@92b16vx,
socalgolfguy;47951 wrote:Spoken like a true liberal socialist. Listen, the reason no nukes were found is the same reason my dad never found my pot in my room when I was 16 and he only gave me 5 minutes warning that he was coming to inspect. And, if you think Iran is developing nuclear for energy only, just listen to their leader - he hates you and everything you stand for as an American.
In order for their nuclear capabilities to become a threat (for it to become weaponized), they will have to perform tests. Tests which will be impossible to hide from us. At that point, when we have definitive evidence that they are developing nuclear weapons, we would be justified in intervening (NOT invading, diplomatically intervening). Until that point in time, it's none of our goddamn business how they generate their electricity.
Pinochet73;47997 wrote:Wow. You don't see any strategic value in the Middle East. That's beyond my comprehension. Just what planet do you live on, anyway?:wtf:
I recognize the fact that it is a great strategic vantage point, but my perspective is broad enough to be retro-intuitive. Imagine if China decided that Mexico was harboring anti-Chinese terrorists, so they invade Mexico, destroy their military, and install a mirror chinese govt. (lead by mexicans, of course :beat: ) You bet your bottom dollar the US would have a huge problem with it, and we'd be sending soldiers to Mexico to fight the Chinese invasion. Exactly what Iran is doing.