Gun permit allows quick access to Texas Capitol

@parados,

parados wrote:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38313069/ns/us_news-life

Gotta love Texans. They like to live on the edge.
If we have a gun problem, let's just introduce more guns.

Its always better to have future victims well-armed.

David

1 Reply

@Green Witch,

Quote:

A well regulated Militia...

Green Witch wrote:

Not every Yahoo who thinks his dick
isn't big enough and hasn't committed a felony.

U repressionists! Your minds ALWAYS go to sex! U never let up.
I wonder Y that IS !?

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

I frequently scratch my head over your responses. You seem to have lived in a bubble. There is just too much that you do not know and logic seems to escape you.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

An eye for an eye until all are blind.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Our society abandoned the open carrying of guns and swords long ago. Why are you screaming, "Forward, into the past!"

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

I frequently scratch my head over your responses. You seem to have lived in a bubble. There is just too much that you do not know and logic seems to escape you.

Funny how ignorant bigots always blame other people for the fact that they can't understand anything.

plainoldme wrote:

Our society abandoned the open carrying of guns and swords long ago. Why are you screaming, "Forward, into the past!"

You freedom haters always pretend that "taking away freedom" is progress.

It isn't.

0 Replies

If we are to return to the old-fashioned open toting of guns, perhaps, it would be best if we altered our economy, sexual morality, style of dress and technology to match the days when a gun was an essential accessory.

Let's return to hand crafting goods and shipping them by sail. Let's get rid of birth control and return to bungling. Women, go buy a bustle and corset! And, please, do away with computers, cell phones, land lines, television, radio, automobiles and planes.

Forward! Into the Past!

2 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

If we are to return to the old-fashioned open toting of guns, perhaps, it would be best if we altered our economy, sexual morality, style of dress and technology to match the days when a gun was an essential accessory.

Let's return to hand crafting goods and shipping them by sail. Let's get rid of birth control and return to bungling. Women, go buy a bustle and corset! And, please, do away with computers, cell phones, land lines, television, radio, automobiles and planes.

Forward! Into the Past!

Only freedom haters think freedom is old fashioned.

0 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

If we are to return to the old-fashioned open toting of guns,
perhaps, it would be best if we altered our economy,

Yes; more Individualism, self-reliance, less collectivism,
de-emphasizing and weakening domestic government,
reducing its domestic jurisdiction.

plainoldme wrote:

sexual morality,

How does that work ?
Being armed is unrelated to sexuality.
It always has been.

plainoldme wrote:

style of dress

Well, I 've usually worn vested suits; carrying guns openly can be awkward,
espeicially in cold, wet weather. It makes sense to return to complete laissez faire keeping & bearing of guns.
Let the wearer do whatever he pleases,
the same as wearing a watch.
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was simply to
make it clear that government has no jurisdiction
in the area of gun possession.

What a citizen wears is none of government 's business.
It remains for the USSC to hold that, when those issues are litigated.

plainoldme wrote:

and technology to match the days when a gun was an essential accessory.

It ALWAYS has been essential.
Failure to wear guns has resulted in too many unnecessary deaths, because of gun control.

plainoldme wrote:

Let's return to hand crafting goods

That can be good; its a private decision.

plainoldme wrote:

and shipping them by sail.
Let's get rid of birth control and return to bungling.
Women, go buy a bustle and corset! And, please, do away with computers,
cell phones, land lines, television, radio, automobiles and planes.

Those matters are unrelated and irrelevant to defensive gun possession.

All that is related is: laissez faire non-jurisdiction qua gun possession,
as it was, up thru the early 1900s, thru out America.

I recommend that violently recidivistic criminals be ISOLATED
and denied contact with the decent people; (ideally, not on the North American Continent).

plainoldme wrote:

Forward! Into the Past!

Yes; we need to correct and eradicate the errors of liberalism
and replace them with libertarianism!

David

2 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

Our society abandoned the open carrying of guns and swords long ago.
Why are you screaming, "Forward, into the past!"

Because the citizens were raped and sodomized (by liberals) out of their defensive rights. That 's Y.

That must be CORRECTED.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

How sad that you think there was more individualism at any point in history besides the migration period when our ancestors left Africa.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Come, come, liberalism is an improving, civilizing philosophy, the polar opposite of conservatism which is a lock step, violent philosophy.

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

How sad that you think there was more individualism at any point in history
besides the migration period when our ancestors left Africa.

When our ancestors threw out the King of England
and his representatives, we had the freedom to start from a clean slate.

The American Revolution was led by the Sons of Liberty.
It was a libertarian revolution; thay were sick n tired of authoritarianism.
Accordingly, (KNOWING that the domestic jurisdiction of government is INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL to personal freedom),
the Founders curtailed, crippled and strangled that domestic jurisdiction 37 different ways, in the Bill of Rights alone.

Therefore, in that void, Individualism was free to flourish; it did.

Liberalism, was and is an illicit deviation
from that subjugation of government.

Those who love and adhere to the original idea of personal freedom
embodied in the US Constitution are Original, Orthodox-Conservatives; i.e., lovers of liberty.
Those who DEVIATE (including such as Pat Robertson with his theoratic ideas) are liberals, because of that deviation.

David

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

Come, come, liberalism is an improving, civilizing philosophy,
the polar opposite of conservatism which is a lock step, violent philosophy.

I love and remain loyal to the libertarian concept
of strangled, crippled government that was established by the Founders.
I am the enemy of authoritarianism.
When I have had positions of authority, I have not been overbearing.

Violence has its place.
Without that we 'd still be held in subjection to the English Crown.

I wish that Sharon Tate and her friends had been sufficiently
well armed to be more VIOLENT, when the Manson gang broke in.
Sadly, Sharon and her friends were all in perfect, docile obedience to ALL gun control laws,
to the aid and delight of the Manson intruders.
The penalty for obaying gun control laws is death, with no appeal.

I notice that u simply IGNORED
my rendition of the Susan Gonzalez incident, Plain; nothing to say.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

How does that work ?
Being armed is unrelated to sexuality.
It always has been.

Being armed is so 17th, 18th, and 19th C.

If we are going to live in the past, let's live in the past on all levels. Why be inconsistent?

We evolved as a society away from gun toting so why return to a less sophisticated and less safe level?

Me, I want the freedom to walk down a street where there are no idiots with guns.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Chose the right word. Deviation has to do with statistics or morals and not with the Constitution which can and should be amended. Let's take the Second Amendment out!

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Who the hell is Susan Gonzalez?

As I have repeatedly posted, self-defense experts and promoters of non-violence tell women to not use guns and knives. Well, they can peel fruit with a knife.

1 Reply

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

Who the hell is Susan Gonzalez?

As I have repeatedly posted, self-defense experts and promoters of non-violence
tell women to not use guns and knives. Well, they can peel fruit with a knife.

2nd iteration, for your convenience:

There was a lady in Florida, Susan Gonzalez, who feared n detested guns.
She requested her husband not to have any guns in their house,
especially with their children there. One night, 2 criminals broke
down their front door. They entered her home, shot Mrs. Gonzalez twice,
and shot her husband as he lay harmlessly in his bed.

Franticly, she scrambled to get the OBJECT OF ABHORENCE:
her husband's 9 shot .22 caliber revolver.

She grabbed it up and killed one of the criminals.
The other fled, after she shot him too.

Altho it is possible that the criminals might have allowed Mrs. Gonzalez’ 5 children to live
(if they did not care that the children'd complain to the police and testify against them in court)
Mrs. G was not willing to confide the lives of her children to the discretion of the men
who had just shot both of their parents.

This attack was STOPPED by the presence of an UNLOCKED gun in the home.
Without it, the murders of the parents and children probably would have continued until all the children were dead.
That gun was the INSTRUMENT OF LIFE for the Gonzalez family.

After hospitalization, the Gonzalezes recovered from their wounds.
She became a public speaker in support of the right to keep and bear arms,
and takes her .38 Taurus revolver everywhere with her.

Wise is he who learns from his mistakes,
but wiser is he who learns from the mistakes of others.

David

0 Replies

@plainoldme,

plainoldme wrote:

Chose the right word. Deviation has to do with statistics or morals

Nonsense, Professor.
Deviation means veering away or turning aside.

plainoldme wrote:

and not with the Constitution which can
and should be amended. Let's take the Second Amendment out!

Lets amend it to reject and deport all liberals.

David

0 Replies

de·vi·a·tion /ˌdiviˈeɪʃən/ Show Spelled[dee-vee-ey-shuhn] Show IPA
–noun
1. the act of deviating.
2. departure from a standard or norm.
3. Statistics . the difference between one of a set of values
and some fixed value, usually the mean of the set.
4. Navigation . the error of a magnetic compass, as that of a ship,
on a given heading as a result of local magnetism.
Compare variation ( def. 8 ) .
5. Optics .
a. Also called deflection. the bending of rays of light away from a straight line.
b. angle of deviation.
6. departure or divergence from an established dogma or ideology, esp. a Communist one.

de·vi·a·tion (dē'vē-ā'shən)
n.
The act of deviating or turning aside.

An abnormality; a departure:
"Vice was a deviation from our nature" (Henry Fielding).

Deviant behavior or attitudes.

Divergence from an accepted political policy or party line.

Deflection of a compass needle caused by local magnetic influence, especially on a ship.

Statistics The difference, especially the absolute difference, between one number in a set and the mean of the set.

de'vi·a'tion·ism n. , de'vi·a'tion·ist adj. & n.

Synonyms : These nouns mean a departure from what is prescribed or expected:
tolerates no deviation from the rules;
regretted the aberrations of my adolescence;
the divergence of two cultures.

0 Replies

Gun permit allows quick access to Texas Capitol

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know