@JTT,
JTT wrote:
Those who provide cover for people who have committed the above, people like MM, really aren't much better than the original perpetrators.
I do not think any "cover" was being "provided" by asking a salient question, in context of the inability to see any good that the U.S. has done:
- The Berlin Airlift
- The Korean War
- Not vanquishing Germany after WWII, in context of Germany having had plans to turn Eastern Europe into a big plantation to feed the Fatherland, populated by ethnic Germans.
- The Emancipation Proclamation
- Allowing every religion, every ethnic/nationality to become U.S. citizens and live a lifestyle commensurate with their efforts.
- Sending men to fight the Kaiser in WWI
- Food stamps and social security (that serves as a pension for some expatriates that work in the U.S. and then retire back to their country of origin).
Get it? If one only focusses on supposed negatives, when there are also positives, many a sentient being might be suspecting that one is listening to an idealogue, rather than a purveyor of "balanced truth."
And, to assert that any diversion from addressing the supposed sins is tantamount to giving cover to the sinners, is specious, since raising a question is not giving cover to anyone, and claiming the question is giving cover, could be misconstrued as an attempt to silence such a question. Not raising a question could be thought of as giving tacit approval for an idealogue to continue an effort at proselytization which may or may not be correct.