and culture was still more than sufficient to shape his views of the entire Muslim world.

Gentries, 48, said he had absolutely no interest in exposing himself to further knowledge of Islamic civilization or putting his sweeping opinions into a broader context of any kind, and confirmed he was "perfectly happy" to make a handful of emotionally charged words the basis of his mistrust toward all members of the world's second-largest religion.

"I learned all that really matters about the Muslim faith on 9/11," Gentries said in reference to the terrorist attacks on the United States undertaken by 19 of Islam's approximately 1.6 billion practitioners. "What more do I need to know to stigmatize Muslims everywhere as inherently violent radicals?"

"And now they want to build a mosque at Ground Zero," continued Gentries, eliminating any distinction between the 9/11 hijackers and Muslims in general. "No, I won't examine the accuracy of that statement, but yes, I will allow myself to be outraged by it and use it as evidence of these people's universal callousness toward Americans who lost loved ones when the Twin Towers fell."

"Even though I am not one of those people," he added.

When told that the proposed "Ground Zero mosque" is actually a community center two blocks north of the site that would include, in addition to a public prayer space, a 500-seat auditorium, a restaurant, and athletic facilities, Gentries shook his head and said, "I know all I'm going to let myself know."

Gentries explained that it "didn't take long" to find out as much about the tenets of Islam as he needed to. He said he knew Muslims stoned their women for committing adultery, trained for terrorist attacks at fundamentalist madrassas, and believed in jihad, which Gentries described as the thing they used to justify killing infidels.

"All Muslims are at war with America, and I will resist any attempt to challenge that assertion with potentially illuminating facts," said Gentries, who threatened to leave the room if presented with the number of Muslims who live peacefully in the United States, serve in the country's armed forces, or were victims themselves of the 9/11 attacks. "Period."

"If you don't believe me, wait until they put your wife in a burka," Gentries continued in reference to the face-and-body-covering worn by a small minority of Muslim women and banned in the universities of Turkey, Tunisia, and Syria. "Or worse, a rape camp. That's right: For reasons I am content being totally unable to articulate, I am choosing to associate Muslims with rape camps."

Over the past decade, Gentries said he has taken pains to avoid personal interactions or media that might have the potential to compromise his point of view. He told reporters that the closest he had come to confronting a contrary standpoint was tuning in to the first few seconds of an interview with a moderate Muslim cleric before hastily turning off the television.

"I almost gave in and listened to that guy defend Islam with words I didn't want to hear," Gentries said. "But then I remembered how much easier it is to live in a world of black-and-white in which I can assign the label of 'other' to someone and use him as a vessel for all my fears and insecurities."

Added Gentries, "That really put things back into perspective."
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 09:36 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:



I do not "FEAR" getting a flat tire; I 'd certainly care if it happened.



If you were constantly obsessing about getting a flat tire, it would be obvious you feared getting one.
You admit you would only care if you got a flat tire. That is different from obsessing out of fear.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 09:47 pm
@hingehead,
I wonder if his cultural or religious background has any terrorist, murder, rapist, or bigots? He must really hate himself!
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Sep, 2010 11:46 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
We now have a group of conservatives who wish to limit their Constitutional Rights, and it's essentially based on ignorance and hate


Are you sure its only conservatives that are opposed to this mosque?
That seems to be a pretty broad brush you are using, especially since I know for a fact that not all conservatives are opposed to it.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 12:22 am
@mysteryman,
Quote:
"There is a proposal to build a mosque and Islamic cultural center a few blocks from the site of the World Trade Center in New York City where the September 11th terrorist attacks occurred. Do you think it is appropriate or not appropriate to build a mosque and Islamic center near the site of the World Trade Center?"


Appropriate / Not appropriate / Unsure
% % %
ALL
22 ................... 71 .......................7



Republicans
10 ........................88 .........................2



Democrats
32 .........................57 ..............................11



Independents
22...................... 70.................................8

http://www.pollingreport.com/religion.htm

It seems that CI thinks that 70% of Americans don't love this country enough to stay here, that we should vacate. Interesting position for a person who claims to be arguing for tolerance.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 04:03 am
@hawkeye10,
Majority thinking doesn't equate to being right. Read the US Constitution, and learn a little about bigotry and discrimination against any group of Americans.

There's nothing wrong with my thinking. It's sad to see that only 22% of Americans understand the US Constitution.
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 04:07 am
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
It's sad to see that only 22% of Americans understand the US Constitution.
A 78% majority gets its way no matter what you think that constitution means, as this majority can rewrite the Constitution if you and your minority keep bitching and whining and thus demand that the majority goes to this extreme to shut you up.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 04:10 am
@hawkeye10,
The "majority" does not rewrite the Constitution. The government is left with the interpretation of the Constitution; and are given the task to "improve" upon it. The government cannot take away rights of its citizens.

It goes hand-in-hand with the Bill of Rights. Try to learn them if you failed to learn them in school.

Quote:
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights. Ratified 7/9/1868. Note History

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 05:39 am
@cicerone imposter,
CI,
Do you honestly believe that everyone opposed to the mosque being built AT THAT LOCATION does so because they are a bigot?

Do you not think that some people could be opposed for other legitimate reasons?
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Sep, 2010 05:52 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Majority thinking doesn't equate to being right. Read the US Constitution, and learn a little about bigotry and discrimination against any group of Americans.

There's nothing wrong with my thinking. It's sad to see that only 22% of Americans understand the US Constitution.


I don't read this as only 22% of Americans understand your constitution. I read it that 22% of those polled do not agree with what the constitution says about the matter. They voted on preference, not legality.

You also cannot use this poll as an indication of what all Americans think.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2025 at 08:38:14