25
   

Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?

 
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Wed 24 Nov, 2010 10:52 pm
This acquaintance rape occurred in a high school bathroom. The defense attorney claims the sex was consensual, but the young man admitted to police that he forced himself on the girl and she tried to fight him off. That sure doesn't sound consensual, does it?

After the girl reported the rape to school authorities, they delayed several hours in notifying CPS and they never notified the police. That allowed the young man to go home, shower and change his clothes, and during that time, the school bathroom in which the rape occurred was also cleaned. The school may now face charges for not reporting the rape immediately and for interfering with the investigation.
Quote:
Teen charged as adult in Muncie Central rape
Nov 22, 2010

A 16-year-old boy will be charged as an adult in the rape of a fellow student.

Police say Steven Moore raped a 16-year-old girl in a restroom at Muncie Central High School earlier this month.

A tentative jury trial is set for March 1, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. Bond was set at $20,000. The Delaware County Prosecutor didn't respond to an Eyewitness News request for an interview regarding the decision to charge the teen as an adult.

The girl reported the rape to the school office, but police say the school never called officers. The school also waited more than four hours to make the required call to Child Protective Services.

Police say the 16-year-old suspect admitted to forcing himself on the girl. He says she tried to fight him off during the attack.

Eyewitness News contacted the victim's mother, who declined to comment on the case. Moore's attorney tells Eyewitness News the contact between the students was consensual, not rape.

"This was a consensual interaction between two people that were not in an established relationship," said Jake Dunnuck. "I think there is likely some evidence they knew each other, that there was a mutual liking and a mutual decision to do this."

He can't say the victim would then report it as rape if it wasn't.

"Is it inappropriate? Absolutely. Is it uncommon? Sadly, it's not," Dunnuck said about sex in school.

But Deputy Prosecutor Eric Hoffman says, "All the evidence so far indicates it was not consensual. It was by force, or the threat of force and, in fact, the victim tried to push him off of her."

Hoffman says Moore admitted that to police and told police he knew he caused her pain and "that he had crossed the line."

He denies his client tried to destroy evidence in the case by washing his clothes when he got home. The defense says that wasn't to hide evidence, but that Moore is just a "clean-cut" kid. The prosecutor's office disagrees.

"We have a victim who has been very consistent with what she's told law enforcement and that will help us in the trial of the case," Hoffman said.

The Muncie Community Schools superintendent was out of the office and unavailable for comment Monday, but did speak about the delay in reporting the alleged crime with Eyewitness News last week.

"I don't know if I can speak to the delay, but we are cooperating," said Dr. Eric King.

Muncie Police are also investigating why school officials never reported the alleged attack. Police described school officials as "interfering" and "delaying with the investigation." Police say officials are now cooperating, but are also under investigation for possibly violating state law for failing to report the crime.
http://www.wthr.com/story/13549467/teen-charged-as-adult-in-muncie-central-rape?clienttype=printable
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:17 am
@firefly,
Quote:
This acquaintance rape occurred in a high school bathroom. The defense attorney claims the sex was consensual, but the young man admitted to police that he forced himself on the girl and she tried to fight him off. That sure doesn't sound consensual, does it?


And you point being what Firefly as no one had question that sadly real rape does happen now and then?

It is interesting that now we are starting to see the logical outcome of your support of crazy rapes laws where not only are the males in a statutory rape case being charge but the underage female is also being charge right along with the two guys for having underage sex with each other.

I can not wait under the same type of crazy logic will end up with both the male and the female charge with the crime of sexual assaulting each other in a drunken state as neither could grant to the other valid permission for sex.

No commonsense laws will result in even the partner with the female body parts charge along with her male partner.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:22 am
@firefly,
Quote:
That allowed the young man to go home, shower and change his clothes, and during that time, the school bathroom in which the rape occurred was also cleaned
So evidence was lost that sex took place, which no one Denys, so what exactly is the problem?? Are you alleging that something that would have shed light on the consent question was lost? If so what?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:26 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
you are not so slow that you think corporate media is an unbiased independent source for truth, are you?
That's correct. Isnt that what I was saying from another direction ? Or is it you dont have enough people to argue with ?
Ionus
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:32 am
@BillRM,
Quote:
And you point being what Firefly as no one had question that sadly real rape does happen now and then?
Obviously one case proves them all...it is men that are the problem...bastards...human race would be better off without them. In the mean time lets all feast on juicy details of rape. Just like the soapy on TV only real....a thrill a minute! And when we build up real hysteria we will use it to make even more draconian laws because women are equal......to other women...men come last.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:36 am
@Ionus,
Quote:
That's correct. Isnt that what I was saying from another direction ? Or is it you dont have enough people to argue with ?
My words were for Panzade...I was agreeing with you, from a different angle, in the hopes that he would find at least one of our viewpoints worthy of consideration.

I should have made this more clear
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 02:27 am
@firefly,
Quote:
Sexual Assault: Any unwanted act of a sexual nature that is imposed on another person
So we have this study that shows that the majority of High School girls dont want to have sex,but that the majority do because if they will not put out the boys tend not to want them.....is this sexual assault? Is this coercion than invalidates consent to sex because the threat of not having a relationship if they dont have sex is subtly communicated to them? Given the social structure which pressures girls to have sex when they dont want to are ALL the girls victims and are ALL the boys who have sex with them rapists...because given Fireflys logic and definition of sexual assault it appears to me that we could make this interpretation.

Quote:
A tamer version of that observation is borne out in the economists' work among high schoolers. Unsurprisingly, the majority of high school boys want to have sex (though only 47.6 percent of freshmen boys do). Unsurprisingly, the majority of high school girls do not (though 50.1 percent of senior girls do). Over the course of four years, the power shifts from the freshman girls who don't want to have sex to the senior boys who do.

The conclusion? Though high-school girls don't really want to have sex, many more of them end up doing so in order to "match" with a high-school boy. For them, a relationship at some point becomes more important than purity. Because of that phenomenon, in schools with more boys than girls, the girls hold more cards and have less sex. Where there are more girls, the male preference for sex tends to win out.

http://www.slate.com/id/2274570?wpisrc=obinsite

Me, I dispense with the rape feminist victim/abuser paradigm and go the the economics supply and demand in the market place paradigm....females who dont want to have sex sometimes find that they need to adjust to the marketplace and in order to increase their value in that marketplace are forced to have sex even thought they dont want to. This is a choice, they dont have to be in the market at all, their being in the market and conforming to the demands of the market is a consensual act on their part. They are not victims, they are just like the males out to get what they want, and they use the tools at there disposal to do this. No crimes has been committed, this is normal everyday life.
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 10:39 am
@hawkeye10,
I love Firefly idea that if a man placed any pressure of any kind on a woman for sex he is a rapist meaning that all men are rapists and if that is true then the only logical thing to do is to legally rape as you can not placed 48 percents of the total population in prison.

I wonder what percent of the population is aware of the directions the law is being push in by the Feminists.

We now are just starting to see the law punishing both sides of underage sex and soon if this craziness is allow to go forward both the male and the female will ended up being charge with having non-consensus sex under the influence as after all it does not made sense to charge one party just due to the plumbing of the person.
Intrepid
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 10:48 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
Quote:
The law that I live under requires no words either way.


That is not a law. It is delusion.
hawkeye10
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:31 pm
@Intrepid,
Quote:

That is not a law. It is delusion.


Quote:
(7) "Consent" means that at the time of the act of sexual intercourse or sexual contact there are actual words or conduct indicating freely given agreement to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.010
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 12:41 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:

I love Firefly idea that if a man placed any pressure of any kind on a woman for sex he is a rapist meaning that all men are rapists
Yes, her and her pals have attempted to appropriate the word "rape" which once was used to describe sexual violence against women and converted it to a word that is meant to describe what they consider to be the injustice towards women that men want sex more than women...because you see, according to these people all that is supposed to matter is what women want. Men's needs/wants/desires are second class to theirs. I talked some about this earlier, how the real problem of sexual abuse has been hijacked for a political cause through pushing through a inappropriate and unhelpful definition of rape. I have also pointed out the the rape feminists are no where near done trying to redefine rape to further their cause, and that we need to wise up and put a stop to it. Part of this assertion of mine was in this post
http://able2know.org/topic/158723-279#post-4423660

Where I quoted from a expert on consent

Quote:
If we reference, either intentionally or not, the conventional criminal-code definition of rape to describe the phenomenon of "compuls0ry heterosexuality" because coercion is central to both, then we invite the mistaken conclusion that promoting greater enforcement and prosecution of rape crimes, as understood by the state, will end patriarchy.

But this conclusion is not warranted,and not simply because the sex described by the inclusive definition of "rape" previously is not what the state will prosecute,no mater what the definition of rape. It isn't warranted, more fundamentally, because the compulsory conditions that elicit consent to unwanted sex might be more central to obnoxious regimes than the knives and fists employed by rapists to overpower their victims will. Even if it is true, as McKinnon begins the most important book, that 'sexuality is to feminism what work is to Marxism; that which is most ones own and most taken away" 22 then the conflation between rape and consensual sex seems all the more particularly ill advised: Wiping out all theft, through more aggressive use of criminal law, will not fundamentally return sex to women. Economic exploitation of laborers is not the result of the states underinformcement of laws against theft,and likewise sexual exploitation is not the result of the states underenforcment of the laws against rape. By conflating the problem of exploitative and expropriated sexuality with the problem of rape , we encourage not only the conceptual confusion but also strategic misdirection. Much of third wave feminism- the "Take Back the Night" rallies, self defense and anti-rape education initiatives on high school and college campuses- though arguably vital to ensuring women's safety on the street, might be oversold as a means for ensuring women's equality, and an end to their sexual exploitation. We do need to address the conditions, states of mind , and social structures that so overwhelmingly prompt, suggest,or compel women to consent to sex that they do not desire or want: That is the deepest,most vital, and most profoundly historic claim at the heart of McKinnon's reconstruction of radical feminism. That sex, however, is not rape, and we don't come any closer to addressing it by calling it something that it is not


I do agree with the feminists that women often dont stand up for what they want, they they often do what men want to keep the peace, however if the feminists consider this to be a problem then the redress is to encourage women to be more assertive. It never should have been to appropriate the sexual violence problem by redefining rape, and then claiming that the "problem" of compliant women is actually an abuser/victim problem. Men have the right to lobby for what we want from women, this is not abuse, this is freedom.
OmSigDAVID
 
  3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 04:42 pm
Quote:
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?
That woud be an oxymoronic contradiction in terms.





David
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 04:43 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
That woud be an oxymoronic contradiction in terms.

then you have not paid attention....we proved long ago that the answer is yes, a woman can ask to get raped.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 10:05 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?
That woud be an oxymoronic contradiction in terms.


David by the theory Firefly is working by a woman can beg you to have sex with her and then claimed later that you had rape her as she was in no condition to consent to sex.

In real life after woman jump into a sleeping man bed and started sexual activities the man found himself facing a full scale court marshal over the matter.

So yes a woman can indeed ask to be rape in a Firefly universe.
Ionus
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 10:38 pm
There are three camps here....
1) Women demanding to be protected beyond reason and sensible limits (hidden meaning - if you want me to carry your genetic material into the next generation for you, you had better)

2) Men saying of course I will protect you (hidden meaning - if you will carry my genetic material in to the next generation for me)

3) Men saying that level of protection is silly...be an adult and stop whinging.

Logic dictates the fourth camp of women who say rape laws are unreasonable in their current form. They are absent for the same reason they were quiet when the libbies were damaging society with their male bashing.....the less respect men have for themselves, the more they will die to protect women.
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 11:00 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
Logic dictates the fourth camp of women who say rape laws are unreasonable in their current form. They are absent for the same reason they were quiet when the libbies were damaging society with their male bashing


The answer to why females dont object would I think be very enlightening. My theory is that women dont speak up against the insanity because they have a nagging sense that even if they dont want to be treated like children, even if they dont see any evidence of the claimed rape crisis, that they are honor bound to support their sisters who claim that they are victims of abuse from men and that they very much need the state to protect them with these wide ranging and intrusive laws.

I do think that Bill is correct though, that as they increasingly see good men distroyed by these laws, and as they see how timid men have become and see for themselves the wide ranging damage that this timidity causes in relationships between men and women that women will rise up and yell " ENOUGH!".....Also as they see what these laws do to women, not only the acting stupid because no matter what happens they can get away with blaming men rather than looking at themselves, but also taking this power and lording it over men, thus creating a new class of bitches. Just as women are more likely to blame women for rape than men are women are going to be more repulsed by these new age bitches than men are.

I fully expect that it will be the women, not the men, who put down the rape feminist movement. I also think that the rape feminists are going to be shocked, as they have always been on guard for men rebelling against their misandry, they have never expected women to be a problem and thus are unprepared to deal with the revolt once the "you must have sympathy for your victimized sisters" guilt trip no longer works.
0 Replies
 
Oylok
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 11:34 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
There are three camps here....
1) Women demanding to be protected beyond reason...
2) Men saying of course I will protect you...
3) Men saying that level of protection is silly...
Logic dictates the fourth camp of women who say rape laws are unreasonable...


Well framed, genius. But in listing what four camps should exist you have overlooked my camp. Cool

5) Men who are embarrassed by the way the 1's are clobbering the 3's right now and just want this to end. Why do put yourself in the same camp as Hawkeye, anyway? (You motives for being here seem quite different.)
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 11:36 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"?
That woud be an oxymoronic contradiction in terms.
BillRM wrote:
David by the theory Firefly is working by a woman can beg you
to have sex with her and then claimed later that you had rape her as she was in no condition to consent to sex.

In real life after woman jump into a sleeping man bed and started
sexual activities the man found himself facing a full scale court marshal over the matter.
A general court martial?
What was the judgment of the court martial ?





David
BillRM
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 11:55 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
A general court martial?
What was the judgment of the court martial ?


Yes a full damn general court martial as both the man and woman were West Point cadets and the court did in the end find him not guilt.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 25 Nov, 2010 11:58 pm
@Oylok,
Quote:
Well framed, genius.
How did you know I was a genuis ? Yopu've been peaking havent you ? Naughty, naughty....
Quote:
5) Men who.......just want this to end.
You see if you were a wily coyote super genius like me, you would be asking why do you want it to end ? And dont give me some half-baked bullshit reason such as "because".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/17/2025 at 07:45:18