46
   

Mosque to be Built Near Ground Zero

 
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 07:49 pm
@old europe,
The people who are concerned about funding and about Iman Rauf's possible terrorist sympathies, are not the ones carrying on about location. They are concerned that a foreign government plowing $100 million into this project could then do things, right in NYC, which would be against American interests. This is a whole separate issue. It has nothing to do with where the mosque is located. Iman Rauf was seen as less threatening when he didn't potentially have a huge building to attract lots of people, and when he wouldn't be funneling a huge amount of foreign government money into his mosque.

The specific qualms about Rauf is the only opposition I have heard that makes some sense to me. And the issue is security. The issue can also be resolved if Iman Rauf would be more straightforward. Like saying if he considers Hamas a terrorist organization, rather than hedging about it.

If you really look into it, this is not an existing Muslim congregation that just needs a new building. Only one floor of the 13 story building would be a mosque. This is a new venture, based on an idea that Rauf and Khan have had for years for a YMCA type place that included a mosque. Khan looked at a building elsewhere in Manhattan, several years ago, for the same purpose. But, usually, when people want to go ahead with a $100 million project, they have some idea where they will get the money. That the developers behind this project are so vague about it, is strange.

I suppose that having a building which includes a lot of profitable money making facilities, as well as a mosque, can give them a write off, as a religious institution, for the whole enterprise because one floor is a mosque. Does anyone know whether that would be the case?

Truthfully, I've come to the conclusion that the people behind this project are inept at both PR and business sense. They should have tried to smooth the waters with better PR before this issue went so public, and even Daisy Khan admits that now. And they should have started to line up funding sources, and made those public. If they can't raise the money, this whole issue could be a tempest in a teapot.



0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 07:52 pm
@Caroline,
A read of this thread addresses all sides and angles of the situation.

Triumph for the Muslims? What did the Muslims do? Are you referring to the handful of terrorists that happened to be Muslim that flew planes? This too is discussed in the thread.

You do realize that the site is two blocks away and not within site of ground zero?
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 07:58 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:

A read of this thread addresses all sides and angles of the situation.

Triumph for the Muslims? What did the Muslims do? Are you referring to the handful of terrorists that happened to be Muslim that flew planes? This too is discussed in the thread.

You do realize that the site is two blocks away and not within site of ground zero?
Yes as I said this is just ridiculous to assume that it's nothing more then building a place of worship for muslims, who the majority of muslims do not agree with the terrorist and do not wish to build a mosque to make some sort of statement that supports the terrorist. The fact that the site is two blocks away proves my point that it is ridiculous to assume that there is any malice behind it.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 08:28 pm
@Caroline,
Caroline, I'm glad you're here, but much has been talked about, please peruse the thread.

(not trying to get you to agree with me, but it saves the rest of us from repeating ourselves)
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 08:29 pm
@ossobuco,
I have been following it, not too closely, am I missing something? Okay sorry I don't want you to repeat yourselves, I wont contribute until I've read it properly, sorry folks.
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 08:33 pm
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

I have been following it, not too closely, am I missing something?


There is probably nothing that has not been discussed already. Everythings from bigotry, fear, ignorance, hatred, constitution, location, assumptions, facts to bigotry, fear, ignorance, hatred, constitution, location and assumptions.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 08:39 pm
@Intrepid,
Which is dangerous because it causes tension, creates more problems and interferes with the right to build a place of worship so our values are at risk of crumbling. Being anti-muslim because of the WTC attacks is bigotry and does nothing but cause damage. If we cannot live side by side and respect each others rights without being ignorant of each other then how are we supposed to live! I mean it's a bad show.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 08:44 pm
@Caroline,
Caroline wrote:

Which is dangerous because it causes tension, creates more problems and interferes with the right to build a place of worship so our values are at risk of crumbling. Being anti-muslim because of the WTC attacks is bigotry and does nothing but cause damage. If we cannot live side by side and respect each others rights without being ignorant of each other then how are we supposed to live! I mean it's a bad show.


You obviously have not read any of my posts. You seem to be putting me on the side of the bigots and naysayers.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:06 pm
I was just checking out the news stories on this controversy, and I came across this startling article written by two Muslims who are board members of the Muslim Canadian Congress. They feel that this proposed mosque was meant to be a deliberate act of provocation "meant to thumb our noses at the infidel". They do not approve of the idea at all. They do not think this mosque should be built. Their view of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is far from positive.

This is a very different perspective on the mosque controversy, written by two Muslims. I would urge everyone to at least read it.

Quote:

Updated: Aug. 11, 2010 5:03 a.m.
Muslim mischief in Manhattan
By RAHEEL RAZA and TAREK FATAH
Board members of the Muslim Canadian Congress

Last week, a journalist who writes for the North County Times, a small newspaper in Southern California, sent us an e-mail titled "Help." He couldn't understand why an Islamic Centre in an area where Adam Gadahn, Osama bin Laden's American spokesman came from, and that was home to three of the 911 terrorists, was looking to expand.

The man has a very valid point, which leads to the ongoing debate about building a Mosque at Ground Zero in New York. When we try to understand the reasoning behind building a mosque at the epicenter of the worst-ever attack on the U.S., we wonder why its proponents don't build a monument to those who died in the attack?

New York currently boasts at least 30 mosques so it's not as if there is pressing need to find space for worshippers. The fact we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel. The proposal has been made in bad faith and in Islamic parlance, such an act is referred to as "Fitna," meaning "mischief-making" that is clearly forbidden in the Koran.

The Koran commands Muslims to, "Be considerate when you debate with the People of the Book" – i.e., Jews and Christians. Building an exclusive place of worship for Muslims at the place where Muslims killed thousands of New Yorkers is not being considerate or sensitive, it is undoubtedly an act of "fitna."
So what gives Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the "Cordoba Initiative" and his cohorts the misplaced idea that they will increase tolerance for Muslims by brazenly displaying their own intolerance in this case?

Do they not understand that building a mosque at Ground Zero is equivalent to permitting a Serbian Orthodox church near the killing fields of Srebrenica where 8,000 Muslim men and boys were slaughtered?

There are many questions that we would like to ask. Questions about where the funding is coming from? If this mosque is being funded by Saudi sources, then it is an even bigger slap in the face of Americans, as nine of the jihadis in the Twin Tower calamity were Saudis.

If Rauf is serious about building bridges, then he could have dedicated space in this so-called community centre to a church and synagogue, but he did not. We passed on this message to him through a mutual Saudi friend, but received no answer. He could have proposed a memorial to the 9/11 dead with a denouncement of the doctrine of armed jihad, but he chose not to.

It's a repugnant thought that $100 million would be brought into the United States rather than be directed at dying and needy Muslims in Darfur or Pakistan.

Let's not forget that a mosque is an exclusive place of worship for Muslims and not an inviting community center. Most Americans are wary of mosques due to the hard core rhetoric that is used in pulpits. And rightly so. As Muslims we are dismayed that our co-religionists have such little consideration for their fellow citizens and wish to rub salt in their wounds and pretend they are applying a balm to soothe the pain.

The Koran implores Muslims to speak the truth, even if it hurts the one who utters the truth. Today we speak the truth, knowing very well Muslims have forgotten this crucial injunction from Allah.

If this mosque does get built, it will forever be a lightning rod for those who have little room for Muslims or Islam in the U.S. We simply cannot understand why on earth the traditional leadership of America's Muslims would not realize their folly and back out in an act of goodwill.

As for those teary-eyed, bleeding-heart liberals such as New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and much of the media, who are blind to the Islamist agenda in North America, we understand their goodwill.

Unfortunately for us, their stand is based on ignorance and guilt, and they will never in their lives have to face the tyranny of Islamism that targets, kills and maims Muslims worldwide, and is using liberalism itself to destroy liberal secular democratic societies from within.

Raheel Raza is author of Their Jihad ... Not my Jihad, and Tarek Fatah is author of The Jew is Not My Enemy (McClelland & Stewart), to be launched in October. Both sit on the board of the Muslim Canadian Congress.
This column was first printed in the Ottawa Citizen.
http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/muslims-261529-mosque-understand.html


Well, I don't think we can dismiss these two as being bigots or anti-Muslim. Truthfully, now I'm not sure what to think about this mosque. They still have have the right to build it, but, perhaps, some of the supporters, who see all opponents as bigots, might think a little more about that after reading this article. These writers also do seem to have qualms about Rauf and where his loyalties lie.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:10 pm
@Caroline,
I don't mean to be kvetchy and it's getting to be a long thread -

I'm not trying to direct your opinion, just saying, check out a roundelay of opinions, perhaps with a light hand, overall.
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:17 pm
@firefly,
Not really a lot different than other news items that have been written. It is also interesting that these two fellows are selling books. Good publicity for them in writing this article.

Another thing that caught my eye was..
Quote:
It's a repugnant thought that $100 million would be brought into the United States rather than be directed at dying and needy Muslims in Darfur or Pakistan.

Are they displeased that the money is being spent in the U.S, rather than Pakistan?

I am not ready to change my mind back, yet.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:18 pm
@ossobuco,
I'm too tired to go through 350 posts now. I thought I got the gist of both sides, that some see it as the muslims rubbing our noses in it and some say not all muslims are extremists and they have just as much right as anyone else to build a place of worship, protecting your constitutional rights.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:22 pm
@Intrepid,
No not at all Intrepid, I'm just saying it's dangerous to assume all muslims are extremist because of.......(what I said in the post). I don't understand how you thought I was directing that at you and that I said you are a bigot but I'm sorry if I caused confusion. No my posts are just thoughts not directed at anybody. Sorry Intrepid if you thought I meant you but that was not my intention at all.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 09:56 pm
@Intrepid,
I don't think they wrote that article to sell books, I think they are syndicated columnists who write regularly.

Yes, they are displeased that $100 million wouldn't be spent to help Muslims in need elsewhere, like Dafur, or Pakistan. They are clearly accusing Rauf of being a bad Muslim, in many ways, in terms of the tenets of their faith.

They also point out that Rauf has not denounced the attacks of 9/11--that's why they said he should put up a memorial to the victims of 9/11 that also denounces jihadism. They are suggesting he should not be trusted in terms of his motives with this mosque.

This doesn't change my mind, but it does make me want to know more, and think about it more. Things are not always what they seem, and that may include this proposed mosque.

These writers obviously do see a clear threat from Islamism operating in some American mosques, and our liberalism does allow for that. They are saying we shouldn't be naive about that threat. I was surprised about their comments about Mayor Bloomberg being a liberal bleeding heart.

We were dumb on 9/11 about airport security, that's what allowed 4 planes to be simultaneously hijacked by a group of men armed only with box cutters. These writers are saying we shouldn't be so dumb about what's going on with some mosques. They are also saying that Saudi Arabia might be controlling the one in NYC if that's where the money comes from.

Interesting food for thought...

This column, I also just found, makes similar points about liberals being misguided on this particular issue. This writer is not saying that the mosque can't be built, no one questions the constitutional right, he's saying Rauf should back off, because the proposal is deliberately provocative and is serving to increase tensions.

Quote:


Mosque would mock 9/11
By Star Parker
Monday, August 9, 2010

The mosque project at Ground Zero should not go forward and let’s hope that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, who is behind the $100 million effort, gets the message and backs off.

But given what he is hearing from the liberals in New York, including the city’s mayor, the congressman in whose district Ground Zero sits and The New York Times , it’s hard to be optimistic he’ll change his mind.

Opposition to the mosque is being portrayed, as the Times editorial page put it, as abandoning “the principles of freedom and tolerance.” But the Times makes its own tenuous grasp of reality clear, noting, “The attacks of Sept. 11 were not a religious event.”

We can only wonder what those at the Times think was motivating the young Muslims who committed suicide, taking 3,000 innocent people with them.

The Web site for the project, the Cordoba Initiative, advertises itself as “Improving Muslim-West Relations,” and “steering the world back to the course of mutual recognition and respect and away from heightened tensions.”

But if Feisal Abdul Rauf is primarily motivated to “reduce heightened tensions,” why would he do something as obviously provocative as building a mosque and Islamic Center 600 feet away from Ground Zero?

Critical to grasp here is the suggestion of the need for dialogue. That the existence of Islamic terrorism is the result of problems with Americans as well as problems that may exist in Islam. And it all would be fixed if we understood each other.

This is simply false.

Americans don’t need any lessons about freedom and tolerance.

Millions of Muslim Americans live, prosper and practice their faith freely in our country. According to a Google search, there are about 2,000 mosques in the United States.

We have one Muslim American member of Congress who took his oath of office with his hand on the Koran.

Many American universities have programs where students can learn about Islam, including Columbia in New York City.

As we know, President Barack Obama brought with him to the presidency a conviction that we Americans somehow bore some responsibility for the antipathy toward us in the Islamic world and that outreach would help.

But, of course, this is false. As Johns Hopkins University Middle East Scholar Fouad Ajami pointed out in The Wall Street Journal, Obama’s outreach program has accomplished only diminished respect for us in the Islamic world. Antipathy continues to run high and unchanged and it’s not because there something wrong with us. It’s because, as Ajami writes, the U.S. is a convenient scapegoat for nations and rulers that refuse to address their own problems.

Of the 17 nations that Freedom House rates the “worst of the worst” regarding their state of freedom, six are Islamic nations.

Feisal Abdul Rauf should spend his $100 million - wherever it’s coming from - to advance the cause of freedom in Islamic countries. That is where the problem is, not here.

Star Parker is an author and president of the Center for Urban Renewal and Education.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/opinion/op_ed/view.bg?articleid=1273186




0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 10:00 pm
@Caroline,
In that case, may I respectfully suggest that you not hit the reply button on a particular post. Instead, scroll down near the bottom and hit the Reply to All button. That way, your post is generic and not a reply to a particular poster. Not to worry, many A2Kers make this same foible.
Caroline
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 10:03 pm
@Intrepid,
Okay sorry about that, but my post/thoughts was leading on from yours. I can see how you thought I meant you personally though.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 10:08 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Cycloptichorn wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

Cycloptichorn wrote:
It is a concern born of bigotry and the casual lumping of people into groups.
So what ??

David


At least you, for one, are willing to wear your bigotry on your sleeve, Bigot. I condemn your opinions.
You should be ashamed of yourself [ Being so advised, I am PROUD ]- you are no different than those
you purport to be against.

Cycloptichorn
As I 've pointed out b4, a bigot is a man of strong opinions,
unwilling to kiss the foot of the King of England "by God".
I 'll stand up for my opinions; I always have.

U r a damned liar F'ART, and u will be until I drive a plane or 2
into a tall Moslem edifice and another into a Moslem military H.Q.,
after murdering all of the flight deck officers, by surprize.

U r just motivated by your anti-Americanism (like Obama),
and therefore, u delight in favoring any of America 's enemies.





David
Intrepid
 
  3  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 10:12 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Actually, David, a bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.

Being a MENSA member, you should be able to figure that out. I hope you don't intend to take flying lessons.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 10:29 pm
@Intrepid,
Intrepid wrote:
Actually, David, a bigot is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.
Yes; he judged against kissing the Royal English foot, before the event,
and he did not tolerate the demands that he acquiesce,
nor did he chicken out, even tho his life was at risk.
He had the courage of his convictions; better than most do.
In other words: the bi gott was Intrepid.



Intrepid wrote:
Being a MENSA member, you should be able to figure that out.
That 's etymological history, not calculation.




Intrepid wrote:
I hope you don't intend to take flying lessons.
I have guys who do that FOR me.
(like the ones who were murdered by Moslems on 9/11/1)





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Aug, 2010 11:17 pm
1
Quote:

US Muslims prep for Islamic holiday _ around 9/11
By RACHEL ZOLL (AP) – 18 hours ago

NEW YORK — The lunar calendar that Muslims follow for religious holidays is creating a potential for misunderstandings or worse in a year when American Muslims are already confronting a spike in assaults on their faith and protests against new mosques.

Eid al-Fitr, a joyous holiday marking the end of the holy month of Ramadan, this year falls around Sept. 11. Muslim leaders fear that their gatherings for prayer and festivities could be misinterpreted by those unfamiliar with Islam as a celebration of the 2001 terrorist strikes.

The Muslim Public Affairs Council, an advocacy group based in Los Angeles, is contacting law enforcement and the Justice Department civil rights division to alert them to the overlap.

The Islamic Circle of North America, which organizes Muslim Family Days at the Six Flags amusement park in several cities around Eid al-Fitr, this year planned nothing for Saturday, Sept. 11, because of the anniversary. A founder of Muslim Family Day, Tariq Amanullah, worked at the World Trade Center and was killed in the attacks.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based civil rights group, is urging mosques to review the group's security guidelines, including clearing brush where people could hide and installing surveillance cameras.

"The issue I can sense brewing on hate sites on the Internet is, `These Muslims are celebrating on September 11,'" said Ibrahim Hooper, national spokesman for CAIR. "It's getting really scary out there."

The exact date of Eid al-Fitr this year is not yet known. Muslims follow different authorities on moonsightings and astronomical calculations to decide when a holiday begins. In North America, the eid could fall on Thursday, Sept. 9, Friday, Sept. 10, or Saturday, Sept. 11.

It is one of the two biggest Muslim holidays of the year, often compared to Christmas in its significance and revelry. (The other major holiday is Eid al-Adha, at the end of the hajj, the annual pilgrimage to Mecca.)

Muslims who rarely attend congregational prayer fill mosques to overflowing on Eid al-Fitr. Mosque leaders often rent hotel ballrooms or convention centers to handle the crowds. Families wear their best clothes, exchange gifts, plan special meals with friends and relatives, sometimes decorate their homes inside and out, and organize carnivals for children.

In predominantly Muslim countries, the celebration can last for three days. But because of work and school obligations in the U.S., American Muslims generally attend congregational prayer on the day of the holiday, then continue the festivities over the next weekend or two.

Most mosques usually intensify security around Ramadan because of the attention the month brings. This year, leaders have grown especially concerned about safety. In recent months, mosques around the country have faced protests and vandalism. The debate over a proposed mosque and Islamic center near ground zero has become a national issue.

Yet well before these recent tensions, American Muslim leaders saw trouble ahead when they checked the calendar. Haroon Moghul, a New York Muslim leader who speaks regularly at mosques, said mosque leaders have been discussing Eid al-Fitr for months.

"When we realized that Ramadan would be ending around that time, a lot of people started sitting down together and saying, `How do we handle this in a way that's appropriate?'" said Moghul, executive director of Maydan Institute, a communications consulting company.

Moghul said most New York Muslims likely won't celebrate the way they normally do, and noted that a significant number lost relatives when the World Trade Center was destroyed. Many imams in the city plan sermons on dealing with loss and grief.

"It's a very painful day for everyone," Moghul said.

However, he and other American Muslim leaders don't want to make so many changes that they appear to be giving in to those who reject any Muslim observance in the United States. Some critics have said Muslims should move the date of the eid.

"It's like being offended that 9/11 and Christmas fall on the same day," said Safaa Zarzour, secretary general of the Islamic Society of North America, an Indiana-based communal group with tens of thousands of members. "There is something unsettling about that."

Yvonne Maffei, 35, of Des Plaines, Ill., a Chicago suburb, said she and her husband plan to stick with their usual Eid al-Fitr plan. They will attend morning prayers at their local mosque, go out for brunch then visit friends during the day.

"I think most Americans understand the value and place of religious holidays in a person's life," said Maffei, editor of My Halal Kitchen, a blog with recipes that meet Islamic dietary laws. "For those who don't, I just hope they will take the time to try and understand not only why we are celebrating at this time, but also what we are celebrating, which is the end of the holy month of Ramadan, a blessed month of fasting and attaining closeness to Allah."

Rizwan Jaka, a board member of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society, based in Sterling, Va., near Washington, D.C., said he hopes the attention to Muslim traditions during the month of Ramadan will help educate non-Muslims and decrease the likelihood of any problems.

He said the mosque will reach out to its interfaith partners and others ahead of the eid. The All Dulles Society is one of the largest mosques in the country and expects to host as many as 20,000 worshippers during the holiday at several locations.

Jaka said the board met a few weeks ago to discuss the overlapping dates and decided to include condemnations of terrorism and extremism in the holiday sermons. The mosque will also hold its annual interfaith, memorial and peace events tied to the anniversary.

"Could there be some misperceptions because of the anti-Muslim climate? Potentially," Jaka said. "We will make sure our neighbors and friends understand that we all stand firmly as Americans for peace and for creating an environment of respect."

Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.


Quote:


US Muslims concerned over Eid, 9/11 anniversary overlap
(AFP) – 8 hours ago

NEW YORK — US Muslim groups have urged law enforcement agencies to be on guard during Eid al-Fitr, the end-of-Ramadan holiday which this year coincides with the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terror attacks, officials said Friday.

A spokeswoman for the Los Angeles-based Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), an advocacy group, said local and federal agencies across the country were being asked to remain vigilant during the Eid celebrations.

MPAC communications director Edina Lekovic said the warning came because of what she called a "heightened climate of Islamophobia" in recent months, citing protests against plans to build an Islamic center and mosque in Manhattan, not far from the site of Ground Zero.

"We're seeing consistent cases of protests taking place in front of some mosques organized largely by Islamophobic groups," Lekovic told AFP.

"At this stage it's just a precaution because there are many mosque leaders around the country who are understandably concerned for their congregations and want to be sure that they're taking preventative measures and that law enforcement is on standby if, God forbid, there are any issues that need to be dealt with."

Lekovic emphasized that Ramadan and Eid festivals in the United States usually passed without incident.

"By and large, Ramadan and the Eid holidays are peacefully celebrated by Muslims and ignored by the public," she said.

However the furor over the Ground Zero mosque and cases including a Florida church that has announced plans to hold "International Burn a Koran Day" on September 11 have triggered concerns of possible hate crimes.

"We're asking local police and sheriff's departments to be vigilant as well as federal authorities. We're asking federal authorities to examine cases where there are violent acts against Muslims or mosques," Lekovic said.

Copyright © 2010 AFP. All rights reserved


It is really unfortunate that Muslim Americans have to be so concerned about security this year and not just joyously celebrate their holidays.

But, if these Muslim leaders realized there might be a particular problem this year, because their celebrations would coincide with the anniversary of 9/11, at the same time that anti-Muslim incidents across the country have increased because of the activity of hate groups, weren't the backers of the NYC mosque project aware of that too?

Why would Iman Feisal Abdul Rauf, and Daisy Khan choose this particular year to go public with their plans to develop a center/mosque, a project that they had to know would incite and provoke controversy because of its proximity to Ground Zero? Did they want to bring the anti-Muslim sentiment sweeping the country to a head? Were they even thinking about how the announcement of their project, and the predictable backlash, would affect other Muslims? It's hard to think of the NYC mosque project as being designed to promote inter-faith harmony, when the timing of the announcement of the project was almost designed to throw fuel on an already existing anti-Muslim fire, in a year when Muslims were particularly anticipating problems surrounding their holiday observances and 9/11.

I'm not sure what to think about this whole situation any more. Nothing may be as it seems. There may be a lot of hidden agendas.
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 01/12/2025 at 11:47:03