8
   

Gun permit allows quick access to Texas Capitol

 
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 06:32 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
One does not need to know American history to recognize gobbledee gook. The matter here is one of grammar and logic, not history. As for the history, you were proved wrong by PArados' quotation of the dissenting opinion.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 06:33 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
A private militia? Pirates? Thieves? Rapists? Bullies?
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 06:34 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Let's face it, David, you've been bested, not once but twice.
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 06:37 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Bear in mind: in the 1700s, there were NO police in the USA, nor in England.
Self defense was a very individual matter and your life depended on it.


That sounds like an admission that the 2nd Amendment is out of date, irrelevant and, therefore, should be amended out of the Constitution.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 11:20 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
One does not need to know American history to recognize gobbledee gook.
The matter here is one of grammar and logic, not history.
No, Plain; the grammarians are on MY side, as the USSC has held in HELLER
and re-affirmed in McDONALD




plainoldme wrote:
As for the history, you were proved wrong by PArados' quotation of the dissenting opinion.
I stand by what I said; no problem.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 11:22 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
A private militia? Pirates? Thieves? Rapists? Bullies?
MULTIPLE private militia, like volunteer fire dept.s
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 11:23 pm
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Let's face it, David, you've been bested, not once but twice.
Nonsense, Plain.
That 's your wishful thinking.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Aug, 2010 11:27 pm
@plainoldme,
David wrote:
Bear in mind: in the 1700s, there were NO police in the USA, nor in England.
Self defense was a very individual matter and your life depended on it.


plainoldme wrote:
That sounds like an admission that the 2nd Amendment is out of date,
irrelevant and, therefore, should be amended out of the Constitution.
No; u r simply confused, Plain.
It will become a lot more relevant very soon, as gun control laws are torn down in the near future
because of McDONALD, and gun control follows in the footsteps of nazism & communism into extinction.

The police prevent very few crimes, because criminals
ofen prefer to commit felonies in private; the police just try to avenge the victim, be he alive or not.

When seconds count, the police are just minutes away.

When I got shot at, I was alone, except for the criminals.
When Kitty Genovese and Reginald Denny were attacked
(the latter on national TV for about an hour), how much good
did the police do him, Prof. Plain. Will u explain that to me??
The police are good only for vengeance, after the fact.

I win; u lose and THAT is the Supreme Law of the Land !





David
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 06:52 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

plainoldme wrote:
A private militia? Pirates? Thieves? Rapists? Bullies?
MULTIPLE private militia, like volunteer fire dept.s


Private fire departments? I don't know of any.
volunteer militia would be the national guard, not David owning a gun since Congress is given certain powers in relation to militias.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 06:53 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I win; u lose and THAT is the Supreme Law of the Land !


Really? It says that in the Constitution?

Oh, wait... it doesn't say that at all. That's David just making stuff up.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 07:14 am
@OmSigDAVID,
So, grammarians sued on behalf of those nutcases Heller and McDonald? Were the grammarians from the MLA or another organization?
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 07:16 am
@OmSigDAVID,
It is not wishful thinking. The nutcases of the NRA are on a temporary ascendancy with the rest of the extreme right. After the gun laws are loosened and there are waves of violence, the collective face of America, replete with egg, will dump the second Amendment. It might take 40, even 60 years, but it will happen.
plainoldme
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 07:17 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I win; u lose and THAT is the Supreme Law of the Land !


How fifth grade!
OmSigDAVID
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:12 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:

Quote:
I win; u lose and THAT is the Supreme Law of the Land !


How fifth grade!
From every mountainside: let FREEDOM RING !
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:21 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
It is not wishful thinking. The nutcases of the NRA are on a temporary ascendancy with the rest of the extreme right.
After the gun laws are loosened and there are waves of violence, the collective face of America, replete with egg,
will dump the second Amendment. It might take 40, even 60 years, but it will happen.
In 1987, Florida began a string of dominos, falling for freedom, rejecting gun control,
in favor of granting licenses for concealed guns to be issued automatically upon demand,
unless the applicant has something drastically rong with him,
e.g., a nasty criminal history or an adjudication, after hearing,
of mental disability; i.e., about 40 States followed Florida in doing that.
When gun control was rejected, in each State: crime dropped,
inasmuch as future victims were armed (if such thay desired).

After gun control went into effect (in earlier years): crime went UP, and got worse,
because future victims were disarmed for the criminals' safety,
by operation of law. Gun control is the Workers' Paradise for violent criminals,
so far as personal safety on-the-job is concerned.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:26 am

Of those States (about 40 of the 50 States) who rejected gun control
in favor of freedom: NONE -- count 'em-- not one of them,
has ever gone back to gun control, since 1987.





David



plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:28 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Well, that may be fine to you, but, you have lived what I might call and do, an "unlived life," unhinged from reality and experience.

Furthermore, what you call freedom, others see as expressions of license, immaturity and paranoia. Your emphasis on the need for security is rather pathetic.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:29 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Which states are those that have no laws concerning guns?
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:39 am
@parados,
parados wrote:
Which states are those that have no laws concerning guns?
Freedom prevails in Vermont, Alaska and Arizona
(tho thay continue to legally discriminate against children).

Soon Utah, and Wyoming r expected to follow; then others,
when their good experience proves to be good examples.





David
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Thu 5 Aug, 2010 08:47 am
@plainoldme,
plainoldme wrote:
Well, that may be fine to you, but, you have lived what I might call and do, an "unlived life,"
unhinged from reality and experience.
Define n explain ??


plainoldme wrote:
Furthermore, what you call freedom, others see as expressions of license,
Let them be damned; what thay "see" has no effect, other than upon their own minds.
America is supposed to be the Land of the FREE and the home of the Brave.



plainoldme wrote:
immaturity and paranoia.
Is it your position that crime is a delusion ?



plainoldme wrote:
Your emphasis on the need for security is rather pathetic.
That 's a subjective thing for u to admit,
but its harmless. If u or those whose well-being u favor
fall victim to the predatory violence of man or beast,
out of good manners, we freedom-lovers will try not to laff. OK ?

Remember the Susan Gonzalez experience.





David
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.56 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 12:55:41