@engineer,
Quote:As for invading and putting in place a freely elected government, how is that working in Iraq? And Iraq had a secular government (with some religious trappings) before the US invasion. For small, relatively weak countries, only the harshest of dictatorships or theocracies can withstand powerful country interference. These forms of government can demand that their citizens endure any type of hardship for either the beloved leader or God so that all means of pressure against them fail.
Sorry knocking out the current government and placing our own in is more then doable and might in the future prove to be needed without the need to do great harm to the country as a whole.
No amount of religion motivations is going to do a bit of good against our technology and the religion leadership that we do not place a smart bomb up their rear ends will once more be in exile in France.
Hell after what happen after one president told Sadam and his sons to leave in 48 hours from Iraq I would not be surprise if those brave religion leaders was running to the airport to get on planes for France far ahead of our invasion.
Knocking out the current government and placing our own in is more then doable and might in the future prove to be needed.
No amount of religion motivations is going to do a bit of good against our technology and the religion leadership that we do not place a smart bomb up their rear ends will once more be in exile in France.
Oh?, the Iraq people was all against us when we walk in?
Footnote as a matter of fact Iraq is working out just fine and we had become a somewhat spoil people when it come to losing any of our troops given the task the cost had not been all that great. Far less then the taking of one major island in the South Pacific during WW2 for example.
In fact increasing the arm forces manpower at this time of high unemployment and spending more money on technology might just be what our country need now to get the country humming away as WW2 did for us in ending the great depression.